RE: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar Client C++ 3.4.0 released

Hi, We have a requirement where the message has been consumed from one topic, processed it and written to another topic in single transaction. Looks like transaction support related client APIs in C++ is still not available and that is in roadmap of pulsar delivery. Please let us know the

[DISCUSS] Release Pulsar Python clieng 3.4.0

Hi all, I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar Python client 3.4.0. It's over three months since the release of 3.3.0, and there are 46 new commits: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-python/compare/v3.0.0...main The Pulsar C++ client 3.4.1 has been released. I have upgraded the C++

RE: Re: Re: [Discuss] PIP-319 Unblock stuck Key_Shared subscription after consumer reconnect

Hi Rajan, Thanks for sharing the link! I will follow the PR. Best Regards, Nikolai On 2023/12/02 01:21:04 Rajan Dhabalia wrote: > Hi Nikolai, > > I completely understand your concern and pain. But let's understand > ordering semantics for exclusive/fail-over subscription. This

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-321 Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters

>if users want to change the replication policy for topic-n and do not change the replication policy of other topics, they need to change all the topic policy under this namespace. This PIP unfortunately flows from attempting to solve bad application design A namespace is supposed to represent

Re: Pulsar 3.0.2 docker image only supports arm64 platform

We need to use the following commands to push the images: ```sh regctl image copy 9947090/pulsar:3.0.2-12c92fe apachepulsar/pulsar:3.0.2 regctl image copy 9947090/pulsar-all:3.0.2-12c92fe apachepulsar/pulsar-all:3.0.2 ``` It's missing in the release doc. I will update it later. Thanks, Zike Yang

Re: Pulsar 3.0.2 docker image only supports arm64 platform

I found Matteo has updated 3.1.1 as the latest image: https://hub.docker.com/layers/apachepulsar/pulsar/latest/images/sha256-21e8bf1571e4ab559a51b3f6e524d725cffabe3c6836101f9d7ea7eb1e2bf62c?context=explore But the 3.0.2 still lacks the image for the amd64 platform. Thanks, Yunze On Mon, Dec 4,

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-321 Split the responsibilities of namespace replication-clusters

Hi Rajan and Girish, Thanks for your reply. About the question you mentioned, there is some information I want to share with you. >If anyone wants to setup different replication clusters then either >those topics can be created under different namespaces or defined at topic >level policy. >And

Pulsar 3.0.2 docker image only supports arm64 platform

Hi all, When I ran unit tests for the pulsar-client-cpp repo, which uses `apachepulsar/pulsar:latest` image to start a standalone, I found the tests failed and the following error [1]: ``` standalone The requested image's platform (linux/arm64) does not match the detected host platform