Hello Mark
Is it possible to release 1.2.0 at the first and then cleaning process?
Thanks.
Gurkan
Kimden: Mark Struberg
Kime: openwebbeans-dev
Gönderildiği Tarih: 25 Kasım 2012 21:36 Pazar
Konu: heavy cleanup
I again found a heavy bug which is caused
Context as well...
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: heavy cleanup
>
>T hat's all perfect Mark.
> Thanks for the answer.
>
gt;
> >On Nov 25, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >
> >> I again found a heavy bug which is caused by things like
> >>
> >>
> >> //X TODO this MUST NOT be public!
> >> public static ThreadLocal>
> dependentInstanceOf
NOT be public!
>> public static ThreadLocal>
>> dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods =
>> new ThreadLocal>();
>>
>>
>> Such code is pure PITA!
>>
>>
>> I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trunk) and go for CDI-
MUST NOT be public!
> public static ThreadLocal>>
> dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods =
> new ThreadLocal>>();
>
>
> Such code is pure PITA!
>
>
> I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trunk) and go for CDI-1.1
> directly
y get clarified
> in CDI-1.1.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> >
> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg
> >Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 11:07 PM
> >Subject: Re: heavy cleanup
g
>Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 11:07 PM
>Subject: Re: heavy cleanup
>
>
>Hi,
>
>
>does the lifting prepare the CDI 1.1?
>Or do we also want CDI 1.1 developments in?
>
>
>I mean, does CDI 1.1 require a 1.2, 1.5 or 2.0?
>
>
>Not sure it needs a
pache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 8:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: heavy cleanup
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Will we also target java 1.6 ?
> >
> > 2012/11/25 Romain Manni-Bucau
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> All can b
Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 8:52 PM
> Subject: Re: heavy cleanup
>
> +1
>
> Will we also target java 1.6 ?
>
> 2012/11/25 Romain Manni-Bucau
>
>> +1
>>
>> All can be done independently now normally
>> Le 25 nov. 2012 20:37, "Mark
t;
> > //X TODO this MUST NOT be public!
> > public static ThreadLocal>>
> > dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods =
> > new ThreadLocal>>();
> >
> >
> > Such code is pure PITA!
> >
> >
> > I'm really tempted to do a hea
eOfProducerMethods =
> new ThreadLocal>>();
>
>
> Such code is pure PITA!
>
>
> I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trunk) and go for
> CDI-1.1 directly. The spec is good enough to give a rough direction atm and
> we really need to cleanup tons of things!
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
I again found a heavy bug which is caused by things like
//X TODO this MUST NOT be public!
public static ThreadLocal>>
dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods =
new ThreadLocal>>();
Such code is pure PITA!
I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trun
12 matches
Mail list logo