Re: cluster_read_credit

2010-05-03 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi Alan! On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:33:34AM -0400, Alan Conway wrote: On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 07:56:02PM +0200, Ján Sáreník wrote: There are only Valgrind errors that I see and Gordon says they are merely SASL-related. Should I send a bug-report to cyrus-sasl to make it clean or should those

qpid-r939184-jasan make check

2010-04-29 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi there! There are only Valgrind errors that I see and Gordon says they are merely SASL-related. Should I send a bug-report to cyrus-sasl to make it clean or should those error be added as exceptions? I would like to spread the word about qpid and to encourage people from community to compile

cluster_read_credit (was: qpid-r939184-jasan make check)

2010-04-29 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi again! On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 07:56:02PM +0200, Ján Sáreník wrote: There are only Valgrind errors that I see and Gordon says they are merely SASL-related. Should I send a bug-report to cyrus-sasl to make it clean or should those error be added as exceptions? I would like to spread

Re: acl_test failing on Linux - anyoen seeing this in the automake build?

2010-04-27 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi Steve! On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:14:44AM -0400, Steve Huston wrote: The acl_test has been failing on Linux in the cmake build for a couple of days now... Anyone seeing this on the autoconf build? No. I just run 'make check' which includes acl_test on today's revision 938298 and it worked

Re: acl_test failing on Linux - anyoen seeing this in the automake build?

2010-04-27 Thread Ján Sáreník
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:56:06PM +0200, Ján Sáreník wrote: No. I just run 'make check' which includes acl_test on today's revision 938298 and it worked well. And I compile it with autotools. But after reading Rajith's message - yes, I am on Fedora Rawhide :-) -- Red Hat Czech, MRG Quality

check-long failures on Rawhide

2010-04-15 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hello! On Fedora Rawhide, qpid r934287. I simply did: cd qpid patch -Np1 qpid-r934287.patch # see attachment cd cpp ./bootstrap ./configure --disable-static --with-cpg \ CXXFLAGS=$CXXFLAGS -DNDEBUG -O3 make -j5 make check make check-long I did :%s/2010-..-.. ..:..:.. //

Trunk build error (GNU Autotools)

2010-04-14 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi! Using GNU Autotools to build qpidd trunk worked yesterday with the LDFLAGS I posted. But today, on r933849 I am getting this: ... Making all in tests make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/virtual/jasan/pub/git/qpid/cpp/src/tests' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I../../include

Qpid on Rawhide (solved)

2010-04-13 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hello! Current trunk (r933439) compiles and checks cleanly when I add LDFLAGS=-lboost_system -lpthread to make and make check. Best regards, Ján -- Red Hat Czech, MRG Quality Assurance Associate - Apache Qpid - AMQP

Re: [Help]Qpid in clustering mode

2010-04-13 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hello! On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 06:46:50PM +0530, sonal ojha wrote: Am very new to Qpid , I wanted to know how could I setup Qpid C++ broker in clustering mode. It said to use corosync but then still couldn't find what all setups are involved. I do not know what distribution you are using,

Rawhide compatibility patch

2010-03-29 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hello! This little patch is vital to make current trunk (r928701) compile on Fedora Rawhide with Boost 1.41.0. As far as I recall, I was compiling with this patch cleanly on previous versions as well but I will verify the compilation on RHEL5 with this patch applied soon. The other line adds

Re: Rawhide compatibility patch

2010-03-29 Thread Ján Sáreník
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:30:29PM +0200, Ján Sáreník wrote: This little patch is vital to make current trunk (r928701) compile on Fedora Rawhide with Boost 1.41.0. As far as I recall, I was compiling with this patch cleanly on previous versions as well but I will verify the compilation

Re: Draft 0.6 Announcement

2010-03-24 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi Andrew, On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:29:10AM -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: I'd like any comments on the announcement below and a suggestion of where to send it. I do not like the C ++-like wrapping of C++. Otherwise it is comprehensive and reasonably short. Best regards, Ján -- Red Hat

