May I make a proposal : adding `remote` flag also?
#Concern : It seems like we are sort of allowing users to assume what the
ones without `local` flag are (are called by the community).
#Possible Benfit : Users will benefit from not having to think about what `
non-local` clusters are called.
Thanks. addressed in the PIP
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 6:05 PM PengHui Li wrote:
> Hi Jiwei,
>
> Do you need to change the REST API? or will it just apply to the Admin CLI?
> If it requires REST API changes, you should also reflect them in the
> proposal.
>
> And yes,
Hi Jiwei,
Do you need to change the REST API? or will it just apply to the Admin CLI?
If it requires REST API changes, you should also reflect them in the
proposal.
And yes, using the local and remote will be confusing because users can have
multiple clusters without geo-replication. Maybe we
+1, this is a good improvement.
In the proposal, I don't suggest you append the `local` to the cluster name:
1. It will be confusing when the original cluster name includes the `local` name
2. In some cases, it is not easy to distinguish between local and
remote clusters
so I suggest we should
May I make a proposal : adding `remote` flag also?
#Concern : It seems like we are sort of allowing users to assume what the
ones without `local` flag are (are called by the community).
#Possible Benfit : Users will benefit from not having to think about what `
non-local` clusters are called.
