Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating-rc1: OpenWhisk Composer

To update on this, after 7 days we are still waiting for enough binding votes on the IPMC mailing list thread [1] to be able to officially release this package. --dave [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b5565c5d0ab8541193fd021876185f86e5f1f09b8995d7990d8bd921@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.or

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating-rc1: OpenWhisk Composer

:Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating-rc1: OpenWhisk Composer This vote is now closed. It has passed with 4 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 notes. Binding: + 1 Rodric Rabbah +1 Bertrand Delacretaz +1 Carlos Santana +1 Tyson Norris I will now proceed

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating-rc1: OpenWhisk Composer

This vote is now closed. It has passed with 4 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 notes. Binding: + 1 Rodric Rabbah +1 Bertrand Delacretaz +1 Carlos Santana +1 Tyson Norris I will now proceed with a call to vote on the IPMC mailing list. thanks, --dave On 2018/11/20 19:30:19, "David P Grove" w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating-rc1: OpenWhisk Composer

+1 on the release. Just verified the checklist as well. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:01 AM Tyson Norris wrote: > +1 to release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk composer > > Verified checklist > > Thanks > Tyson > > On 11/20/18, 11:30 AM, "David P Grove" wrote: > > > > This is call

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating-rc1: OpenWhisk Composer

+1 to release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk composer Verified checklist Thanks Tyson On 11/20/18, 11:30 AM, "David P Grove" wrote: This is call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk composer List of JIRA ticket(s)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating-rc1: OpenWhisk Composer

+1 to release openwhisk-composer-0.9.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz verified using checklist -- Carlos On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 4:06 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:30 PM David P Grove wrote: > >... This is call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk > > 0.9.0-in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating-rc1: OpenWhisk Composer

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:30 PM David P Grove wrote: >... This is call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk > 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk composer.. +1 for the release of openwhisk-composer-0.9.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz with SHA512= 7d5ecb65df653840c8a33c7bddf346ad2aa36507dd1d6de68cb9

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating-rc1: OpenWhisk Composer

[x] +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: openwhisk composer Checklist for reference: [x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [x] DISCLAIMER is included. [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. (Doesn’t really apply?)

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating-rc1: OpenWhisk Composer

This is call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk composer List of JIRA ticket(s) resolved for this release can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-227. To learn more about Apache OpenWhisk, please visit https://openwhisk.apache.org/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk Deploy Kube

quot; ---08/23/2018 11:43:56 > PM---Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release o]"Vincent S > Hou" ---08/23/2018 11:43:56 PM---Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote > for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWh > > From: "Vincent S Hou"

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway

/31/2018 06:36PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk client go and CLI Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk client go and CLI. List of JIRA ticket(s) resolved for this release can be found at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway

, Phone: +1(919)254-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -"Vincent S Hou" wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: "Vincent S Hou" Date: 08/23/2018 06:00PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: Op

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk Deploy Kube

I vote: +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: openwhisk deploy kube I have verified all items on the checklist. --dave From: "Vincent S Hou" To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Date: 08/23/2018 11:43 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk Deploy Kube

Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk Deploy Kube. List of JIRA ticket(s) resolved for this release can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-219. To learn more about Apache OpenWhisk, please visit https:/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway

...@us.ibm.com, Phone: +1(919)254-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -"Vincent S Hou" wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: "Vincent S Hou" Date: 08/21/2018 02:49PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway

Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -Justin Halsall wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: Justin Halsall Date: 08/23/2018 04:00PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway I vote +1 Release as Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway

t;Vincent S Hou" > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > Date: 08/21/2018 02:49 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk > catalog and apigateway > > > > > Hi everyone, > > This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache Ope

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway

credentials.json.enc in the catalog src tar file. Should this file be in the release? What is its purpose? --dave From: "Vincent S Hou" To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Date: 08/21/2018 02:49 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway

I vote +1 -Matt matthew.ham...@gmail.com On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 9:04 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm surprised that nobody is voting on this - voting on releases is > not only for mentors, it's an essential function of Apache projects > that podlings need to practice. It's not har

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway

Hi, I'm surprised that nobody is voting on this - voting on releases is not only for mentors, it's an essential function of Apache projects that podlings need to practice. It's not hard ;-) Not much fun either maybe, but https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/success-at-apache-the-apache1 help

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway

Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway. List of JIRA ticket(s) resolved for this release can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-218. To learn more about Apache OpenWhisk, please vis

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk client go and CLI

: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -Forwarded by Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM on 08/05/2018 10:11PM - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM Date: 07/31/2018 06:36PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk client go and CLI

y) -"Vincent S Hou" wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: "Vincent S Hou" Date: 08/01/2018 06:36AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk client go and CLI Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenW

