+1
regards,
gerhard
Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:
>
> Hi lords and ladies!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2
>
> We fixed the following tickets
>
> Bug
> [OWB-1436] - org.apache.webbeans.el22.Wrap
+1
regards,
gerhard
Am Sa., 11. Jan. 2020 um 16:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I've run all the tasks to release OWB 2.0.14
>
> Here is the list of fixed bugs:
>
> Bug
>
> • [OWB-1280] - NPE in filterExcludedJars
> •
+1
regards,
gerhard
Am Do., 9. Mai 2019 um 08:52 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:
>
> hi folks!
>
> Since we now already moved OWB itself and the meecrowave-examples, should we
> also move Meecrowave to GIT?
> This is affect the last remaining project sticking with SVN (except
yes a chain or a spi with priority (both should be fine).
regards,
gerhard
Am Do., 9. Mai 2019 um 22:35 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
:
>
> I see, means it is not a spi but a "spi chain" right? (handle vs
> isSupported+handle)
>
> Makes sense this way to me.
>
+1
regards,
gerhard
Am Do., 9. Mai 2019 um 22:23 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
:
>
> Hi Arne,
>
> No because constructors are just marked with inject, not constructor
> injections (1 vs N).
>
> I can do it tomorrow - will try the spi thing too. Just thought it was not
&g
a significant part of the decisive
factor). -> large/r migration-projects might benefit from such an
option (i still know large projects using ee <= v5).
@OWB-1287:
i'll have a look at it next week
regards,
gerhard
Am Do., 9. Mai 2019 um 18:55 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
:
>
> Hi
.
regards,
gerhard
Am Mo., 6. Mai 2019 um 23:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
:
>
> Le lun. 6 mai 2019 à 22:51, Gerhard Petracek a
> écrit :
>
> > my point was just to add a spi similar to the resource-injection spi...
> > or maybe we can even unify the spi for all types of i
my point was just to add a spi similar to the resource-injection spi...
or maybe we can even unify the spi for all types of injections.
regards,
gerhard
Am Mo., 6. Mai 2019 um 20:43 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
:
>
> Well im happy with the spi option but since it would be in impl not s
hi arne,
at least with owb 1.x it didn't work.
however, >if< it would work that way (with both implementations), it's
imo more a topic for ds.
regards,
gerhard
Am Mo., 6. Mai 2019 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Arne Limburg
:
>
> Hmm,
> thinking more of it:
> Shouldn't it be just an E
injection-spi (to allow multiple plugins which can
participate in the "injection-lifecycle").
-> your approach would be one of many plugins users can add (e.g. with
auto. activation...).
regards,
gerhard
Am So., 5. Mai 2019 um 22:09 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
:
>
> Good cat
+1!
regards,
gerhard
Am Fr., 3. Mai 2019 um 13:31 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:
>
> hi folks!
>
> Do we want to move OWB core to GIT?
>
> wdyt?
>
> I'd be +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
+1
regards,
gerhard
Am Di., 16. Apr. 2019 um 17:49 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
:
>
> Sure
>
> @Cdi
> class MyTest {
> @Inject Mybean bean;
>
> @Test
> void run() {
> //...
> }
> }
>
> You can also select just a few beans in @
+1
regards,
gerhard
Am Sa., 29. Dez. 2018 um 17:16 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
:
> hi folks!
>
> Do we finally want to move to gitbox?
>
> Our Meecrowave-examples are already there:
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave-examples
>
> I recommend the foll
+1
regards,
gerhard
Am Mi., 7. Nov. 2018 um 17:40 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8
>
> The following tickets got resolved:
>
> Bug
>
> [OWB-1257]
+1
regards,
gerhard
Am Fr., 24. Aug. 2018 um 14:32 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> +1, all is already here for me :)
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.met
+1
regards,
gerhard
2018-07-19 12:01 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Hi guys,
>
> Sorry for the fast release start but there are two clear blockers in 1.2.2
> so it would be awesome to get the 1.2.3 out ASAP.
>
> The diff is mainly fixing these two issues:
> 1. Ensur
+1
regards,
gerhard
2018-07-14 9:33 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> hi folks!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for releaseing Apache Meecrowave-1.2.2
>
> The following bugs and improvements got resolved:
>
> Bug
> • [MEECROWAVE-100] - exclude integration-test m
+1
regards,
gerhard
2018-04-28 22:52 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> good evening!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE to release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5.
