Hmm, interesting edge case. For me it should be ignored until you make it
scanned using @Dependent or so. But fear it is quite undefined or
"interpretable"
Le 21 juil. 2017 21:10, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> I do something really lazy, I have an extension that has this method on it:
>
> public v
Misses @Dependent yes.
Le 21 juil. 2017 19:35, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
I have an interceptor defined as:
@Interceptor
@LoggedIn
@Priority(Interceptor.Priority.APPLICATION + 100)
public class LoggedInInterceptor {
and a beans.xml with
This interceptor isn't being discovered. It is discove
27;m not sure why you think it needs to have a bean
> defining annotation.
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:21 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, interesting edge case. For me it should be ignored until you make it
> > scanned using @Dependent or so. But
the
> spec http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/2.0/cdi-spec.html#enabled_interceptors
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:22 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Misses @Dependent yes.
> >
> > Le 21 juil. 2017 19:35, "John D. Ament" a écrit
> :
> >
g annotations.
>
> John, can you plz file a ticket!
>
> Txs and LieGrue,
> Strub
>
> > Am 21.07.2017 um 21:37 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >:
> >
> > Conflicts with annotated part i think. Priority doesnt enable a bean by
> > itself.
> >
>
While you accept scanning is undefined - Im not sure it can integrate the
spec cause all containers do it differently, even a single container can
have multiple modes :s - then a type was discovered means nothing except
for beans no?
Le 23 juil. 2017 16:09, "Eric Covener" a écrit :
> On Sun, Ju
Thanks Mark
Created OWB-1204
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.c
Hi Mark,
I would include the coming johnzon release and maybe do a 2.0.0 before the
2.0.1 ;)
But overall +1 to release
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g
oops, yes 2.0.1 ;)
Agreed with John for OWB, SE should be more tested before 2.0.1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm
Se code can work with arquillian tuning the scanner in owb.props but not
sure it does wirrh it if we cover the tests in standalone already. Wdyt?
Le 30 juil. 2017 22:29, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> Mark,
>
> Sure, its this TCK test in particular:
> https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi-tck/blob/2.0.0.
Just exclude these tests and remplace them by webbeans-se normal tests.
This is good enough and doesnt require arquillian hacks.
Le 30 juil. 2017 23:56, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:36 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Se code can work with arquillian tuning t
...
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE
Hi John
This ticket is not resolved right? For now you can use container properties
to do it. We can surely support more properties and also allow to override
default se services config from Strings but if not in the spec better to
not support it probably.
Le 1 août 2017 03:00, "John D. Ament"
Dont recall the whole details and 90% sure spec is not that closed on that
point but if you dont have an implicit default, direct type lookup doesnt
work but if another qualifier is set the *implicit* one (not default, only
default when implicit) should be stripped IMHO.
Le 6 août 2017 14:46, "Joh
Hi Mark,
it should work just adding a bval impl (see
https://github.com/apache/meecrowave/blob/trunk/integration-tests/beanvalidation/src/main/java/org/apache/meecrowave/beanvalidation/itest/Service.java)
since it is object based
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu
Le 14 août 2017 04:31, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
Hey guys
Good news on the SE support front. Looks like there were two features just
missing outright in OWB 2 from CDI 2.0.
- Support for a config property javax.enterprise.inject.implicit.scan which
works the opposite of org.apache.webbeans.sca
2017-08-14 13:50 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:03 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Le 14 août 2017 04:31, "John D. Ament" a écrit
> :
> >
> > Hey guys
> >
> > Good news on the SE support front. Looks like there we
testing etc without breaking their code.
Wdyt?
Le 15 août 2017 02:06, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:19 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > 2017-08-14 13:50 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1
+1 for se in 2.0.2 and 2.0.1 sooner
If you nees help for SE on something specific, feel free to ping me.
Le 15 août 2017 14:37, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> Oki, that seems to be a bit more work to be left still.
