Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/10
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mbroadst commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/10#discussion_r68772313
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -108,6 +109,19 @@ void OutgoingFromQueue::write(const char* data, size_t
size)
Github user grs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/10#discussion_r68769620
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -108,6 +109,19 @@ void OutgoingFromQueue::write(const char* data, size_t
size)
GitHub user mbroadst opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/10
feat(disposition): respect messageAnnotation mods in modified state
The modified outcome supports an optional messageAnnotations parameter,
allowing the user to modify these annotations for
Github user mbroadst closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user grs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/commit/7b8a91375dc0528e2c15686ab71c3647ac3e2f96#commitcomment-18005323
In qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Queue.h:
In qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Queue.h on line 538:
should be fixed now
---
If your project
Github user mbroadst commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/commit/7b8a91375dc0528e2c15686ab71c3647ac3e2f96#commitcomment-18004761
In qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Queue.h:
In qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Queue.h on line 538:
sorry I know it's not your commit,
Github user mbroadst commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/commit/7b8a91375dc0528e2c15686ab71c3647ac3e2f96#commitcomment-18004752
In qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Queue.h:
In qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Queue.h on line 538:
@grs this line prevents builds as it
Github user grs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9#discussion_r68367813
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ OutgoingFromQueue::OutgoingFromQueue(Broker& broker,
const std::string& source,
Github user mbroadst commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9#discussion_r68328482
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ OutgoingFromQueue::OutgoingFromQueue(Broker& broker,
const std::string& source,
Github user mbroadst commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9#discussion_r68322985
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ OutgoingFromQueue::OutgoingFromQueue(Broker& broker,
const std::string& source,
Github user grs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9#discussion_r68322398
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ OutgoingFromQueue::OutgoingFromQueue(Broker& broker,
const std::string& source,
Github user grs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9#discussion_r68322267
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -142,11 +145,10 @@ void OutgoingFromQueue::handle(pn_delivery_t*
delivery)
if
Github user mbroadst commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9#discussion_r68313162
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -142,11 +145,10 @@ void OutgoingFromQueue::handle(pn_delivery_t*
delivery)
if
Github user mbroadst commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9#discussion_r68312642
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ OutgoingFromQueue::OutgoingFromQueue(Broker& broker,
const std::string& source,
Github user grs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9#discussion_r68299958
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -142,11 +145,10 @@ void OutgoingFromQueue::handle(pn_delivery_t*
delivery)
if
Github user grs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9#discussion_r68299289
--- Diff: qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp/Outgoing.cpp ---
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ OutgoingFromQueue::OutgoingFromQueue(Broker& broker,
const std::string& source,
GitHub user mbroadst opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/9
feat(disposition): support undeliverable-here in modified outcomes
Previously, specifying `undeliverable-here` as `true` in a modified
outcome simply resulted in the message being rejected. This
Github user sideshowcoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/7#issuecomment-170585150
I just found this and also
http://web.archive.org/web/20100501115556/http://le-depotoir.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/misc/clock_gettime_stub.c
which tries to provided a
Github user astitcher commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/7#issuecomment-170631466
As a way to implement clock_gettime() this seems like a good approach.
However the bigger problem is the timekeeping between clock_gettime() and
condition vars
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/8
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled
GitHub user gaborsulyok opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/8
NO-JIRA: Fixed .NET Native-Managed string convervsion
The string conversion was not correct when you wanted to convert from
native UTF-8 string to a managed one. A conversion method has ben
Github user astitcher commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/7#issuecomment-101935319
This implementation doesn't follow the usual qpid portability strategy for
*not* introducing inline conditional compilation.
The way we do do this in qpid is to
Github user gemmellr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/6#issuecomment-99921669
The mentioned JIRA has been marked resolved, but the commits didnt include
the needed message to automatically close this PR. Can you check if the changes
resolve your
Github user ChugR closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/4
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled
GitHub user tibbetts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/7
Get qpid C++ building on OSX.
QPID-2536: Implement posix clock_gettime
QPID-4280: clock_gettime not available on Mac OS X
QPID-4278: Broken OS X Build
Add documentation to INSTALL and
GitHub user gemmellr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/5
QPID-6421: fix typo in README, testing GitHub integration
As per subject
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gemmellr/qpid trunk
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled
Github user gemmellr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/5#issuecomment-76446872
Test comment via GitHub
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Test reply via email
On 27 February 2015 at 18:34, gemmellr g...@git.apache.org wrote:
Github user gemmellr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid/pull/5#issuecomment-76446872
Test comment via GitHub
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
31 matches
Mail list logo