>
> The following tickets got resolved
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1233] - WrappedValueExpress
i've upgraded [1] to v1.2.1 and all tests look fine.
-> +1
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaForkMicro
2018-02-26 22:40 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Hi folks!
>
> This is a vote for Microwave-1.2.1
>
> The following bug
+1
(i've tested it with ideafork-micro which is used in the upcoming chapter
of [1]).
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://cdiatwork.irian.at
2017-12-20 17:57 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Hi folks!
>
> I've also run the steps to release Meecrowave-1.2.0
&g
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-12-19 9:01 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Hi folks!
>
> Currently refactoring the WebBeansUtil#configureProducerMethodSpecial
> izations.
>
> This method is not easy to follow and could be seriously simplified.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-12-20 16:01 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run all steps to release OWB-2.0.3.
>
> We fixed the following bugs and improvements
>
> Bug
>
> [OWB-1171] - @Priority and @Alterna
Gerhard Petracek created MEECROWAVE-82:
--
Summary: meecrowave-maven-plugin fails with bean-validation
Key: MEECROWAVE-82
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-82
Project
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-11-09 15:36 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> CDI conversations are hardly usable anyway ;)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 09.11.2017 um 09:34 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >:
> &g
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-10-05 11:38 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> And also will update to johnzon-1.1.4 before that.
> CXF is already updated to 3.2.0 which will require people to update CXF
> and JAX-RS api, so I'd prefer calling it 1.2.0.
>
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-09-01 23:35 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Hi!
>
> Apache Meecrowave is a very small (9MB) EE based server.
> It can run embeded, as single-jar app, or as a installable zip via
> $> mvn meecrowave:b
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-08-29 11:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>:
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2)
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-07-30 13:36 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Well, I was thinking about a OWB-2.0.1 release.
> And of course then do a MW-2.0.0 or MW-1.1.0 (not sure anymore on what we
> settled and which is better for MW).
>
> LieG
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-07-08 0:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Hi folks!
>
> And finally Meecrowave-1.0.0!
> This is a maintenance version for the EE7 compatible version.
> It's actually the previous 0.3.2 work. We just moved to 1.0.0 to
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-07-08 0:05 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Dear lords and ladies!
>
> It's my pleasure to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.4.
> This is a maintenance release of our CDI-1.2 branch and a drop in
> repl
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-07-06 12:00 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> I think we should release OWB-1.7.4 first (because of the proxy bug with
> handling signed jars) and then ship MW-1.0.0.
>
> Wdyt?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> >
fyi @MEECROWAVE-50:
it works with the latest snapshot
regards,
gerhard
2017-07-04 11:34 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org>:
> hi romain,
>
> it should be possible to reproduce it with any demo, however, you could
> use e.g. [1].
> (it uses v0.3.1, but also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated MEECROWAVE-50:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.0.0)
0.3.1
Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek resolved MEECROWAVE-50.
Resolution: Fixed
it works with the latest snapshot
> meecrowave-maven-plu
...
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://github.com/os890/meecrowave_template_jax-rs_cdi_jpa
2017-07-04 11:09 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> @Gerhard: have the simple-demo somewhere on github? will try to resetup my
> win box in the week
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well.
-> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50).
regards,
gerhard
2017-07-03 16:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> Yes and no (until you hit it I guess).
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/
hi romain,
yes - keeping the starter-class in the test-source directory used to be my
workaround for tomee (which works for meecrowave as well).
however, i'm trying to get rid of that workaround. (sorry for skipping that
part in my initial message).
regards,
gerhard
2017-07-02 23:19 GMT+02:00
useful to allow both in parallel (such a
starter-class as well as the maven-plugin or runner-jar) without using
workarounds like different maven profiles.
regards,
gerhard
[1]
https://github.com/os890/meecrowave_template_jax-rs_cdi_jpa/blob/master/src/dev-starter/java/org/os890/meecrowave/dev
Gerhard Petracek created MEECROWAVE-50:
--
Summary: meecrowave-maven-plugin is not portable
Key: MEECROWAVE-50
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-50
Project: Meecrowave
sounds great!
i'm going to test the snapshot soon.
regards,
gerhard
2017-06-17 22:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Yes, it should 'just work' afaict.