>
> I'd then suggest to go on with the immanent features and release OWB-2.0.1
> pr
+1
side note on meecrowave: I'd like to include johnzon N+1 as well since it
fixes an issue users often complain about (even if not blocking by itself)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
+0, don't care much since meecrowave is not bound to any EE version and its
lifecycle is independent. Also don't think people care much of these
versions after years of discussion in various projects. Just make it out ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannib
Hi,
+1, thanks Mark
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rm
Hmm
Does it passes TCK with your patch? Also wonder if we shouldnt get the impl
in some cases vs the signature. If tck are green im ok with it.
Le 10 sept. 2017 22:54, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm running some tests locally using OWB and Instance objects. I noticed
> that when the i
Surely the one to test:
https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi-tck/blob/master/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/cdi/tck/tests/lookup/injectionpoint/dynamic/DynamicInjectionPointTest.java
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.c
Not sure it is 100% related but looks like a bean without types so not even
sure @Named should be "matchable" since you dont match types at all (we
often used @Typed = @Vetoed in CDI 1.0)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Bl
Hey guys
We now can upgrade to 3.1.13 or 3.2. What our feeling here?
Tempted to say 3.2 but do i miss sthg?
pushed the upgrade on trunk, we can want (or not?) to create the geronimo
jaxrs 2.1 jar now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
no blocker to upgrade the version
I'd like to have OWB 2.0.2 (with request scope controller) in it though,
does that sound doable?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wor
Hi John,
you get a new InjectableBeanManager each time yes which is wrapping the
same BeanManagerImpl.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &
Then it means OWB is not started or the WebBeansFinder is not correct or
your classloader is not stable
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &
Welcome John!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau&
Hi
Can we revert it and add a flag - false by default - or a scope rule - new
ScopeRule(RequestScoped.class, ...) - to solve it.
Implicit start hides issues in actual deployment if not controllable.
-- Message transféré --
De :
Date : 10 oct. 2017 20:53
Objet : svn commit: r1
fixed it, can you have a look please?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedi
+1 and thanks a lot for it!
Side question: why CDI-SE? the controller is for EE as well I think
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-10-11 9:27 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> hi!
>
> We've increased the compat version of CXF to 3.2.0. Since this is backward
> incompatible with older versions I will raise the Meecrowave version from
change our default (cdiConversation = false)
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-78, after
investigation it seems it was touching only maven integration.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-10 0:39 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek :
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
Hi guys,
shouldnt
org.apache.webbeans.configurator.ObserverMethodConfiguratorImpl#read(javax.enterprise.inject.spi.ObserverMethod)
automatically fill notifyWith? ATM it is not self sufficient.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
; strub
>
> > Am 04.12.2017 um 17:08 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > shouldnt org.apache.webbeans.configurator.ObserverMethodConfiguratorImpl
> #read(javax..enterprise.inject.spi.ObserverMethod)
> > automatically fill notifyWith?
a écrit :
> usually not, isn't?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 05.12.2017 um 22:26 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >:
> >
> > Isnt notify adapted?
> >
> > Le 5 déc. 2017 21:23, "Mark Struberg" a
> écrit :
> >
> >&
Agree it is not covered but was weird to not inherit from "void
notify(EventContext eventContext)" if notifyWith was not already
called. Maybe something to clarify - no strong opinions for one or the
other while it is clear?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github
ngProducer
{
@Produces
public String[] produces()
{
return new String[] { "string" };
}
@Produces
public StringProducer[] produces2()
{
return new StringProducer[] { this };
}
}
}
Romain Manni-Bucau
Isn't it cause we reuse a generic producer?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https:/
pport java 9.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
20
s
> based on JAX-WS features, so there's no way to avoid the dependency.
>
This needs to be fixed yes but the way we are leading forward ;)
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:52 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I hope to get rid of the dependency comp
if you call get() can be yes. Happy to help if you can sort out a test like
the one i sent.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
+1, it was broken anyway as mentionned on IRC yesterday
Thought about that sorting by descendant (ascendant depending how you see
it) for specialized beans only which should reduce the cost a lot and be
deterministic so a big +1, thank you so much to drive this Mark!
Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi David
IIRC 3rd party beans - including @Produces - dont support producers (in the
spec) since there are fully let to the user. This is why deltaspike has
this partialbean interceptor support.
