Update regarding Codecov improvements for apache/pulsar CI:
- fixed issue with Jacoco coverage data not getting stored in files:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19947
This seemed to be a broader issues since the reported total code coverage
increased to about 72.8% with this fix, example
Thanks for sharing the pain. That's the first step in improving something that
is painful.
For the flaky tests GitHub Actions workflow pulsar-ci-flaky.yaml, the Codecov
upload should be a separate job in the workflow so that the upload could be
retried separately without running all tests. This
The codecov is really annoying to me and never helps me during the
coding or reviewing process.
Just a complaint from me. I'm also curious how many developers benefit from it.
Thanks,
Yunze
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 6:50 PM tison wrote:
>
> For example
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/actions/r
For example
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/actions/runs/4454158774/jobs/7867745340?pr=19842
I'm wondering if anyone cares about the report and if it helps you during
the coding or reviewing process? Now it generates a few of noise but I just
omit the report it gives ;-)
For the issue itself, it
