hi arne, at least with owb 1.x it didn't work. however, >if< it would work that way (with both implementations), it's imo more a topic for ds.
regards, gerhard Am Mo., 6. Mai 2019 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>: > > Hmm, > thinking more of it: > Shouldn't it be just an Extension that adds an @Inject Annotation to every > Field and Method parameter that has a qualifier? > > Cheers, > Arne > > -- > Arne Limburg – Enterprise Architect > > > > OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH > Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg > Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942 > Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154 > Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111 > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > www.openknowledge.de > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > Nächste Konferenz: > > Java Forum Nord | Hannover | 24. September 2019 > > Nächste Akademie: > > API, Microservices & DDD Summit | München | 17. - 19. Juni 2019 > > Treffen Sie uns auf weiteren Konferenzen, > Summits und Events: > > Zu unseren weiteren Events > > > > Am 06.05.19, 14:06 schrieb "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org>: > > hi romain, > > some years ago i tried to do something similar (afair with owb 1.0.x) > based on our plugin-spi. > back then it was just possible via a plugin for resource-injection > (and it was a bit "tricky"). > if nothing changed in the meantime, we should take the chance to add a > more powerful injection-spi (to allow multiple plugins which can > participate in the "injection-lifecycle"). > -> your approach would be one of many plugins users can add (e.g. with > auto. activation...). > > regards, > gerhard > > Am So., 5. Mai 2019 um 22:09 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > > Good catch! > > > > If no objection i can push a first version like on friday I think. > > > > Le dim. 5 mai 2019 à 21:58, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a > > écrit : > > > > > And NO @Produces.... > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > Strub > > > > > > > Am 05.05.2019 um 20:07 schrieb Arne Limburg < > > > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>: > > > > > > > > I > > > > OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH > > > > Poststraße 1, 26122 Oldenburg > > > > Mobil: +49 151 - 108 22 942 > > > > Tel: +49 441 - 4082-154 > > > > Fax: +49 441 - 4082-111 > > > > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > > > > www.openknowledge.de > > > > > > > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > > > > Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > > > > > > > Nächste Konferenz: > > > > > > > > Jax | Mainz | 6. - 10. Mai 2019 > > > > > > > > Nächste Akademie: > > > > > > > > API, Microservices & DDD Summit | München | 17. - 19. Juni 2019 > > > > > > > > Treffen Sie uns auf weiteren Konferenzen, > > > > Summits und Events: > > > > > > > > Zu unseren weiteren Events > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > am fine with that. I even thought of that before, when I wanted to > add > > > @PersistenceContext as qualifier to implement injection of > EntityManager by > > > myself in a pure CDI-Scenario. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Arne > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Arne Limburg – Enterprise Architect > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 05.05.19, 19:39 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" > <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > >: > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > Quarkus makes @Inject optional for MP qualifiers, can we add a > flag > > > to get > > > > it? I.e. injection point is defined if inject is there or there > is a > > > > qualifier (even without inject)? > > > > > > > > It can probably be extended to delegate too - but less common. > > > > > > > > Guess it can be on by default but fine if you prefer it off too > to > > > > encourage portability. > > > > > > > > Wdyt? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
