Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2

+1 regards, gerhard Am Mo., 29. Jan. 2024 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi lords and ladies! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-4.0.2 > > We fixed the following tickets > > Bug > [OWB-1436] - org.apache.webbeans.el22.WrappedValueExpressionNode'does not

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.14

+1 regards, gerhard Am Sa., 11. Jan. 2020 um 16:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > I've run all the tasks to release OWB 2.0.14 > > Here is the list of fixed bugs: > > Bug > > • [OWB-1280] - NPE in filterExcludedJars > • [OWB-1303] - AbstractOwbBean does not

Re: [DISCUSS] also move the Meecrowave repo to GITbox?

+1 regards, gerhard Am Do., 9. Mai 2019 um 08:52 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg : > > hi folks! > > Since we now already moved OWB itself and the meecrowave-examples, should we > also move Meecrowave to GIT? > This is affect the last remaining project sticking with SVN (except the site > which

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

> Le jeu. 9 mai 2019 à 22:31, Gerhard Petracek a > écrit : > > > hi romain, > > > > i've seen different (special) cases which would have been easier with > > such a spi - e.g. the integration of custom > > "module-binding"/qualifier/... concepts

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

;http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > >

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

h a SPI once we > > have qualifier feature or what it would bring. Do you have an example? > > > > That said adding a service and extracting that code is not super costly > > but semantically/design-ly not sure how to defend it yet. > > > > Le mer. 8 mai 2019 à 20:4

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

. regards, gerhard Am Mo., 6. Mai 2019 um 23:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Le lun. 6 mai 2019 à 22:51, Gerhard Petracek a > écrit : > > > my point was just to add a spi similar to the resource-injection spi... > > or maybe we can even unify the spi for all types of i

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

, HRB 4670 > > > Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > > > > > Nächste Konferenz: > > > > > > Java Forum Nord | Hannover | 24. September 2019 > > > > > > Nächste Akademie: > > > > > > API, Microservices

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

tember 2019 > > Nächste Akademie: > > API, Microservices & DDD Summit | München | 17. - 19. Juni 2019 > > Treffen Sie uns auf weiteren Konferenzen, > Summits und Events: > > Zu unseren weiteren Events > > > > Am 06.05.19, 14:06 schrieb "Gerhard

Re: Injection point for qualified points without @inject?

hi romain, some years ago i tried to do something similar (afair with owb 1.0.x) based on our plugin-spi. back then it was just possible via a plugin for resource-injection (and it was a bit "tricky"). if nothing changed in the meantime, we should take the chance to add a more powerful

Re: [DISCUSS] move OpenWebBeans core repo to GIT?

+1! regards, gerhard Am Fr., 3. Mai 2019 um 13:31 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg : > > hi folks! > > Do we want to move OWB core to GIT? > > wdyt? > > I'd be +1 > > LieGrue, > strub >

Re: SeContainer & Junit 5

+1 regards, gerhard Am Di., 16. Apr. 2019 um 17:49 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Sure > > @Cdi > class MyTest { > @Inject Mybean bean; > > @Test > void run() { > //... > } > } > > You can also select just a few beans in @Cdi to boost the deployment - by > default it is a

Re: [DISCUSS] move owb to Apache gitbox?

+1 regards, gerhard Am Sa., 29. Dez. 2018 um 17:16 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg : > hi folks! > > Do we finally want to move to gitbox? > > Our Meecrowave-examples are already there: > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave-examples > > I recommend the following additional 2 repos: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8

+1 regards, gerhard Am Mi., 7. Nov. 2018 um 17:40 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8 > > The following tickets got resolved: > > Bug > > [OWB-1257] - Conditional exclusion of beans in

Re: going for a 2.0.7 release this weekend?

