Re: Fwd: 2.0.0-RC2 ScratchFileBuffer not closed!

Begin forwarded message: From: Adam Retter <adam.ret...@googlemail.com> Date: 1 December 2015 at 16:16:31 GMT-8 To: us...@pdfbox.apache.org Subject: 2.0.0-RC2 ScratchFileBuffer not closed! Hey guys, Using either 2.0.0-RC1 or 2.0.0-RC2 I am seeing a lot of debug messages which loo

[jira] [Closed] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Hewson closed PDFBOX-3133. --- Resolution: Not A Problem This issue has wandered off-topic so I'm closing it. > PDFBox 2.0.0-

Fwd: 2.0.0-RC2 ScratchFileBuffer not closed!

Timo, any thoughts on this? — John > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Adam Retter <adam.ret...@googlemail.com> > Date: 1 December 2015 at 16:16:31 GMT-8 > To: us...@pdfbox.apache.org > Subject: 2.0.0-RC2 ScratchFileBuffer not closed! > > Hey guys, > > U

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

setImageableArea(0, 0, paper.getWidth(), paper.getHeight()); pageFormat.setPaper(paper); return pageFormat; } Regards Sridhar Sowmiyanarayanan Tata Consultancy Services Mailto: sridhar...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

(), paper.getHeight()); pageFormat.setPaper(paper); return pageFormat; } Regards Sridhar Sowmiyanarayanan Tata Consultancy Services Mailto: sridhar...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with syste

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

that you get in your implementation of the java.awt.print.Printable interface. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

/tools/PDFToImage.java to a method and use or any API available? Q3: Are there PDFBox code/API to print PNG file or need to do only in java.awt.print? Regards Sridhar > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

a writeImage method with an OutputStream. Q3: only awt If the image is pure black and white, then I recommend TIF, this makes even smaller files than PNG. You'll need jai_imageio.jar. But start with PNG first. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with sy

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

tch (IOException e) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e.printStackTrace(); } } } > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

be included within "{{code}}...{{code}}", this looks nicer in JIRA. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lo

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

be included within "{{code}}...{{code}}", this looks nicer in JIRA. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lo

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

can be included within curly-bracket curly-bracket code curly-bracket curly-bracket yourcode curly-bracket curly-bracket code curly-bracket curly-bracket , this looks nicer in JIRA. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems havi

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

ll get you the performance indices. Since we are using applets, the above is not production server, it is low end production like client machine as clients are expected to have low end systems. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems havi

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

are using an 8 year old low performance netbook cpu. The cpu itself is slow, the memory performance of an atom based system is slow and 2 Gb isn't that much for a win 7 system. So, what do you expect? > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

cted to have low end systems. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM <

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

GHz Ram: 1.99 GB 32-bit operating system Will get you the performance indices. Since we are using applets, the above is not production server, it is low end production like client machine as clients are expected to have low end systems. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versi

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

Processor: Intel® Atom™ CPU 330 @1.60GHz 1.60 GHz Ram: 1.99 GB 32-bit operating system Will get you the performance indices. Since we are using applets, the above is not production server, it is low end production like client machine as clients are expected to have low end systems. > PDFBox 2.

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

file that you sent to Andreas and me, or was it a "production" file? > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lo

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

and 1g option for -Xmx but no gain in performance, results below java –Xmx512m -jar pdfbox-2.0.0-RC2.jar PDFToImage -imageType Jpg "FontTest.PDF" Time taken for Xmx512m: 21.66,19.89,20.11 Time taken for Xmx1g: 20.26,19.77,20.17 Don't know, since there was no performance issue with 4 G

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

machine? What is its Windows 7 performance index? Mine (total) is 5.5. The RAM performance index (which is about speed) is 7.5, the CPU index is 7.3. My lower total index is because I have a low performance on aero graphics (because I have very basic graphics, I'm not a gamer). > PDFBox 2.0.0-