> We even kept the SPI the same.
> We most likely will add an async event related API for better integ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1192:
--
Description:
new parts:
* Instance
** #stream
** #isResolvable
* BeanManager#createInstance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1188:
--
Description:
new parts:
* Event#fireAsync
* @ObservesAsync
* ObserverMethod#isAsync
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1189:
--
Description:
new parts:
* EventContext
* NotificationOptions/ImmutableNotificationOptions
Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1193:
-
Summary: implement InterceptionFactory
Key: OWB-1193
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1193
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1189:
--
Component/s: (was: Core)
Events
> add new parts to the event-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1188:
--
Component/s: (was: Core)
Events
> implement async eve
Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1192:
-
Summary: update logic for Instance
Key: OWB-1192
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1192
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: Sub-task
Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1189:
-
Summary: add new parts to the event-api
Key: OWB-1189
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1189
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1188:
--
Description:
new parts:
* Event#fireAsync
* ObservesAsync
* ObserverMethod#isAsync
was:
new
Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1187:
-
Summary: implement configurators
Key: OWB-1187
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1187
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1185:
--
Description:
+ default implementations in:
* AnnotatedConstructor
* AnnotatedField
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1186:
--
Description:
new methods:
AfterBeanDiscovery
#addBean()
#addObserverMethod()
AfterTypeDiscovery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1186:
--
Description:
new methods:
AfterBeanDiscovery
#addBean()
#addObserverMethod()
AfterTypeDiscovery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1186:
--
Summary: implement new methods of bootstrapping-events (was: implement new
methods
Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1186:
-
Summary: implement new methods of AfterBeanDiscovery
Key: OWB-1186
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1186
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type
Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1185:
-
Summary: implement Annotated#getAnnotations
Key: OWB-1185
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1185
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: Sub-task
i've upgraded [1] to v1.7.3 and all tests look fine.
-> +1
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
2017-04-16 0:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I've run the tasks to ship OWB 1.7.3.
>
> The follo
the source-zip looks fine -> +1
regards,
gerhard
2017-01-04 13:18 GMT+01:00 Reinhard Sandtner <reinhard.sandt...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> lg
> reini
>
> > Am 04.01.2017 um 09:20 schrieb Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID
> >:
> >
> &
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek reopened OWB-1121:
---
see the voting thread for v1.6.3
> IllegalStateException in case of duplicated clas
hi,
i would prefer an info which shows the final order (of interceptors,...)
including skipped configs due to such a (valid) redundancy.
-> with that we get an additional benefit (for users).
regards,
gerhard
2016-07-08 12:27 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1130:
-
Summary: ContainerCtrlTckTest fails
Key: OWB-1130
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1130
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
since it happened randomly, i tested it multiple times.
so far it looks fine - thx!
regards,
gerhard
2016-04-14 19:57 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> pushed a change, if anyone has time to validate it. Hope to be able to work
> on a test next week
+1 for changing it (otherwise we break ds-partial-beans)
regards,
gerhard
2016-03-20 15:03 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> Hi guys,
>
> any reason to consider the event fired before firing it there:
>
> https://github.com/apa
ldn't fail that way (in such a case).
-> i won't vote with +1 (but with +0).
regards,
gerhard
2016-02-17 19:44 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> AFAIK it is due to a setup issue in DS which broke the classpath on some
> module if it is the one you refer too
we shouldn't release it (as it is), because deltaspike-cdictrl-owb fails
with it (v1.6.2 passes).
regards,
gerhard
2016-02-16 23:17 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>:
> Hi!
>
> I’ve performed the steps to release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.3
>
> The staging r
+1
regards,
gerhard
2016-02-13 13:09 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> 2016-02-13 12:56 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1 then we release tomee
> > Le 13 févr. 2016 12:29, "Mark Struberg&qu
+1 for 1.7
imo there is no need to stick with 1.6.x
regards,
gerhard
2016-01-31 16:42 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> +1 for 1.7
> but as romain said, i'm also very sure this is rarely used by users.
>
> 2016-01-31 16:26 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg
+1
regards,
gerhard
2016-01-23 11:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>:
> Hi!
>
> What do you think about moving openwebbeans to GIT.
> Of course hosted at the ASF.