+1 regards, gerhard Am Fr., 24. Aug. 2018 um 14:32 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > +1, all is already here for me :) > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.3

+1 regards, gerhard 2018-07-19 12:01 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi guys, > > Sorry for the fast release start but there are two clear blockers in 1.2.2 > so it would be awesome to get the 1.2.3 out ASAP. > > The diff is mainly fixing these two issues: > 1. Ensure base is not deleted

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.2

+1 regards, gerhard 2018-07-14 9:33 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > hi folks! > > I'd like to call a VOTE for releaseing Apache Meecrowave-1.2.2 > > The following bugs and improvements got resolved: > > Bug > • [MEECROWAVE-100] - exclude integration-test modules from > deployment >

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5

+1 regards, gerhard 2018-04-28 22:52 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > good evening! > > I'd like to call a VOTE to release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5. > > The following tickets got resolved > > Bug > • [OWB-1233] - WrappedValueExpression.equals(Object arg0) always

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.1

i've upgraded [1] to v1.2.1 and all tests look fine. -> +1 regards, gerhard [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaForkMicro 2018-02-26 22:40 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > > This is a vote for Microwave-1.2.1 > > The following bugs and tasks got resolved: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.2.0

+1 (i've tested it with ideafork-micro which is used in the upcoming chapter of [1]). regards, gerhard [1] http://cdiatwork.irian.at 2017-12-20 17:57 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > > I've also run the steps to release Meecrowave-1.2.0 > > The following

Re: configureProducerMethodSpecialization looks pretty much overcomplicated

+1 regards, gerhard 2017-12-19 9:01 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > > Currently refactoring the WebBeansUtil#configureProducerMethodSpecial > izations. > > This method is not easy to follow and could be seriously simplified. > > I already moved all the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.3

+1 regards, gerhard 2017-12-20 16:01 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > > I did run all steps to release OWB-2.0.3. > > We fixed the following bugs and improvements > > Bug > > [OWB-1171] - @Priority and @Alternative as sterotype > [OWB-1219] -

[jira] [Created] (MEECROWAVE-82) meecrowave-maven-plugin fails with bean-validation

Gerhard Petracek created MEECROWAVE-82: -- Summary: meecrowave-maven-plugin fails with bean-validation Key: MEECROWAVE-82 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-82 Project

Re: [meecrowave] disable cdiconversation by default?

+1 regards, gerhard 2017-11-09 15:36 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > CDI conversations are hardly usable anyway ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 09.11.2017 um 09:34 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > anyone of you uses

Re: Will run the mw 1.2.0 release tonight

+1 regards, gerhard 2017-10-05 11:38 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > And also will update to johnzon-1.1.4 before that. > CXF is already updated to 3.2.0 which will require people to update CXF > and JAX-RS api, so I'd prefer calling it 1.2.0. > > Any objections? > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-1.1.0

+1 regards, gerhard 2017-09-01 23:35 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi! > > Apache Meecrowave is a very small (9MB) EE based server. > It can run embeded, as single-jar app, or as a installable zip via > $> mvn meecrowave:bundle > Docs are at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1

+1 regards, gerhard 2017-08-29 11:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > > I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our > CDI-2.0 implementation. > We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2) > and a few Instance

Re: do a 2.0.1 release?

+1 regards, gerhard 2017-07-30 13:36 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Well, I was thinking about a OWB-2.0.1 release. > And of course then do a MW-2.0.0 or MW-1.1.0 (not sure anymore on what we > settled and which is better for MW). > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am

Re: VOTE Release Apache Meecrowave-1.0.0

+1 regards, gerhard 2017-07-08 0:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > > And finally Meecrowave-1.0.0! > This is a maintenance version for the EE7 compatible version. > It's actually the previous 0.3.2 work. We just moved to 1.0.0 to indicate > that it's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.4

+1 regards, gerhard 2017-07-08 0:05 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Dear lords and ladies! > > It's my pleasure to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.4. > This is a maintenance release of our CDI-1.2 branch and a drop in > replacement for OWB-1.7.3 > > The

Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?

Am 04.07.2017 um 15:32 schrieb Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org>: > > > > fyi @MEECROWAVE-50: > > it works with the latest snapshot > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2017-07-04 11:34 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gpetr

Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?

fyi @MEECROWAVE-50: it works with the latest snapshot regards, gerhard 2017-07-04 11:34 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org>: > hi romain, > > it should be possible to reproduce it with any demo, however, you could > use e.g. [1]. > (it uses v0.3.1, but also

[jira] [Updated] (MEECROWAVE-50) meecrowave-maven-plugin is not portable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated MEECROWAVE-50: --- Affects Version/s: (was: 1.0.0) 0.3.1 Fix

[jira] [Resolved] (MEECROWAVE-50) meecrowave-maven-plugin is not portable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek resolved MEECROWAVE-50. Resolution: Fixed it works with the latest snapshot > meecrowave-maven-plu

Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?

Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-07-04 11:08 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org>: > > > imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well. > > -> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50). > >

Re: [DISCUSS] time to release Meecrowave-1.0.0 from the maintenance branch?

imo MEECROWAVE-50 needs to be part of v1 as well. -> +1 for a release, but not for v1 (without MEECROWAVE-50). regards, gerhard 2017-07-03 16:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Yes and no (until you hit it I guess). > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1194

Re: [discuss] meecrowave dev/prod setup

n so not > sure which blocker you hit. Can you detail it please? > > Le 2 juil. 2017 22:56, "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > hi @ all, > > > > i'm currently using meecrowave for the upcoming chapter of cdi@work. > > i'm

[discuss] meecrowave dev/prod setup

hi @ all, i'm currently using meecrowave for the upcoming chapter of cdi@work. i'm quite happy with it, however, imo we should improve one area. i would like to show a starter similar to [1]. that's a fast alternative to the maven-plugin (as well as the runner-jar). however, using this approach

[jira] [Created] (MEECROWAVE-50) meecrowave-maven-plugin is not portable

Gerhard Petracek created MEECROWAVE-50: -- Summary: meecrowave-maven-plugin is not portable Key: MEECROWAVE-50 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-50 Project: Meecrowave

Re: OWB-2.0.0 to be released soon

sounds great! i'm going to test the snapshot soon. regards, gerhard 2017-06-17 22:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Yes, it should 'just work' afaict. > We even kept the SPI the same. > We most likely will add an async event related API for better integration > within

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1192) update logic for Instance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1192: -- Description: new parts: * Instance ** #stream ** #isResolvable * BeanManager#createInstance

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1188) implement async events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1188: -- Description: new parts: * Event#fireAsync * @ObservesAsync * ObserverMethod#isAsync

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1189) add new parts to the event-api

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1189: -- Description: new parts: * EventContext * NotificationOptions/ImmutableNotificationOptions

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1193) implement InterceptionFactory

Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1193: - Summary: implement InterceptionFactory Key: OWB-1193 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1193 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1189) add new parts to the event-api

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1189: -- Component/s: (was: Core) Events > add new parts to the event-

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1188) implement async events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1188: -- Component/s: (was: Core) Events > implement async eve

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1192) update logic for Instance

Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1192: - Summary: update logic for Instance Key: OWB-1192 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1192 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1189) add new parts to the event-api

Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1189: - Summary: add new parts to the event-api Key: OWB-1189 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1189 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1188) implement async events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1188: -- Description: new parts: * Event#fireAsync * ObservesAsync * ObserverMethod#isAsync was: new

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1187) implement configurators

Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1187: - Summary: implement configurators Key: OWB-1187 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1187 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1185) implement Annotated#getAnnotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1185: -- Description: + default implementations in: * AnnotatedConstructor * AnnotatedField

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1186) implement new methods of bootstrapping-events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1186: -- Description: new methods: AfterBeanDiscovery #addBean() #addObserverMethod() AfterTypeDiscovery

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1186) implement new methods of bootstrapping-events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1186: -- Description: new methods: AfterBeanDiscovery #addBean() #addObserverMethod() AfterTypeDiscovery

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1186) implement new methods of bootstrapping-events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1186: -- Summary: implement new methods of bootstrapping-events (was: implement new methods

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1186) implement new methods of AfterBeanDiscovery

Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1186: - Summary: implement new methods of AfterBeanDiscovery Key: OWB-1186 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1186 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1185) implement Annotated#getAnnotations

Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1185: - Summary: implement Annotated#getAnnotations Key: OWB-1185 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1185 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Sub-task

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.3

i've upgraded [1] to v1.7.3 and all tests look fine. -> +1 regards, gerhard [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork 2017-04-16 0:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > I've run the tasks to ship OWB 1.7.3. > > The following bugs got fixed > > Bug > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave-0.2.0

the source-zip looks fine -> +1 regards, gerhard 2017-01-04 13:18 GMT+01:00 Reinhard Sandtner : > +1 > > lg > reini > > > Am 04.01.2017 um 09:20 schrieb Mark Struberg >: > > > > checked the following: > > > > * sig > > * sha1 > > *

