Re: Proposal Pivot goes HTML5

2011-11-15 Thread DreamTangerine
On mar, 2011-11-15 at 11:39 +0100, Sandro Martini wrote: Just after the pluggable AWT backend I see even a pluggable JavaFX 2 backend (if compatible by license) ... could give us another vision on the future (and start playing with it). I also like the idea (in fact, I was working also in

[jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-793) Move Wtk classes related to SVGSalamander in a dedicated wtk-svg (or similar) subproject inside Pivot

2011-10-11 Thread dreamtangerine (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13125415#comment-13125415 ] dreamtangerine commented on PIVOT-793: -- I created a folder in https

[jira] [Updated] (PIVOT-793) Move Wtk classes related to SVGSalamander in a dedicated wtk-svg (or similar) subproject inside Pivot

2011-10-11 Thread dreamtangerine (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dreamtangerine updated PIVOT-793: - Attachment: pivot-wtk-media.patch.zip Apply over org.apache.wtk.media package

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-798) Component#isEnabled does not affect appearance recursively

2011-10-08 Thread DreamTangerine
(). Just a thought. DreamTangerine. On sáb, 2011-10-08 at 10:10 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 01:49, Bill van Melle (Commented) (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: In particular, it is important that setting enabled to true for the container not suddenly enable children

Re: Move Wtk classes related to SVGSalamander in a dedicated wtk-svg (or similar) subproject inside Pivot

2011-10-08 Thread DreamTangerine
, DreamTangerine wrote: I agree with you. I think a ServiceLoader is a good idea. If you need some help maybe I can help you. On jue, 2011-09-08 at 22:32 +0700, Chris Bartlett wrote: I think I have a couple of hours 'free' today. I will try to take a quick look at it, but can't promise anything

[jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-794) Add BlockingDialog to WTK

2011-09-14 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13104506#comment-13104506 ] dreamtangerine commented on PIVOT-794: -- I also changed org.apache.pivot.wtk.Window

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-794) Add BlockingDialog to WTK

2011-09-14 Thread DreamTangerine
Ok, don't worry I understand. I didn't write any test for now. It is only a little prototype for suggestion. On mié, 2011-09-14 at 14:08 +, Sandro Martini (JIRA) wrote: [

Re: Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: Pivot-trunk #5

2011-09-14 Thread DreamTangerine
Great. Well done. On jue, 2011-09-15 at 01:47 +0200, Sandro Martini wrote: Hi all, after many tests finally we have Pivot nightly builds on Apache Jenkins ... our first (positive) build is the 18, and here is the site: https://builds.apache.org/job/Pivot-trunk/ There are still some

Re: Move Wtk classes related to SVGSalamander in a dedicated wtk-svg (or similar) subproject inside Pivot

2011-09-08 Thread DreamTangerine
I agree with you. I think a ServiceLoader is a good idea. If you need some help maybe I can help you. On jue, 2011-09-08 at 22:32 +0700, Chris Bartlett wrote: I think I have a couple of hours 'free' today. I will try to take a quick look at it, but can't promise anything. On 8 September

Re: Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: Pivot-trunk #5

2011-08-26 Thread DreamTangerine
On vie, 2011-08-26 at 15:32 +0200, Sandro Martini wrote: Hi all, sorry for all these email with errors from Jenkins, but for some things the only way is to test directly on the rela server ... now the double checkout problem has gone out. I'm searching on a way to export the current

[jira] [Updated] (PIVOT-791) Use of Jenkins for regular builds testing

2011-08-25 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dreamtangerine updated PIVOT-791: - Attachment: PivotBuild.zip Here is a zip file with a new build.xml and build.properties. The new

Re: 2.0.1 release

2011-08-24 Thread DreamTangerine
On mié, 2011-08-24 at 16:12 +0700, Chris Bartlett wrote: Firstly, many thanks to DreamTangerine for making the initial effort to get us going. :) Not at all. So, is it Ok for all if I make some required changes ? Of course verifying that even standard (not-jenkins) builds will work

Re: 2.0.1 release

2011-08-24 Thread DreamTangerine
by dreamtangerine and all works good (there is only a small problem with the dist task but could be simple to fix it). which is the problem ? I'll try fix it.

Re: 2.0.1 release

2011-08-23 Thread DreamTangerine
Good. If you (Sandro or Chris) have any problem I'll try to help. The key is the build in Apache server from a checkout if you can build Pivot in Apache server, the configuration of Jenkins is easy. Maybe some problems come from libraries dependencies and maybe we have to upload some jar (for

Re: 2.0.1 release

2011-08-19 Thread DreamTangerine
server so you can setup yourself. Here are a link to a FAQ http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson for How do I get an account Bye DreamTangerine.