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk client go and CLI

Hi Vincent, Thanks for working to create a release for the CLI and API client as we need this (officially) to work with the release of the platform code. I am all in favor of working to release, eventually together, all the components that have compatibility considerations (which should be for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk client go and CLI

e.org From: "Vincent S Hou" Date: 08/01/2018 06:36AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk client go and CLI Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk client go and CLI. List of JIRA ticket(

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc1: OpenWhisk client go and CLI

Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk client go and CLI. List of JIRA ticket(s) resolved for this release can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-215. To learn more about Apache OpenWhisk, please visit h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

I vote +1.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM Date: 07/03/2018 02:55PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module Hi everyone, This is to

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

"...Please count my vote as well (binding)..." Same for me. From: Matt Rutkowski Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 4:11:23 PM To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module Pl

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

> -Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM wrote: ----- > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > From: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM > Date: 07/03/2018 02:55PM > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk > module > > Hi everyone, > > This is to call for

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

-Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM Date: 07/03/2018 02:55PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, Phone: +1(919)254-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -"Priti Desai" wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: "Priti Desai" Date: 07/10/2018 03:30PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

repo. [X] All files have license headers if necessary. [X] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. dragos From: Priti Desai Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 12:30:26 PM To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

. [X] All files have license headers if necessary. [O] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. Cheers Priti From: Rodric Rabbah To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Date: 07/10/2018 08:34 AM Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

archive. > > > Best regards > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > -"Vincent S Hou" wrote: - > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > From: "Vincent S Hou" > Date: 07/04/2018 02:55AM > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

. [X] All files have license headers if necessary. [X] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) -"Vincent S Hou" wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: "Vincent S Hou" Date: 07/04/2018 02:55AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

I also vote +1 to release OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2 module. Checklist for reference: [ X ] Download links are valid. (Please disregard the md5 link, since we do not need it) [ X ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [ X ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

Hello everyone, I also vote +1 to release OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2 module. Checklist for reference: [ X ] Download links are valid. (Please disregard the md5 link, since we do not need it) [ X ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [ X ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

Hello all, I vote +1 as well to release OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2 module Checklist for reference: [ X ] Download links are valid.(Please disregard the md5 link, since we do not need it) [ X ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [ X ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

I vote: +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating Checklist for reference: [ X ] Download links are valid. [ X ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [ X ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [ X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

-- To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: "David P Grove" Date: 07/03/2018 06:22PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module I vote +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating Checklist for reference: [ X ] Download links are valid. [ X

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

I vote +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating Checklist for reference: [ X ] Download links are valid. [ X ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [ X ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [ X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -Rodric Rabbah wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: Rodric Rabbah Date: 07/03/2018 03:04PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module This was removed: > On Ju

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

This was removed: > On Jul 3, 2018, at 2:55 PM, Vincent S Hou wrote: > > > The MD5 checksum for each artifact can be found via: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz.md5 > >

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module

Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating rc2: main OpenWhisk module. We have resolved all the issues regarding the dependency's license, gradle wrapper, some documentation issues, etc, based on we discussed during last voting mail thread for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

llis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -"Vincent S Hou" wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: "Vincent S Hou" Date: 06/29/2018 03:11PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module Correction: We removed the gradle wrapper

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -Luciano Resende wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: Luciano Resende Date: 06/29/2018 08:36AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module We are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

/2018 08:36AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module We are recommending not to use MD5 anymore, so before going to IPMC please delete that. The source tar file extracts to incubator-openwhisk without the version info, which might be overwritten by next

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:29 AM Vincent S Hou wrote: > This is the key, which is used by the Travis job. The private key is > encrypted in the repo of incubator-openwhisk-release. > > For further releases, what email and u

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

From: Luciano Resende Date: 06/29/2018 08:36AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module We are recommending not to use MD5 anymore, so before going to IPMC please delete that. The source tar file extracts to incubator-openwhisk without the version info

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:29 AM Vincent S Hou wrote: > This is the key, which is used by the Travis job. The private key is > encrypted in the repo of incubator-openwhisk-release. > > For further releases, what email and use id can we use? Do we have them > handy somewhere? @Bertrand, do you have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

s...@us.ibm.com, > Phone: +1(919)254-7182 > Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States > > -Rodric Rabbah wrote: - > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > From: Rodric Rabbah > Date: 06/29/2018 08:04AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

: Rodric Rabbah Date: 06/29/2018 08:04AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module As Bertrand wrote: gpg: Signature made Mon Jun 25 23:11:21 2018 CEST using RSA key ID 22CC20CC > gpg: Good signature from "OpenWhisk Release Bot (Release of O

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

We are recommending not to use MD5 anymore, so before going to IPMC please delete that. The source tar file extracts to incubator-openwhisk without the version info, which might be overwritten by next release. Most of the ansible files do not have the full Apache License header, but something lik