[jira] [Reopened] (OWB-1121) IllegalStateException in case of duplicated classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek reopened OWB-1121: --- see the voting thread for v1.6.3 > IllegalStateException in case of duplicated clas

Re: WARNING for duplicated interceptors

hi, i would prefer an info which shows the final order (of interceptors,...) including skipped configs due to such a (valid) redundancy. -> with that we get an additional benefit (for users). regards, gerhard 2016-07-08 12:27 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi guys >

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1130) ContainerCtrlTckTest fails

Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1130: - Summary: ContainerCtrlTckTest fails Key: OWB-1130 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1130 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Affects

Re: seteventfired too early?

er > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-04-14 18:10 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org>: > > > +1 for changing it (otherwise we break ds-partial-beans) > > > > regards, > >

Re: seteventfired too early?

+1 for changing it (otherwise we break ds-partial-beans) regards, gerhard 2016-03-20 15:03 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi guys, > > any reason to consider the event fired before firing it there: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-1.6.3

. This is fine to release then. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitrib

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-1.6.3

we shouldn't release it (as it is), because deltaspike-cdictrl-owb fails with it (v1.6.2 passes). regards, gerhard 2016-02-16 23:17 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi! > > I’ve performed the steps to release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.3 > > The staging repo can be found here: > >

Re: release OWB next week?

+1 regards, gerhard 2016-02-13 13:09 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko : > +1 > > 2016-02-13 12:56 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > > > +1 then we release tomee > > Le 13 févr. 2016 12:29, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > > > > > hi

Re: moving to owb-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT?

+1 for 1.7 imo there is no need to stick with 1.6.x regards, gerhard 2016-01-31 16:42 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko : > +1 for 1.7 > but as romain said, i'm also very sure this is rarely used by users. > > 2016-01-31 16:26 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg

Re: [DISCUSS] moving OpenWebBeans to GIT?

+1 regards, gerhard 2016-01-23 11:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi! > > What do you think about moving openwebbeans to GIT. > Of course hosted at the ASF. > > Would probably be helpful when working on the CDI-2.0 branch in the future. > > LieGrue, > strub > >

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1095) Beans not fully initialized in AfterBeanDiscovery or InjectionPoint validation to early?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960743#comment-14960743 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-1095: --- the issue is in InjectionResolver. it contains an empty value

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1095) Beans not fully initialized in AfterBeanDiscovery or InjectionPoint validation to early?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960754#comment-14960754 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-1095: --- no - the empty value is stored too early in that case

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OWB-1095) Beans not fully initialized in AfterBeanDiscovery or InjectionPoint validation to early?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960754#comment-14960754 ] Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-1095 at 10/16/15 2:04 PM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OWB-1095) Beans not fully initialized in AfterBeanDiscovery or InjectionPoint validation to early?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960754#comment-14960754 ] Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-1095 at 10/16/15 2:07 PM

Re: starting with CDI-2.0?

+1 regards, gerhard 2015-08-11 13:58 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi folks! What about starting with implementing CDI-2.0? The spec is of course not finished but I’d like to be a bit more bleeding edge than last time ;) I’ll start with copying over the geronimo-jcdi spec

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-1.6.2

+1 regards, gerhard 2015-08-07 22:03 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE for a maintenance release of Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.2. We fixed 2 bugs which are needed by TomEE-7.x Here is the staging repo:

[jira] [Reopened] (OWB-935) wrong result of javax.enterprise.inject.Instance in combination with alternatives

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek reopened OWB-935: -- wrong result of javax.enterprise.inject.Instance in combination with alternatives

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-935) wrong result of javax.enterprise.inject.Instance in combination with alternatives

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645953#comment-14645953 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-935: -- see the 3 tests - two of them fail wrong

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OWB-935) wrong result of javax.enterprise.inject.Instance in combination with alternatives

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645953#comment-14645953 ] Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-935 at 7/29/15 12:57 PM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OWB-935) wrong result of javax.enterprise.inject.Instance in combination with alternatives

