Re: [DISCUSS] How to handle Docker?

HI, > Second thing is: > Do we want to distribute Docker images of things that need it? And if yes, > how do we do it correctly (Justin … this part of the question is generally > directed to you ;) ) Best guidelines we currently have is [1] Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: Changing the format for floating point in mspec?

Hi everyone, If you wanted to do MSPEC such that you could or could have generated the currently supported protocols with it, you may need to do more than this. I have been mentioning anecdotally on slack about modbus float permutations in the wild, and took a moment to find someplace with that

[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [596]'

BUILD-STABLE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [596]': Is back to normal.

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [595]'

BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [595]': Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/595/;>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [595]"

RE: [DRAFT] December 2019 board report

+1, Excellent work guys, Best regards, Enviado desde Correo para Windows 10 De: Christofer Dutz Enviado: miércoles, 11 de diciembre de 2019 04:38 Para: dev@plc4x.apache.org Asunto: [DRAFT] December 2019 board report Hi all, I just whipped up our quarterly board report and would submit it

Re: [DISCUSS] How to handle Docker?

Haha, yeah, we are the no-profile-wing :D Am 11.12.19, 11:54 schrieb "Strljic, Matthias Milan" : Hahaha xD i think for that we need soon an organigram :D Matthias Strljic, M.Sc. Universität Stuttgart Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und

AW: [DISCUSS] How to handle Docker?

Hahaha xD i think for that we need soon an organigram :D Matthias Strljic, M.Sc. Universität Stuttgart Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW) Seidenstraße 36 70174 Stuttgart GERMANY Tel: +49 711 685-84530 Fax: +49 711 685-74530 E-Mail: 

Re: [DISCUSS] How to handle Docker?

Ok ... so as the biggest "less-profiles"-party members agreed on this, I'll pursue this path ... now it's on file guys :-P Chris Am 11.12.19, 10:56 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, fully agree with Matthias here (<3). Optional is way better as I usually also do not have my

Re: [DRAFT] December 2019 board report

Hi Julian, well it WAS depressing :-( ... but I did also write: However in the past 2-3 weeks a lot of new people have joined discussions and submitted PRs and the existing committer- and PMC activity has picked up again. The board isn't going to take any action, but I thought it would be good

Re: Changing the format for floating point in mspec?

Hi Julian, I know ... I haven't encountered a "ufloat" yet, but thought ... if we do it, we do it right ;) Chris Am 11.12.19, 10:57 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Although I have to state that this ufloat thing is overall weird-ish. But overall, I think the way you implemented it is

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/features%2Fscraper-jmx-support [features/scraper-jmx-support] [20]'

BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/features%2Fscraper-jmx-support [features/scraper-jmx-support] [20]': Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/features%252Fscraper-jmx-support/20/;>PLC4X/PLC4X/features%2Fscraper-jmx-support [features/scraper-jmx-support] [20]"

Re: Changing the format for floating point in mspec?

Although I have to state that this ufloat thing is overall weird-ish. But overall, I think the way you implemented it is the best. Julian Am 10.12.19, 21:55 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Hi Lukas, Yeah ... the more I thought about it, the more I liked it and since today that

Re: [DISCUSS] How to handle Docker?

Hi, fully agree with Matthias here (<3). Optional is way better as I usually also do not have my docker host running as it drains too much energy __ Julian Am 11.12.19, 10:38 schrieb "Strljic, Matthias Milan" : Hi Chris, for build compatibility I would go with option 2. Even if

Re: [DRAFT] December 2019 board report

Hi, I think ist fine. It reads a bit more depressing then it should (if you see current list activity which is awesome and PRs from foreigners and stuff) but its fine : ) Julian Am 11.12.19, 10:22 schrieb "Strljic, Matthias Milan" : +1 Fine for me  Matthias Strljic,

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [594]'

BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [594]': Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/594/;>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [594]"

AW: [DISCUSS] How to handle Docker?

Hi Chris, for build compatibility I would go with option 2. Even if I am from the anti-profil-option party. With option 1 the PLC4X complete build would be failing because of a missing docker dependency. Greetings to all Windows users which do not want to use the Hyper-V especially with

AW: [DRAFT] December 2019 board report

+1 Fine for me  Matthias Strljic, M.Sc. Universität Stuttgart Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW) Seidenstraße 36 70174 Stuttgart GERMANY Tel: +49 711 685-84530 Fax: +49 711 685-74530 E-Mail: matthias.strl...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de Web: 

[DISCUSS] How to handle Docker?

Hi all, yesterday I had a look at what’s missing in order for us to ship fully functional StreamPipe modules. Adding the missing spring-boot repackaging was simple. I also added Dockerfiles for both modules that successfully build docker images and should theoretically also deploy them to

[DRAFT] December 2019 board report

Hi all, I just whipped up our quarterly board report and would submit it this evening as today is the submission deadline. If you have anything to add … please report this as soon as possible. Chris. ## Description: The mission of the Apache PLC4X project is creating a set of libraries for