Le 20 déc. 2017 04:01, "David Blevins" a écrit :
Looks as though we don't support Interceptors or
without having to release OWB as something mandatory (or using 2
xbean asm shades)
2. this code has a lot of value for libs so could fit commons-proxy but
xbean is a good candidate since it owns the asm shade which is the critical
dependency
any opinion?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <ht
why i proposed
xbean.
We can wait a few jre releases to see if it hurst or not but migrations
phases are always a pain :(
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 20.12.2017 um 09:44 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > open question: wh
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
201
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
2017-12
Hi guys,
when do we plan to release next version?
Currently tomcat 9.0.3 is under vote so we can plan to follow it shortly.
On my side I'd like the junit 5 fix to be out ASAP since it is blocking
JUnit 5 usage without forking a class.
Any other concerns?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau &
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-92 done
open point is about johnzon Object serialization (allowing to serialize
primitives, collections or objects when type is Object). Do we want to fix
it before the next release or do we go like that?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <ht
yep and meecrowave got updated ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/
johnzon issue I spoke about we can want to include:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-154
all the todo are clear on my side for a release, anything we miss?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
+1
Side note: can you ensure it is either not deployed or staging repo are in
the pom to not break early consumers please?
Le 16 févr. 2018 13:19, "Mark Struberg" a
écrit :
> will roll a MW release in the afternoon.
>
> Currently testing the updates to the staged versions.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
g
> the d...
>
> happens only when this test is executed with all other tests.
> Wenn running the test alone all is green.
>
> Anyone want's to take that up?
> I'm offline for the next few hours now.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 16.02.2018 um 13
;
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>> Am 16.02.2018 um 14:31 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
>>
>> Hi Mark, can't reproduce it but used a johnzon 1.1.6 created from the
>> 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT since the tag is not pushed on asf yet. Not sure it has an
>> impact or if it is the
ue,
strub
> Am 17.02.2018 um 09:41 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> Le 16 févr. 2018 22:07, "Mark Struberg" a
> écrit :
>
> Hi Romain!
>
> Reinhard managed to reproduce the issue when running the latest MW source
> on his box.
>
> With git-bisect we figured i
What do you run? Always green here :(
Le 17 févr. 2018 11:51, "Mark Struberg" a
écrit :
> Yes, been deterministic. At my own box but also on Reinhards. Broken 100%
> of all runs.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 17.02.2018 um 11:16 schrieb Romain Manni-Buc
Can you share the 2 locking threads plz?
Le 17 févr. 2018 16:41, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a
écrit :
> What do you run? Always green here :(
>
> Le 17 févr. 2018 11:51, "Mark Struberg" a
> écrit :
>
>> Yes, been deterministic. At my own box but also
if we set it
hope it should fix most of the issues
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://w
gt;
>
> We need to figure out why your box is green.
> Which jdk do you use? and OS?
>
> Been here on MacBook + Java8-144 and Linux (Fedora27) also java8.
> Both broken..
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> On Saturday, 17 February 2018, 19:00:07 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>
Fixed, was related to some test order. A test was using cxf in a close
callback and creating a default bus since we already cleaned out bus. Issue
was that the default bus doesnt have johnzon etc and the test was using
jsonb.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu
+1 too
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
Hi John
The lookup is done depending your finder impl. By default it is by
classloader which means, if you dont end up using the same beanmanagerimpl,
you dont have the right tccl in different places - which has impacts as
well.
The wrapper instance is not that important here, only the delegate o
>> The lookup is done through the Finder. By default it's basically a
> > Map.
> > >> But you can change this to a custom one.
> > >>
> > >> Btw CDI.current() will always give you an InjectableBeanManager which
> > is basically a thin wrappe
maybe just a personnal feeling)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.c
Le 9 avr. 2018 02:33, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:33 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Is it in hammock? Did you force the webapp container to use the
> appclassloader in case of a secontainer?
>
How would I do that? You mean inside of Tomcat?
nder.getSingletonInstance();
> >
> >
> > And WebBeansFinder.getSingletonInstance() in turn again uses the TCCL to
> > look up the WebBeansContext.