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645953#comment-14645953 ] Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-935 at 7/29/15 12:57 PM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OWB-935) wrong result of javax.enterprise.inject.Instance in combination with alternatives

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645953#comment-14645953 ] Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-935 at 7/29/15 12:20 PM

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1085) bootstrapping events observed outside of extension-implementations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1085: -- Attachment: OWB-1085.zip bootstrapping events observed outside of extension-implementations

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1085) bootstrapping events observed outside of extension-implementations

Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1085: - Summary: bootstrapping events observed outside of extension-implementations Key: OWB-1085 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1085 Project: OpenWebBeans

Re: [VOTE] for Apache OpenWebBeans 1.6.1

+1 regards, gerhard 2015-06-18 8:46 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: +1 from me. LieGrue, strub Am 16.06.2015 um 08:10 schrieb Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.1. The staging repository is here

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1078) create Dockerfiles for installing OpenWebBeans as Docker Image based on Tomcat8

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1078: -- Issue Type: New Feature (was: Bug) create Dockerfiles for installing OpenWebBeans as Docker

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-1081) check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek resolved OWB-1081. --- Resolution: Fixed check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OWB-1081) check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14571898#comment-14571898 ] Gerhard Petracek edited comment on OWB-1081 at 6/4/15 12:34 AM

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1081) check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14571898#comment-14571898 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-1081: --- in ObserverMethodImpl#notify {code

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1081) check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context

Gerhard Petracek created OWB-1081: - Summary: check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context Key: OWB-1081 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1081 Project: OpenWebBeans

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1081) check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-1081: -- Attachment: OWB-1081.patch check Reception.IF_EXISTS in case of an inactive context

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.0

i've upgraded several projects to v1.6.0 (e.g. [1] and [2]) and all tests look fine. - +1 regards, gerhard [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork [2] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary 2015-06-01 17:29 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-654) manual lookups of beans with generics fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-654: - Attachment: OWB-654_test.zip manual lookups of beans with generics fail

[jira] [Reopened] (OWB-654) manual lookups of beans with generics fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek reopened OWB-654: -- Assignee: Mark Struberg (was: Gerhard Petracek) manual lookups of beans with generics fail

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-654) manual lookups of beans with generics fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14563477#comment-14563477 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on OWB-654: -- please have a look at the test and compare

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.8

i've upgraded several projects to v1.2.8 (e.g. [1] and [2]) and all tests look fine. - +1 regards, gerhard [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork [2] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary 2015-04-22 15:37 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg

Re: a new OWB-1.2.x release?

+1 regards, gerhard 2015-04-22 14:03 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com: +1 2015-04-22 14:01 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi folks! We got a few requests to ship a new 1.2.x release. If there is no objection then I gonna start with the release

Re: [VOTE] take 2 - Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.5.0

+1 regards, gerhard 2015-04-15 21:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi! Another round of release bingo ;) It’s a great pleasure - again :) - to call a second VOTE for releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.5.0. OWB-1.5.x is the first version to support CDI-1.2 which is a

[jira] [Reopened] (OWB-798) expensive check in EventUtil#checkEventBindings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek reopened OWB-798: -- the check is still in place (and slow) expensive check in EventUtil#checkEventBindings

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-798) expensive check in EventUtil#checkEventBindings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated OWB-798: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5.0) 1.5.1 expensive check in EventUtil

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.5.0

i did further tests and the issue isn't specific to jetty. - +1 for fixing the issue before releasing v1.5.0. regards, gerhard 2015-04-13 10:16 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com: I get following error when starting with trunk (i think there are currently no changes?)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.5.0

i've upgraded several projects to v1.5.0 (e.g. [1] and [2]) and all tests look fine. - +1 regards, gerhard [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork [2] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary 2015-04-13 23:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg

Re: preparing to release owb-1.5.0

+1 regards, gerhard 2015-04-09 19:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi folks! FINALLY I like to get OWB-1.5.0 out of the door. We now pass the TCK for JavaSE as well as the web-profile TCK (within TomEE). Time to get some real feedback apart from all the people who use their

  1   2   3   4   >