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

As Bertrand wrote: gpg: Signature made Mon Jun 25 23:11:21 2018 CEST using RSA key ID 22CC20CC > gpg: Good signature from "OpenWhisk Release Bot (Release of OpenWhisk) > " [unknown] > The key does not appear to be verified. Further can we not use an @ apache.org email address vs this gmail id (wh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

+1 on the release. Done validation on Mac [X] Download links are valid. [0] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. (did not verify on this point iteration) [X] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

+1 on the release. I verified that sources built on MacOS and checked the following items: [ X ] Download links are valid. [ X ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [ X ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [ X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) -"Vincent S Hou" wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: "Vincent S Hou" Date: 06/26/2018 05:27AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

+1 on this release. Checklist for reference: [X] Download links are valid. [0] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. (did not verify on this point iteration) [X] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

Hi, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:22 AM Markus Thoemmes wrote: ... > - [✓] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. (Other than gradlew.jar) > Is there a procedure to verify the last point? I quickly did a find for jar > files and a find for executable files... I also use find + file to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

Hey, +1 on releasing this! Checklist for reference: - [✓] Download links are valid. - [✓] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. - [✓] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. - [✓] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo. - [✓] All files have l

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

Hey~ Since I am on the biz trip, I am a bit late. Definitely +1 on this. Great work~! Vincent. I tried all things based on the guide and found all things correct except one small thing. Regarding the following part in the guide, I think those commands should run under "incubator-openwhisk/ansibl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

+1 > [✓] +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release and the reason > > Checklist for reference: > [✓] Download links are valid. > [✓] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. *I wasn’t able to get the mit pgpkeys server to respond to a request for t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

I vote +1 Checklist for reference: - [X] Download links are valid. - [X] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. - [X] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. - [X] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo. - [X] All files have license headers if

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [X] +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 Do not release and the reason Checklist for reference: [X] Download links are valid. [0] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. (did not verify on this point iteration) [X] S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

I vote +1 Checklist: - [x] Download links are valid. - [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. - [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. - [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo. - [x] All files have license headers if necessary. $ p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:27 PM Vincent S Hou wrote: > ...This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk > 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module +1 for the release of openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz with SHA512()= 26d19d92ef4b4cf14f42fc0d425faaeb914690fcafb3dce

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module

Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module. List of JIRA ticket(s) resolved for this release can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-213. To learn more about Apache OpenWhisk, please visit https:/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

@openwhisk.apache.org From: Bertrand Delacretaz Date: 06/23/2018 05:39AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating Hi Rodric, On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:52 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Vincent S Hou wrote: > > ...I mean if only release this go

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

: s...@us.ibm.com, Phone: +1(919)254-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -Chetan Mehrotra wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: Chetan Mehrotra Date: 06/25/2018 06:40AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

> Based on all the discussion on a VOTE mail thread, we can go with the release of one module, which the main openwhisk module, for the initial Apache release @Vincent Looking at current released artifacts it appears we are only releasing source tars. Going forward we should look into including Ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

Hi Rodric, On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:52 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Vincent S Hou wrote: > > ...I mean if only release this go client code, there is nothing we can run > > it against. > And that is entirely fine per all the ASF docs I’ve read. Is there a > require

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

Hi Matt, On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 6:20 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote: > ...I am fine with making it "easier" for the Incubator board... Nitpicking: there is no "Incubator Board" - there's the Incubator PMC, which will review the OpenWhisk releases, and the Apache Software Foundation Board, which has no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

ve" wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: "David P Grove" Date: 06/22/2018 09:39AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating +1 --dave Carlos Santana ---06/22/2018 09:23:55 AM---I will take Bertrand's mentorship advice and release 1 module T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

I am fine with making it "easier" for the Incubator board, but we should at least be ingenuous and release the main openwhisk repo. IMO If this is about making sure that they review our process/methodology/conformance then 1 repo. will do, but we should quickly follow with the other 12 (which

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

+1 --dave From: Carlos Santana To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Date: 06/22/2018 09:23 AM Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating I will take Bertrand's mentorship advice and release 1 module This is just to go thru the ASF release process and votin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

I will take Bertrand's mentorship advice and release 1 module This is just to go thru the ASF release process and voting. To verify that the source code is free from legal problems, and follows all the legal requirements We just need to go thru one round with the IPMC and explain that this is our

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

> On Jun 22, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Vincent S Hou wrote: > > I mean if only release this go client code, there is nothing we can run it > against. And that is entirely fine per all the ASF docs I’ve read. Is there a requirement that the code must be functional in some extended capacity? The ASF