Store module bugreporting summary

2010-03-16 Thread Ján Sáreník
be logged-in already.) Wishing you all an outstanding day! Best regards, Ján Sáreník -- Red Hat Czech, MRG Quality Assurance Associate - Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact

Re: Little patch to make both python tests work (was: one of)

2010-03-16 Thread Ján Sáreník
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 01:19:52PM +0100, Ján Sáreník wrote: But this is a patch for store. Should I create a JIRA for fix in RHM store module? Probably I am writing to wrong list, but rhemrg-users-l...@redhat.com seems to be pretty unresponsive. See my today's post with Message-ID

Re: Little patch to make both python tests work (was: one of)

2010-03-15 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi Rajith! On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:41:47AM -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote: Could you please create a JIRA and attach the patch there. (Pls make sure to tick the check box granting the license.) But this is a patch for store. Should I create a JIRA for fix in RHM store module? Probably I am

Little patch to make (one of) python tests work

2010-03-12 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi! Here is a little patch which makes one of the python tests work with latest trunk qpid tree. I did not manage to find the other error because I am in a hurry. The patch applies cleanly to store r3868. Have a nice weekend! -- Red Hat Czech, MRG Quality Assurance Associate diff --git

Re: Final 0.6 release candidate and vote

2010-03-11 Thread Ján Sáreník
Ahoj! On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 01:56:16PM -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote: I've put up qpid-0.6rc7 for testing, you'll find it in the usual place: http://qpid.apache.org/dist/qpid-0.6rc7/ Is it noted somewhere, which revision of store should be used with this release of qpid? If it's not,

Re: Final 0.6 release candidate and vote

2010-03-11 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi again! On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:08:29AM +0100, Ján Sáreník wrote: I do not think I have voting right (yet), but I am watching the evolution of qpid-0.6 since the first candidates and I am very thankful for such a team of developers who do things precisely. Ehm, excuse me, I really did

Re: Final 0.6 release candidate and vote

2010-03-11 Thread Ján Sáreník
And the attachment... + cd /home/jsarenik/qpid-0.6rc7 + cd cpp + ./bootstrap + CXXFLAGS=' -DNDEBUG -O3' + ./configure --disable-static --with-cpg --without-help2man [... SNIP ...] + make -j 5 [... SNIP ...] + make check [... SNIP ...] 0% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%

Re: Final 0.6 release candidate and vote

2010-03-11 Thread Ján Sáreník
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:54:29AM +0100, Ján Sáreník wrote: 2. The error on cluster tests - I did not investigate much, but what I know is that the environment I am compiling in is able to cleanly compile, check and install current trunk (including the cluster module). And if I

Re: Final 0.6 release candidate and vote

2010-03-11 Thread Ján Sáreník
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:54:29AM +0100, Ján Sáreník wrote: 1. Released tarball should contain developer-generated configure script and not require the user to have all the autotools stuff. This is contained in qpid-cpp-0.6rc7.tar.gz though. Ján

xml build error

2010-03-08 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hello, during my regular automated morning build I found the error in attachment. This is the first time I was compiling with xqilla-devel package installed. Versions used: Fedora 12 x86_64 with all updates and testing-updates xqilla-devel-2.1.3-0.6.fc11.x86_64 qpid/trunk/q...@920189

Compilation error: r915673 on F12

2010-02-24 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hello! See the attachment. Best regards, Ján -- Red Hat Czech, MRG Quality Assurance Associate Making all in managementgen make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jsarenik/pub/git/qpid/cpp/managementgen' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[1]: Leaving directory

Re: Compilation error: r915673 on F12

2010-02-24 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hello! On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:34:05AM +0100, Ján Sáreník wrote: See the attachment. Forget it please. It was caused by a locally modified nspr.h on my system. Everything works now and no git bisect needed. My apologize, Ján -- Red Hat Czech, MRG Quality Assurance Associate