>
> Would probably be helpful when working on the CDI-2.0 branch in the future.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960743#comment-14960743
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-1095:
---
the issue is in InjectionResolver.
it contains an empty value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960754#comment-14960754
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-1095:
---
no - the empty value is stored too early in that case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960754#comment-14960754
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-1095 at 10/16/15 2:04 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960754#comment-14960754
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-1095 at 10/16/15 2:07 PM
+1
regards,
gerhard
2015-08-11 13:58 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi folks!
What about starting with implementing CDI-2.0?
The spec is of course not finished but I’d like to be a bit more bleeding
edge than last time ;)
I’ll start with copying over the geronimo-jcdi spec
+1
regards,
gerhard
2015-08-07 22:03 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi!
I'd like to call a VOTE for a maintenance release of Apache
OpenWebBeans-1.6.2.
We fixed 2 bugs which are needed by TomEE-7.x
Here is the staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek reopened OWB-935:
--
wrong result of javax.enterprise.inject.Instance in combination with
alternatives
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645953#comment-14645953
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-935:
--
see the 3 tests - two of them fail
wrong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645953#comment-14645953
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-935 at 7/29/15 12:57 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645953#comment-14645953
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-935 at 7/29/15 12:57 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645953#comment-14645953
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-935 at 7/29/15 12:20 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1085:
--
Attachment: OWB-1085.zip
bootstrapping events observed outside of extension-implementations
Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1085:
-
Summary: bootstrapping events observed outside of
extension-implementations
Key: OWB-1085
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1085
Project: OpenWebBeans
+1
regards,
gerhard
2015-06-18 8:46 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
+1 from me.
LieGrue,
strub
Am 16.06.2015 um 08:10 schrieb Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi!
I’d like to call a VOTE on Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.1.
The staging repository is here
https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1078:
--
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Bug)
create Dockerfiles for installing OpenWebBeans as Docker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek resolved OWB-1081.
---
Resolution: Fixed
check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14571898#comment-14571898
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-1081 at 6/4/15 12:34 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14571898#comment-14571898
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-1081:
---
in ObserverMethodImpl#notify
{code
Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1081:
-
Summary: check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context
Key: OWB-1081
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1081
Project: OpenWebBeans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1081:
--
Attachment: OWB-1081.patch
check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context
i've upgraded several projects to v1.6.0 (e.g. [1] and [2]) and all tests
look fine.
- +1
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
[2]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary
2015-06-01 17:29 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-654:
-
Attachment: OWB-654_test.zip
manual lookups of beans with generics fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek reopened OWB-654:
--
Assignee: Mark Struberg (was: Gerhard Petracek)
manual lookups of beans with generics fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14563477#comment-14563477
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-654:
--
please have a look at the test and compare
i've upgraded several projects to v1.2.8 (e.g. [1] and [2]) and all tests
look fine.
- +1
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
[2]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary
2015-04-22 15:37 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub
+1
regards,
gerhard
2015-04-22 14:03 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com:
+1
2015-04-22 14:01 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi folks!
We got a few requests to ship a new 1.2.x release.
If there is no objection then I gonna start with the release
+1
regards,
gerhard
2015-04-15 21:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi!
Another round of release bingo ;)
It’s a great pleasure - again :) - to call a second VOTE for releasing
Apache OpenWebBeans-1.5.0.
OWB-1.5.x is the first version to support CDI-1.2 which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek reopened OWB-798:
--
the check is still in place (and slow)
expensive check in EventUtil#checkEventBindings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-798:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5.0)
1.5.1
expensive check in EventUtil
i did further tests and the issue isn't specific to jetty.
- +1 for fixing the issue before releasing v1.5.0.
regards,
gerhard
2015-04-13 10:16 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com:
I get following error when starting with trunk (i think there are
currently no changes
i've upgraded several projects to v1.5.0 (e.g. [1] and [2]) and all tests
look fine.
- +1
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
[2]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary
2015-04-13 23:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub
+1
regards,
gerhard
2015-04-09 19:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi folks!
FINALLY I like to get OWB-1.5.0 out of the door. We now pass the TCK for
JavaSE as well as the web-profile TCK (within TomEE).
Time to get some real feedback apart from all the people who use
1 - 100 of 390 matches
Mail list logo