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

Allen wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: Rob Allen Date: 06/22/2018 01:46AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating > On 22 Jun 2018, at 05:14, Vincent S Hou wrote: > > Great thanks to folks with votes and the comments. Wow, a lot happened on my t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, Phone: +1(919)254-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -Rodric Rabbah wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: Rodric Rabbah Date: 06/22/2018 03:40AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

"Vincent S Hou" wrote on 06/21/2018 10:14:46 PM: > > Except the issues we have above, does anyone have any other concerns > we need to take into account for the 0.9.0 release? If so, this is > the chance to raise it; if not, we shall proceed the, after we made > the minor fixes to the above list

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

hisk.apache.org From: "Vincent S Hou" Date: 06/21/2018 05:16AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating Hi everyone, This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating. List of JIRA ticket(s) resolved for this release can be found at https:/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:08 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote: > ...the main openwhisk README (and supporting) docs include > instructions on how to build (and tooling that makes it quite easy). We > can open an issue to better document suggest manual build order Sounds good, and if there's a master

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:41 AM Rodric Rabbah wrote: > ...As long as the ASF incubator people are happy with a release that doesn’t > have the > org.apache.openwhisk.* package name, it all seems fine > Can we find out by asking first before getting slammed later?.. Initial podling releases w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:40 AM Rodric Rabbah wrote: > ...I looked through https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-go > and it is the entirely self contained - > all go code, no deps on other openwhisk repos Sounds like a good candidate for a first Incubator release indeed. -Be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

> As long as the ASF incubator people are happy with a release that doesn’t > have the org.apache.openwhisk.* package name, it all seems fine. Can we find out by asking first before getting slammed later? -r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

> It’s reasonable to assume that when it goes to the Incubator people, they are > going to have another list of items to address that are again nothing to do > with the operation of the code. Quite likely - I’m of the same opinion. So reducing the surface makes sense to me. Getting through all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

> On 22 Jun 2018, at 05:14, Vincent S Hou wrote: > > Great thanks to folks with votes and the comments. Wow, a lot happened on my travel day! > As a recap of current replies we have received, we have opened a list of > issues to be fixed for OpenWhisk in the coming release or further releas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

t; Date: 06/21/2018 12:08PM Cc: "Vincent S Hou" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating Hi Bertrand, >>>> ...Plus a single repo. source is not usable by itself and its build dependent >>>> on the other parts as I mentioned earlier... &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

+1 for 0.9.0-incubating time to write a book on it :) -- Michele Sciabarra openwh...@sciabarra.com On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, at 8:24 PM, James Thomas wrote: > +1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating. > > Good work on this everyone. Time to get the 🍾🍾🍾 ready > > On 21 June 2018 at 1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

+1 Release as Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating. Good work on this everyone. Time to get the 🍾🍾🍾 ready On 21 June 2018 at 17:35, Priti Desai wrote: > +1 for the release, its been a lot of hard work from the team, great job > Matt, Vincent, and Daisy! > > Cheers > Priti > > -- Regards, Ja

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

+1 for the release, its been a lot of hard work from the team, great job Matt, Vincent, and Daisy! Cheers Priti

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

can open an issue to better document suggest manual build order. Will talk to Vincent to see if he has time today as I am leaving soon to return Monday. -mr From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Date: 06/21/2018 11:00 AM Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

Hi Matt, On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:27 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote: > ...Are you saying you believe the Incubator PMC > will fail us strictly due to having 13 tgz/tar files vs. 1 for a first > release?... I don't know (and someone's welcome to ask on the general@incubator.a.o list to find out), but th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

o: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > Date: 06/21/2018 10:17 AM > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating > > > > Hi Matt, > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:03 PM Matt Rutkowski > wrote: > > ...For now, I am quite happy with releasing all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

by itself and its build dependent on the other parts as I mentioned earlier. Kind regards, Matt From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Date: 06/21/2018 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating Hi Matt, On Thu, Jun 21, 2018

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

dev@openwhisk.apache.org Date: 06/21/2018 09:45 AM Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating Thanks Betrand, You saved me time today :yay: ! Yeah the renaming of the scala packages, should not be a show stopper but we should open an issue in the release repo t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

Hi Matt, On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:03 PM Matt Rutkowski wrote: > ...For now, I am quite happy with releasing all together We can try, but as I said I'm not sure if the Incubator PMC will accept this for a first release. Even releasing a single module that's not usable by itself is progress

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

Hi Bertrand, I do not believe we should (or can) release just one repo. at this time (my vote is continue with current artifact granularity). In the future, we can work to enable individual repo. release over time as well (describe via process/tools), but most of these repos. must be released t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

Thanks Betrand, You saved me time today :yay: ! Yeah the renaming of the scala packages, should not be a show stopper but we should open an issue in the release repo to track. Also needs some coordination for own modules that depends on it and downstreams. We can release 0.9.0, and after release

  1   2   >