Re: Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-04-05 Thread Andreas Lehmkühler
Hi Maruan, Maruan Sahyoun hat am 5. April 2013 um 12:16 geschrieben: > Hi Andreas, > > for the new PDFBox site we need a SVN location > (http://www.apache.org/dev/cmsref.html#svn). > As 'site' is already taken would you have a preference? Is 'cmssite' fine? Just for the record: that's not my deci

Re: Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-04-05 Thread Maruan Sahyoun
Hi Andreas, for the new PDFBox site we need a SVN location (http://www.apache.org/dev/cmsref.html#svn). As 'site' is already taken would you have a preference? Is 'cmssite' fine? BR Maruan Sahyoun

Re: Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-03-27 Thread Timo Boehme
Hi, moving to the CMS is IMHO a good idea. To speed up the process of getting consensus here are my +1 for doing the transition. Thanks Maruan for volunteering for this task. Best, Timo Am 27.03.2013 00:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 26.03.2013 23:04, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: would

Re: Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-03-27 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler
Hi, Am 27.03.2013 07:23, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: thx for the offer to help. I think it's needed :-) I'm happy that someone is eager enough to do some of the not so cool things like documentation. ;-) I already read about the Apache CMS and svnpubsub and think that the CMS is > the way to go

Re: Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-03-26 Thread Maruan Sahyoun
thx for the offer to help. I think it's needed :-) I already read about the Apache CMS and svnpubsub and think that the CMS is the way to go although it's initially a little more effort. One of the major benefits of the CMS is that non technical users can use it (the web UI) and it's easier for

Re: Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-03-26 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler
Hi, Am 26.03.2013 23:04, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: would be happy to handle that Cool! I'll try to help whenever possible. OK, I guess we don't need a formal vote on moving our site to the CMS, but let's wait a couple of days so that everybody has a chance to object. @Maruan Once we have lazy c

Re: Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-03-26 Thread Maruan Sahyoun
would be happy to handle that Maruan Sahyoun Am 26.03.2013 um 22:35 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > Hi, > > Am 26.03.2013 17:00, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> well - the navigation is similar also hidden behind drop downs on ode > > compared to cloudstack. Both are using the same css framework [1]

Re: Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-03-26 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler
Hi, Am 26.03.2013 17:00, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: well - the navigation is similar also hidden behind drop downs on ode > compared to cloudstack. Both are using the same css framework [1] and the > navigation can even be combined - that should give us enough freedom (and > is an implementation d

Re: Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-03-26 Thread Maruan Sahyoun
well - the navigation is similar also hidden behind drop downs on ode compared to cloudstack. Both are using the same css framework [1] and the navigation can even be combined - that should give us enough freedom (and is an implementation detail). Both seem to be using the Apache CMS [2]. Maru

Re: Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-03-26 Thread Timo Boehme
Hi, an update to the website with a cleaner grouping of content etc. would help to attract people. While 'ode' and 'cordova' are visually nice I would like to keep more navigation possibilities at the start page like in 'cloudstack'. Best regards, Timo Am 26.03.2013 14:03, schrieb Maruan

Overhaul PDFBox site

2013-03-26 Thread Maruan Sahyoun
Hi there, what do you think about giving the PDFBox website an overhaul similar to http://cloudstack.apache.org/ http://ode.apache.org/index.html http://cordova.apache.org with a more prominent user guide such as http://ode.apache.org/userguide/ and a cleaner architecture description (together