I'm sorry. I have provided the wrong description of the changes from the PR.
The PR has changed the server side, so it's hard for users to ask to
upgrade
the Flink connector if the pulsar server is upgraded.
I support reverting the PR first and then looking for a long-term solution.
Best,
Hi Enrico,
Thank you for your feedback. While I understand that
"delete-all-namespaces" is more explicit,
I also think it's a bit lengthy for a command-line parameter.
I personally believe the "wipe" option, combined with a safety confirmation
step,
would be more user-friendly and efficient.
By
Hi, Asaf
This is a great suggestion. I believe one significant advantage is that
it can help newcomers better understand the voting process and how
decisions are made.
The checklist can serve as a reference framework,
assisting new members in becoming familiar with the project's voting
> Did we consider
making a call to upload a Bytes schema a no-op?
It was a BUG that the PR fixed.
You will not be able to get the uploaded schema as expected.
Please take a look at the details from the GitHub issue.
What is the challenge for the Flink connector now?
The changes only take effect
I think this feature is very helpful on heavy traffic topic which have
continuous stable load on each partition.
Is there a way we can set some kind of namespace policy to set the plugin
PartitionAssigner. Hope this can be set on namespace level,
if this can be achieved, it is more adoptable
Il Dom 16 Apr 2023, 15:45 Asaf Mesika ha scritto:
> How about "truncate" instead of "clear"?
>
Truncate is better, or maybe 'wipe' (because truncate means another
operation for topics currently)
Another alternative, more explicit:
pulsar-admin tenants delete-all-namespaces TENANT
Enrico
>
>
Asaf,
I understand your intent.
I think that when anyone casts a +1, especially with '(binding)' they know
well what they are doing.
It is not an 'I like it', but it is an important assumption of
responsibility.
This applies to all the VOTEs.
Requiring this checklist may be good in order to help
Would love additional feedback on this suggestion.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 4:19 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> It looks like we can try to add a new section to
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/wiki/proposals/PIP.md
> like "Review the proposal" and it is not only for PMCs, all the
How about "truncate" instead of "clear"?
Just wondering - since it is such a dangerous command, how can we help the
user not make an accidental mass deletion?
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 1:12 PM Girish Sharma
wrote:
> > However, the current goal is to keep the tenant and namespace intact
> while
>