> >
> > So even if you create a WebBeansContext with an explicit FinderService,
> it
> > would not make much d
2018-04-09 14:07 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 7:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > 2018-04-09 13:34 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
> >
> > > Yeah, I hit that. I was able to get around the listener issue, but
> then
> > > this
(singletonInstance).register(loader, context);
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
2018-04-09 16:37 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
> Did you mean ClassLoaderLock in meecrowave? Or something like the Rule
> defined by MonoMeecrowave?
>
> John
>
> On Mon, A
It actually works (check out the dom) but we don't have the icon-tip
class with an icon so just a css hack pby.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
2018-04-10 9:26 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Hi folks!
>
> Just became aware that TIP: d
gister the
> existing context for other classloaders:
>
> DefaultSingletonService.class.cast(singletonInstance).register(loader,
> context);
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>
>
> 2018-04-09 16:37 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
>
+1, there is another asm update in xbean which is not yet released, do
we want to include it or do we skip this one?
For OWB i'm quite limited in bandwidth but i can pby do another xbean
release this month.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
2018-
Some java 11 support and a few bugfixes. We can skip them but also
happy to try to push it if you want to put it in the scope.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
2018-04-13 17:39 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore :
> Thanks for the reply, Romain. Do
ich I suspect will be more difficult :-) )
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >
> wrote:
>
> > Some java 11 support and a few bugfixes. We can skip them but also
> > happy to try to push it if you want to put it in the scope.
> >
&g
FYI, xbean vote is running
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in
Hi Mark
Is it intended?
Logic was graceful shutdown (0), retry if not enough for some duration, and
if really not enough (bug in the app) kill 9 it.
It is coming from tomcat and we should keep it IMHO since it it sane. We
can add a 9 signal after the loop even without rorce but pby not before.
-
forget it, seems it works, read it wrong yesteday
we are all good, thks to have caught it!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
issue (of having the wrong default) writing an extension
where i register the exact types even for templates (Foo would have
registered Foo, Foo, ... as needed)
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
Oki, let me know if we can do it and I would be happy to do the change.
Alternatively - if we can't, maybe we should introduce that flag per jar or
extension potentially to enable a "mixed" app (to think if previous option
doesn't become possible).
Romain Manni-Bucau
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
+1
Le 29 avr. 2018 03:27, "Joseph Bergmark" a écrit :
> +1
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
> > good evening!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE to release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5.
> >
> > The following tickets got resolved
> >
> > Bug
> > • [OWB-1233] - Wrap
Think we (you can blame me ;)) never did the final step to be aligned on
tomcat here.
Long story short we must keep the same good default for all cases except
the bundle/zip case in its two forms (base=home or home != base).
In this last case we must just use the provided base.
Idea is to add --
Hi guys,
is it intended to not use a single singleton context
in org.apache.webbeans.corespi.se.DefaultContextsService and rely on a
threadlocal? sounds very wrong.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
Since I didn't get much feedback on that I'll add a standalone
contextsservice to not change the default one but happy to rework it later
to merge both once we got reviews.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawe
.
If anyone has some free time to do another pass and potentially merge a few
(@reta one for instance is ready to merge) it can be very good too.
I'll try to do another one if comments are fixed end of the week to try to
merge a few.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.co
Seems 2 last weeks (https://github.com/apache/meecrowave/pulls)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
Hi guys
Do we want to release johnzon before mv? Cxf and tomcat are on central so
we should be good to go after.
gitbox? otherwise we'll still not be able to integrate PR properly
+1 to split though
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.c
Hi guys,
Did you notice SSLHostConfig is reloadable?
Means we can have a let's encrypt extension!
Anyone motivated to hack it? If not i can give it a try after microprofile
work
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibuca
drop acme lib and just do it since we have a nice jaxrs client
and json lib
- find a way to test it somehow?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <http
Was hoping to review this lets encrypt stuff and potentialky recode it with
a jaxrs clieny before the release but not a blocker.
We need to validate sh on cygwin and bat before the release tough.
Le jeu. 5 juil. 2018 12:12, Mark Struberg a
écrit :
> hi folks!
>
> What about rolling a MW release
Hi guys,
pushed some PoC for lets encrypt integration. I don't have a domain anymore
ATM to test so I would be happy to get some help on that phase before we
release.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>
401 - 500 of 1508 matches
Mail list logo
