[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796497#action_12796497
]
Carl Trieloff commented on QPID-2320:
-
Here is a diff which I think resolves it, take a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Huston reassigned QPID-2313:
--
Assignee: Andrew Stitcher
Andrew, please include this WCF release note change for 0.6.
> Releas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross resolved QPID-2318.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.7
> qpid-tool does not seem to issue session acknowledgements
> -
On 01/04/2010 02:43 PM, Robert Godfrey wrote:
2010/1/4 john dunning
I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml
exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite
(cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match.
The difficulty I have right now is th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796370#action_12796370
]
Andrew Stitcher commented on QPID-2320:
---
Soliciting opinion:
This seems like it might
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ken Giusti updated QPID-2248:
-
Attachment: qmf-ng-api-01042010.txt
Checkpoint - add tagging to QmfData attributes.
> QMF: proposed API f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ken Giusti updated QPID-2261:
-
Attachment: qmfv2-01-04-10.patch
Checkpoint - added tagging (subtypes) to data values
> QMF V2 API implem
I've upped the version of trunk qpid to 0.7 (in all the places I could
find). So the trunk is now open for development.
The Branch created to release 0.6 is called "0.6-release" it is based on
svn revision 895736.
Please don't check anything in there without checking it out with me
first. At this
For your new year resolution:
http://qpid.apache.org/dist/qpid-0.6rc3/
In theory the only part of the code that could have regressed since the
previous release candidates is the java code as that is all the code
that has changed since then.
However as I don't plan to make any changes until the r
On 01/04/2010 02:55 PM, Gordon Sim (JIRA) wrote:
Failed acquire on LVQ causes broker crash
-
Key: QPID-2320
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2320
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796361#action_12796361
]
Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-2317:
---
Gordon: agree - though I think this leads into a wide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796358#action_12796358
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-2317:
--
I'd suggest that perhaps having a more abstract definit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2319:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
> qpid-route hangs when connecting to the Java Broker
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Stitcher updated QPID-2316:
--
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.6)
0.7
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796334#action_12796334
]
Andrew Stitcher commented on QPID-2316:
---
Worked around this bug for the 0.6 release by
Failed acquire on LVQ causes broker crash
-
Key: QPID-2320
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2320
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: C++ Broker
Affects Versions: 0.6
Yep, supported Exchange types is something I exposed via the JMX interface
for the Java broker not so long ago, and is something I'd want available as
and when QMF support is added to it. As such adding it to the C++ broker
seems sensible, and more so considering it actually has custom exchange
typ
2010/1/4 john dunning
> I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml
> exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite
> (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match.
>
> The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is optional. If
> y
All,
as per my earlier e-mail I would like to try to collate in a single place
all the extensions we have made using arguments/options to commands in AMQP.
Ive made a start on the following wiki page:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Qpid+extensions+to+AMQP
Since I'm primarily co
Hi John,
> I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure
> xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to
> the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match.
>
> The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is
> optional. If you didn't
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:54 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> Happy new year.
>
> Thanks to all who've tested RC2 over the past couple of weeks:
>
> There have been some issues that mean I will be issuing an RC3 today (I
> hope)
>
> 1. QPID-2308 / QPID-2096: These are Java store issues
> - Robbie/
I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml
exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite
(cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match.
The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is optional. If
you didn't configure for xml and loa
qpid-route hangs when connecting to the Java Broker
---
Key: QPID-2319
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2319
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: python tools
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2318:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
> qpid-tool does not seem to issue session acknowledgements
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Godfrey updated QPID-2318:
--
Description:
Running with qpid-tool against either the Java (after the QMF patch) or the C++
Broker it
qpid-tool does not seem to issue session acknowledgements
--
Key: QPID-2318
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2318
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: pyt
Done.
> 1. QPID-2308 / QPID-2096: These are Java store issues
> - Robbie/Martin: Please checkin your fixes
>
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796273#action_12796273
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2308:
--
Commited to trunk
> durable exchange bindings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-2096:
-
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
> ExchangeRegistration shoud NOT automatically add dur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796272#action_12796272
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2096:
--
Commited to trunk
> ExchangeRegistration shoud
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated QPID-2308:
-
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
> durable exchange bindings are not recovered from the
> 3. QPID-2260: There was a final trivial packaging fix here
> that missed the previous respin.
> - Steve feel free to apply the final patch here.
Done.
-Steve
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http:/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Huston resolved QPID-2260.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.7)
0.6
Debug/Release fixed fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Stitcher updated QPID-2096:
--
Assignee: Robbie Gemmell (was: Andrew Stitcher)
Robbie - please checkin your patch to trunk
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Stitcher reassigned QPID-2308:
-
Assignee: Robbie Gemmell (was: Andrew Stitcher)
Robbie, Please checkin your patch
> dura
Hi Rajika
Ok , I am seeing them. Thanks
Harsha
Happy new year.
Thanks to all who've tested RC2 over the past couple of weeks:
There have been some issues that mean I will be issuing an RC3 today (I
hope)
1. QPID-2308 / QPID-2096: These are Java store issues
- Robbie/Martin: Please checkin your fixes
2. QPID-2316: This was an issue with buil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796234#action_12796234
]
Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-2317:
---
Am I right in thinking this patch would add the metho
As alluded to in my earlier mail, I spent a bit of time over the last couple
of weeks implementing federation in the Java Broker...
Trying to derive how it worked through playing with the C++ broker I did the
following
Set up three brokers A, B and C
Created an exchange on each of them called "m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross updated QPID-2317:
---
Attachment: QPID-2317.patch
This patch contains the proposed model update.
> QMF - Add broker methods to mir
QMF - Add broker methods to mirror AMQP management commands
---
Key: QPID-2317
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2317
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: New Feature
Compo
Happy New Year all...
So, at the start of this new year I think it is important that we try to
focus on improving the experience of our project... and in particular I
think we should be looking at making the project look like a single coherent
whole.
Currently the Java and C++ Brokers look and be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796227#action_12796227
]
Ted Ross commented on QPID-2316:
The reason this fails is that the 0.6rc2 release was built
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2316:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
> 0.6RC2 C++ Build fails if ruby-dev and swig installed
> ---
Just in case this part of the question is still unanswered:
On 12/22/2009 07:59 PM, Sam Joyce wrote:
1) during the bind() call, a bindingKey is passed in, is this key of any
value at all? i.e. is there always a 1:1 affinity between a bindingKey
and a successful binding. Can I use this key for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Armin Noll updated QPID-2304:
-
Description:
We start the C++ broker with the following configuration:
log-enable=info+
log-to-file=/var/l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Armin Noll updated QPID-2304:
-
Description:
We start the C++ broker with the following configuration:
log-enable=info+
log-to-file=/var/l
47 matches
Mail list logo