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

years old, celeron 1.99 Ghz CPU, 2GB RAM. PDFToImage took 9 seconds the first time. After starting it repeatably, time went down to 4 seconds. (probably parts of the JRE being cached in memory) > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

have a low performance on aero graphics (because I have very basic graphics, I'm not a gamer). > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

that I still have a laptop that is 10 years old, celeron 1.99 Ghz CPU, 2GB RAM. PDFToImage took 9 seconds the first time. After starting it repeatably, time went down to 4 seconds. (probably parts of the JRE being cached in memory) > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions pr

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

in the W7 performance indices. If the machine is the future production machine, it makes sense for the manufacturer to make it cheap. E.g. the W7 starter edition / 32 bit windows, cheap RAM, simple mainboard, etc. As long as display and printing works properly, it doesn't matter. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

? > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

that I still have a laptop that is 10 years old, celeron 1.99 Ghz CPU, 2GB RAM, 234 fonts, XP. PDFToImage took 9 seconds the first time. After starting it repeatably, time went down to 4 seconds. (probably parts of the JRE being cached in memory) > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPS

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

a difference. The only number given in the previous test results is "90 fonts". Those results seem to show that more RAM results in faster rendering, up to 4GB, which makes perfect sense. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with system

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

and subsequent time it was 18 to 19 secs. Machine has 2GB RAM. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

the PC can be powered off. I already tested low -Xmx values (50m) some days ago (when we exchanged mails) and it worked fine. I just retested with PDFToImage and no resolution parameter and it took about 5 seconds, maybe 6 with low memory. PC is 6 years old. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

ng, up to 4GB, which makes perfect sense. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM <

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

, no applications loaded, nothing else running). > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

slow performance in PDFToImage or print to see the difference. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

with lower RAM and large number of fonts, hence requested Tilman, whose machine has 492+ fonts and 8 GB RAM to reduce RAM to 2 GB and test. Regards Sridhar Sowmiyanarayanan Tata Consultancy Services Mailto: sridhar...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPS

[jira] [Updated] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andreas Lehmkühler updated PDFBOX-3133: --- Attachment: (was: FontTest.pdf) > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPS

[jira] [Updated] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

, whose machine has 492+ fonts and 8 GB RAM to reduce RAM to 2 GB and test. Regards Sridhar Sowmiyanarayanan Tata Consultancy Services Mailto: sridhar...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

as it was automatically attached to this JIRA > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

of RAM and lots of fonts? I'd expect that the number of fonts doesn't make a difference as long as the cache is already up to date. There is one information missing. What kind of pdf do you use for your tests? Can you provide us with a sample? > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPS

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

: -- Thanks. I've removed the sample pdf as it was automatically attached to this JIRA was (Author: lehmi): I've removed the sample pdf as it was automatically attached to this JIRA > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having l

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

of PDFToImage. Might be the font caching rebuilding message, will get you the same. Hope deleting the .cache file and re runing might result in warning message again. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and low

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

. Might be the font caching rebuilding message, will get you the same. Hope deleting the .cache file and re runing might result in warning message again. ) > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and low

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

rebuilding message (which should come only once). > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

for the level of slowness encountered). You should run PDFToImage and see how long it takes to generate a PNG file, that way we eliminate print drivers from the equation. The speed of PDFToImage represents the speed of PDFBox, if you get slower printing performance then it's due to Java. > PDFBox 2.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

of PDFToImage represents the speed of PDFBox, if you get slower printing performance then it's due to Java. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

to generate a PNG file, that way we eliminate print drivers from the equation. The speed of PDFToImage represents the speed of PDFBox, if you get slower printing performance then it's due to Java. If PDFToImage is slow then it's a PDFBox issue which we can fix. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

, that way we eliminate print drivers from the equation. The speed of PDFToImage represents the speed of PDFBox, if you get slower printing performance then it's due to Java. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

Box 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts. > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

that the memory is accepted by the computer). Desperate situations require desperate measures. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Assigned] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Hewson reassigned PDFBOX-3133: --- Assignee: John Hewson > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions pr

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

posted there and let me know if it works for you. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

this issue is a duplicate of that one. Try out the solution posted there and let me know if it works for you. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

the memory to a good number (and close everything else). See also the task manager (taskmgr.exe) whether there are some applications that use your memory and/or your CPU. Another thing to test (I may have mentioned this before) is what happens if you switch printers and/or printer cables. > PDF

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

printout is slow. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lo

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

. CPU consumption is only 2 to 3%. It is memory demand which is causing the delay. Was running only Eclipse . Out of 3 GB 1.6 GB was consumed by other apps and another 1.4 GB is available. Still same issue. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is >

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

paperHeight = 50; } else if { // } paper.setSize(paperWidth * 72.0, paperHeight * 72.0); paper.setImageableArea(0, 0, paper.getWidth(), paper.getHeight()); pageFormat.setPaper(paper); return pageFormat; } > PDFBox 2.

[jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15027327#comment-15027327 ] Tilman Hausherr commented on PDFBOX-3133: - You can edit your comments :-) > PDFBox 2.0.0-

[jira] [Created] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

Sridhar created PDFBOX-3133: --- Summary: PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts. Key: PDFBOX-3133 URL: ht

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PDFBOX-3133) PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number of fonts.

. > PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 and earlier 2.0.0 SNAPSHOT Versions print performance is > poor with systems having low RAM < 3GB and lower number

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 2.0.0 RC2 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox version 2.0.0 RC2. The release is available for download at: http://pdfbox.apache.org/download.cgi The numerous feedback on our first release candidate helps us to fix a lot of issues. We'd like to thank

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, Am 18.11.2015 um 19:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2. +1 Rey Malahay (non-binding vote) +1 Timo Boehme +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 John Hewson +1 Tilman Hausherr Thanks for your help

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2

+1 Awesome. — John > On 18 Nov 2015, at 10:46, Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.0-RC2/ > > The release candidat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2

. Tilman Am 18.11.2015 um 19:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.0-RC2/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, +1 checked the app-jar. My collection of problematic/error PDF now mostly render fine. Thanks, Timo Am 18.11.2015 um 19:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.0-RC2

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Am 19.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Why is [PDFBOX-3107] Asterisk character not displaying properly in Adobe Reader included in the release notes? This is a new, unsolved bug. Hmm, I've used JIRA to compile the list and until now I thought that it contains only resolved/closed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2

+1 - thanks for preparing the RC2. BR Maruan > Am 18.11.2015 um 19:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.0-RC2/ > &g

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Why is [PDFBOX-3107] Asterisk character not displaying properly in Adobe Reader included in the release notes? This is a new, unsolved bug. Tilman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Am 18.11.2015 um 11:44 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Tilman Hausherr hat am 18. November 2015 um 07:50 geschrieben: Am 18.11.2015 um 07:38 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: I'd like to see PDFBOX-3082 to be addressed or at least the patch provided by Tom Callahan to be reviewed.

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.0-RC2/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/2.0.0-RC2/ The SHA1 checksum of the archive

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Am 18.11.2015 um 17:59 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 18.11.2015 um 11:44 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Tilman Hausherr hat am 18. November 2015 um 07:50 geschrieben: Am 18.11.2015 um 07:38 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: I'd like to see PDFBOX-3082 to be addressed or at least the

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> Tilman Hausherr hat am 18. November 2015 um 07:50 > geschrieben: > > > Am 18.11.2015 um 07:38 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > > I'd like to see PDFBOX-3082 to be addressed or at least the patch provided > > by Tom Callahan to be reviewed. > > It has a very high impact on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2

+1 On 18 November 2015 at 11:46, Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de> wrote: > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.0-RC2/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of t

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, > Andreas Lehmkuehler hat am 9. November 2015 um 18:36 > geschrieben: > > > Hi, > > Am 07.11.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > > On 11/06/2015 10:24 PM, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote: > >> I've found work around for my problem (gfx card). It's not perfect, but it

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, > Am 17.11.2015 um 12:54 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > Hi, > >> Andreas Lehmkuehler hat am 9. November 2015 um 18:36 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Am 07.11.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >>> On 11/06/2015 10:24 PM, Andreas

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Am 18.11.2015 um 07:38 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: I'd like to see PDFBOX-3082 to be addressed or at least the patch provided by Tom Callahan to be reviewed. It has a very high impact on memory usage and there were several complaints. I hope to be able to test, review and commit the rest of his

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, Am 07.11.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: On 11/06/2015 10:24 PM, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote: I've found work around for my problem (gfx card). It's not perfect, but it works. The work around doesn't work for my signing environment. :-( We have to postpone the RC Everything

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

On 11/06/2015 10:24 PM, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote: I've found work around for my problem (gfx card). It's not perfect, but it works. The work around doesn't work for my signing environment. :-( We have to postpone the RC BR ANdreas I'll try to find some time tomorrow to cut the RC .