[jira] [Updated] (PIVOT-791) Use of Jenkins for regular builds testing

2011-08-19 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dreamtangerine updated PIVOT-791: - Attachment: jenkins.config.xml.zip jenkins.configure.html.zip

[jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-791) Use of Jenkins for regular builds testing

2011-08-19 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13088103#comment-13088103 ] dreamtangerine commented on PIVOT-791: -- To test a local Jenkins server with the files

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (PIVOT-791) Use of Jenkins for regular builds testing

2011-08-19 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13088103#comment-13088103 ] dreamtangerine edited comment on PIVOT-791 at 8/20/11 1:30 AM

Re: What about a TextOperator interface?

2011-08-15 Thread DreamTangerine
Ok, I agree with all of you, for now Roger solution may be a solution for current o next minor version and we can discuss the common base class and interfaces for the next version or big version. On dom, 2011-08-14 at 13:21 +0700, Chris Bartlett wrote: On 14 August 2011 04:27, DreamTangerine

Re: What about a TextOperator interface?

2011-08-15 Thread DreamTangerine
On lun, 2011-08-15 at 10:43 -0400, Greg Brown wrote: I think is better to create a common base class TextComponent where TextInput, TextArea and TextPane are children. I think this makes sense for TextInput and TextArea. TextPane would be more challenging since it extends Container.

Progress of Drawing in SWT or WPF or OpenGL

2011-07-22 Thread DreamTangerine
Any progress ? How I can help ? Thanks DreamTangerine.

Re: Progress of Drawing in SWT or WPF or OpenGL

2011-07-22 Thread DreamTangerine
platform, and I think OpenGL is more widespread, so porting to OpenGl is a plus. On vie, 2011-07-22 at 12:36 -0400, Greg Brown wrote: I don't understand the question. Can you provide a little more context? On Jul 22, 2011, at 12:11 PM, DreamTangerine wrote: Any progress ? How I can help

Re: Progress of Drawing in SWT or WPF or OpenGL

2011-07-22 Thread DreamTangerine
On vie, 2011-07-22 at 13:36 -0400, Greg Brown wrote: OK, I will think and play with this http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/agile2d/ and think how to integrated with pivot. After reading this http://apache-pivot-developers.417237.n3.nabble.com/Drawing-in-SWT-or-WPF-td2169321.html#a2172900 I

[jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-761) Test a more generic Validation approach on fields and Containers (Forms, etc)

2011-07-15 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13066030#comment-13066030 ] dreamtangerine commented on PIVOT-761: -- I create a little prototype (a proof

[jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-761) Test a more generic Validation approach on fields and Containers (Forms, etc)

2011-07-01 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058600#comment-13058600 ] dreamtangerine commented on PIVOT-761: -- Is there a method on Component class to get

[jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-761) Test a more generic Validation approach on fields and Containers (Forms, etc)

2011-07-01 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058618#comment-13058618 ] dreamtangerine commented on PIVOT-761: -- It maybe useful for Component class, to add

[jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-761) Test a more generic Validation approach on fields and Containers (Forms, etc)

2011-06-27 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13055691#comment-13055691 ] dreamtangerine commented on PIVOT-761: -- Perhaps, but then the user could bypass

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-761) Test a more generic Validation approach on fields and Containers (Forms, etc)

2011-06-27 Thread DreamTangerine
Perhaps, but then the user could bypass the validation by invoking the setter directly. Yes is true, but It is the same that property binding. If you call a setter directly nobody is notified of the change. Not sure what type of property binding you are referring to, but all Pivot

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-761) Test a more generic Validation approach on fields and Containers (Forms, etc)

2011-06-27 Thread DreamTangerine
On lun, 2011-06-27 at 15:28 -0400, Greg Brown wrote: Perhaps, but then the user could bypass the validation by invoking the setter directly. Yes is true, but It is the same that property binding. If you call a setter directly nobody is notified of the change. Not sure what type of

[jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-761) Test a more generic Validation approach on fields and Containers (Forms, etc)

2011-06-25 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054934#comment-13054934 ] dreamtangerine commented on PIVOT-761: -- Well, I agree that validation belongs to other

[jira] [Commented] (PIVOT-761) Test a more generic Validation approach on fields and Containers (Forms, etc)

2011-06-24 Thread dreamtangerine (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13054535#comment-13054535 ] dreamtangerine commented on PIVOT-761: -- Hi all. I want to collaborate in this issue