Yan: heavy cleanup

2012-11-27 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hello Mark Is it possible to release 1.2.0 at the first and then cleaning process? Thanks. Gurkan Kimden: Mark Struberg Kime: openwebbeans-dev Gönderildiği Tarih: 25 Kasım 2012 21:36 Pazar Konu: heavy cleanup I again found a heavy bug which is caused

Re: Re: heavy cleanup

2012-11-26 Thread Mark Struberg
Context as well... LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:15 PM > Subject: Re: Re: heavy cleanup > >T hat's all perfect Mark. > Thanks for the answer. >

Re: Re: heavy cleanup

2012-11-26 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
gt; > >On Nov 25, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > >> I again found a heavy bug which is caused by things like > >> > >> > >> //X TODO this MUST NOT be public! > >> public static ThreadLocal> > dependentInstanceOf

AW: Re: heavy cleanup

2012-11-25 Thread Mark Struberg
NOT be public! >> public static ThreadLocal> >> dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods = >> new ThreadLocal>(); >> >> >> Such code is pure PITA! >> >> >> I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trunk) and go for CDI-

Re: heavy cleanup

2012-11-25 Thread David Jencks
MUST NOT be public! > public static ThreadLocal>> > dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods = > new ThreadLocal>>(); > > > Such code is pure PITA! > > > I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trunk) and go for CDI-1.1 > directly

Re: heavy cleanup

2012-11-25 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
y get clarified > in CDI-1.1. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg > >Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 11:07 PM > >Subject: Re: heavy cleanup

Re: heavy cleanup

2012-11-25 Thread Mark Struberg
g >Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 11:07 PM >Subject: Re: heavy cleanup > > >Hi, > > >does the lifting prepare the CDI 1.1? >Or do we also want CDI 1.1 developments in? > > >I mean, does CDI 1.1 require a 1.2, 1.5 or 2.0? > > >Not sure it needs a

Re: heavy cleanup

2012-11-25 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
pache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 8:52 PM > > Subject: Re: heavy cleanup > > > > +1 > > > > Will we also target java 1.6 ? > > > > 2012/11/25 Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >> +1 > >> > >> All can b

Re: heavy cleanup

2012-11-25 Thread Mark Struberg
Cc: > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 8:52 PM > Subject: Re: heavy cleanup > > +1 > > Will we also target java 1.6 ? > > 2012/11/25 Romain Manni-Bucau > >> +1 >> >> All can be done independently now normally >> Le 25 nov. 2012 20:37, "Mark

Re: heavy cleanup

2012-11-25 Thread Thomas Andraschko
t; > > //X TODO this MUST NOT be public! > > public static ThreadLocal>> > > dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods = > > new ThreadLocal>>(); > > > > > > Such code is pure PITA! > > > > > > I'm really tempted to do a hea

Re: heavy cleanup

2012-11-25 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
eOfProducerMethods = > new ThreadLocal>>(); > > > Such code is pure PITA! > > > I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trunk) and go for > CDI-1.1 directly. The spec is good enough to give a rough direction atm and > we really need to cleanup tons of things! > > LieGrue, > strub >

heavy cleanup

2012-11-25 Thread Mark Struberg
I again found a heavy bug which is caused by things like     //X TODO this MUST NOT be public!     public static ThreadLocal>> dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods =     new ThreadLocal>>(); Such code is pure PITA! I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trun