SWIG Bindings Test Failure

2010-01-06 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hello! On current trunk (r896256) I am getting this error after compiling --with-swig (see attachment) and running 'make check'. Best regards, Jan Sarenik make[3]: Entering directory `/home/jsarenik/qpid/qpid/cpp/bindings/qmf/tests' Running qmf interop tests using broker on port 40430

Re: SWIG Bindings Test Failure

2010-01-06 Thread Ján Sáreník
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:19:57AM -0500, Ted Ross wrote: The problem is that you've built without the cyrus-sasl-devel. The client in that test tries to set the user-id header with information extracted from the sasl context (which isn't there). This test should be disabled in the

Re: Store tests

2009-11-11 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hello! On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 02:45:25AM +, James Birdsall wrote: + clicking on the Qpid Testing link gets me a login page, then after I log in I get You cannot view this page, Page level restrictions have been applied that limit access to this page. snip I am experiencing all the same.

Re: Cdash scoreboard available for qpid dev use

2009-07-02 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi Steve! On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:43:34AM -0400, Steve Huston wrote: I've attached my trunk_nightly.cmake - it sets up the build parameters you want to use, primes the cmake cache with settings you like, etc. Excuse me, but there seems to be no attachment to your e-mail. Best regards

make distcheck

2009-07-01 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi there! Just an update, since two patches - one by aconway (789726), the other (and equally important) by tross (789773) - I can already make distcheck when bootstrapping using last autotools on non-RHEL Linux distribution. Thanks for fixing that! Not wanting to raise following much, but I

Re: License question

2009-06-30 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi Ted! On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:52:32PM -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 17:30 -0400, Ted Ross wrote: I would like to add a new m4 macro definition (AC_PROG_SWIG) to the CPP build directory but it has the following license text. I understand that GPLv2 is not

Re: QPID Testing problems report.

2009-06-18 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi Alan! On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:21:43AM -0400, Alan Conway wrote: This should be fixed as of r785601 Maybe is, but I see another error much earlier in the build process now... r785940 Jasan -- Red Hat Czech, MRG Quality Assurance Associate libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.

Re: Qpid Components Web Site

2009-06-17 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi Jonathan! On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:25:10PM -0400, Jonathan Robie wrote: *...@qpid.apache.org* or *us...@qpid.apache.org* mailing listis. ^^ http://qpid.et.redhat.com/download.html I have checked and it really reads listis

Re: QPID Testing problems report.

2009-06-16 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi there! On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:59:29PM -0400, Ted Ross wrote: Thanks for sending this error report. Can you include the information from the test that failed? That information isn't in the body of your email. Please note that the Apache list servers strip attachments off of email

Re: Trying to build the broker on F10

2009-04-08 Thread Ján Sáreník
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:52:12AM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: Ján Sáreník wrote: even the releases (M4) require you to run bootstrap which is really bad example of GNU autotools usage. I don't believe that is the case. The cpp M4 tarball[1] only requires ./configure. Sorry, I was checking

Re: Build failure for C++ tests with VC2008 and Boost 1.38

2009-03-17 Thread Ján Sáreník
. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:28:31AM +0100, Ján Sáreník wrote: Yes, IMHO it is a boost change. I am including a patch that helps me to make it compile and run. The change is already upstream in trunk, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1741 for more info. Best regards, Jasan -- Red Hat

Re: Build failure for C++ tests with VC2008 and Boost 1.38

2009-03-16 Thread Ján Sáreník
Hi James! On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 03:00:12PM +, James Mansion wrote: I don't have older boost versions installed - is this a boost change? Yes, IMHO it is a boost change. I am including a patch that helps me to make it compile and run. Best regards, Jasan -- Red Hat Czech, MRG Quality

Re: Solaris Port. Project dependencies

2009-02-25 Thread Ján Sáreník
Manuel Teira Paz mte...@tid.es wrote: At least on Ubuntu, the dev packages for nss3 and nspr4 provide a nss-config and nspr-config executables, returning: mte...@colossus:~$ nspr-config --cflags -I/usr/include/nspr mte...@colossus:~$ nss-config --cflags -I/usr/include/nss Does your