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Am 06.11.2015 um 08:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Am 06.11.2015 um 07:30 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : Hi, Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? I would have some cycles to cut a RC2

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> Tilman Hausherr hat am 6. November 2015 um 09:36 > geschrieben: > > > Am 06.11.2015 um 08:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > >> Am 06.11.2015 um 07:30 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> Am 06.11.2015 um 10:20 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > >> Tilman Hausherr hat am 6. November 2015 um 09:36 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Am 06.11.2015 um 08:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Am 06.11.2015 um 07:30 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Am 06.11.2015 um 18:21 schrieb John Hewson: Hello, I’m online now and will take a look at the build issue. Sorry, I’d assumed that Id fixed it yesterday one my local build passed, but I don’t run Isartor so I missed that one. You probably mean Bavaria, which is disabled by default, but

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Am 06.11.2015 um 19:12 schrieb John Hewson: Ok, I’m done making changes. PDFBOX-2950 is working well enough now. So I’m happy for RC2. test is running... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, I have bad news. After a software update my machine is somehow broken and I couldn't get it to run. I'm afraid we have to postpone the RC2. Sorry, my fault :-(( BR Andreas > John Hewson hat am 6. November 2015 um 19:12 geschrieben: > > > Ok, I’m done making changes.

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Hello, I’m online now and will take a look at the build issue. Sorry, I’d assumed that Id fixed it yesterday one my local build passed, but I don’t run Isartor so I missed that one. — John > On 5 Nov 2015, at 22:30, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote: > > Hi, > > > Am 02.11.2015

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Ok, I’m done making changes. PDFBOX-2950 is working well enough now. So I’m happy for RC2. — John > On 6 Nov 2015, at 09:21, John Hewson wrote: > > Hello, > > I’m online now and will take a look at the build issue. Sorry, I’d assumed > that Id fixed it yesterday one my

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> On 6 Nov 2015, at 09:30, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > > Am 06.11.2015 um 18:21 schrieb John Hewson: >> Hello, >> >> I’m online now and will take a look at the build issue. Sorry, I’d assumed >> that Id fixed it yesterday one my local build passed, but I don’t run >>

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

I've found work around for my problem (gfx card). It's not perfect, but it works. I'll try to find some time tomorrow to cut the RC . BR Andreas On 11/06/2015 07:58 PM, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, I have bad news. After a software update my machine is somehow broken and I couldn't get

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> Am 06.11.2015 um 07:30 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > > Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: >> Hi, >> >> do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? >> >> I would have some cycles to cut a RC2 this week only (on

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, Am 02.11.2015 um 19:27 schrieb John Hewson: On 2 Nov 2015, at 08:32, Maruan Sahyoun wrote: Hi, Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : Hi, do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? I'd think

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> On 4 Nov 2015, at 13:57, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 02.11.2015 um 19:27 schrieb John Hewson: >> >>> On 2 Nov 2015, at 08:32, Maruan Sahyoun wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> Am 02.11.2015 um 18:36 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: >> Hi, >> >> do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? >> >> I would have some cycles to cut a RC2 this week only (on Wednesday?). >>

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> On 2 Nov 2015, at 08:32, Maruan Sahyoun wrote: > > Hi, > >> Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : >> >> Hi, >> >> do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? >> > > I'd think another RC would be good but

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, > Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > Hi, > > do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? > I'd think another RC would be good but that should potentially include an enhanced font cache. BR Maruan > I would have some

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? I would have some cycles to cut a RC2 this week only (on Wednesday?). Yes! Suggestion for announce text (additional to the usual things): - thanks for the

2.0.0-RC2

Hi, do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? I would have some cycles to cut a RC2 this week only (on Wednesday?). WDYT? BR Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org