On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:43 AM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache Qpid
> dispatch-router found with Coverity Scan.
>
> 157 new defect(s) introduced to Apache Qpid dispatch-router found with
> Coverity Scan.
>
>
> New defect(s) Reported-by:
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan.
238 new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found with Coverity Scan.
34 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the
recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
Wednesday, April 6, 2016 10:10:31 AM
> Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache Qpid dispatch-router
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache Qpid
> dispatch-router found with Coverity Scan.
>
> 5 new defect(s) intro
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan.
1 new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found with Coverity Scan.
7 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan.
7 new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found with Coverity Scan.
1 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 18:50 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 01/12/2015 06:00 PM, Chuck Rolke wrote:
Visual Studio 2010 x64 generates five new warnings compiling LossyLvq code.
The code may be correct and the compiler is known to warn on correct code.
That said, if the code could be reorganized
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan.
7 new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found with Coverity Scan.
New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 7 of 7 defect(s)
** CID 400915: Resource leak in object
On 01/11/2015 10:06 PM, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote:
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan.
1 new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found with Coverity Scan.
7 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the
- Original Message -
From: Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:55:23 AM
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
On 01/11/2015 10:06 PM, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote:
Please find the latest report on new
On 01/12/2015 06:00 PM, Chuck Rolke wrote:
Visual Studio 2010 x64 generates five new warnings compiling LossyLvq code.
The code may be correct and the compiler is known to warn on correct code.
That said, if the code could be reorganized to avoid the warnings maybe
Coverity would stop
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan.
1 new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found with Coverity Scan.
7 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
On 11/02/2014 10:49 PM, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote:
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan.
2 new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found with Coverity Scan.
New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 2 of 2 defect(s)
**
On 11/07/2014 10:50 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
One option would be to add a
QPID_LOG_NO_THROW(), say, that wraps the QPID_LOG() itself in a try/
catch. In the unlikely event of an exception there it would do nothing.
E.g. https://reviews.apache.org/r/27734
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan.
2 new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found with Coverity Scan.
New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 2 of 2 defect(s)
** CID 1250695: Uncaught exception
:41:51 PM EDT
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid
found with Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 2 of 2 defect(s)
** CID 1227186: Mixing enum types
Date: July 20, 2014 at 5:41:51 PM EDT
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid
found with Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 2 of 2 defect(s)
** CID
Yessir. I think I have a fix in passing with another commit coming up.
-Chuck
- Original Message -
From: Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 6:05:57 PM
Subject: RE: Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Great
Great - thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Rolke [mailto:cro...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 6:10 PM
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Yessir. I think I have a fix in passing with another commit coming up
FYI, folks. Looks like some items to address this week.
-Steve
Begin forwarded message:
From: scan-ad...@coverity.commailto:scan-ad...@coverity.com
Date: July 20, 2014 at 5:41:51 PM EDT
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new
: July 6, 2014 at 5:51:34 PM EDT
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid
found with Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 4 of 4 defect(s)
** CID 1224524: Big
FYI, Coverity changes this week.
-Steve
Begin forwarded message:
From: scan-ad...@coverity.commailto:scan-ad...@coverity.com
Date: July 6, 2014 at 5:51:34 PM EDT
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced
! Misspelled Coverity in commit log, that'll be there forever.
Embarrassed again.
Begin forwarded message:
From: scan-ad...@coverity.commailto:scan-ad...@coverity.com
Date: February 23, 2014 at 5:53:17 PM EST
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Hi,
Please find
Could someone familiar with C++ qpid-Ping please have a look at this sometime?
Thanks,
-Steve
Begin forwarded message:
From: scan-ad...@coverity.commailto:scan-ad...@coverity.com
Date: February 23, 2014 at 5:53:17 PM EST
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Hi
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
** CID 1127840: Use of untrusted string value (TAINTED_STRING)
CID
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
** CID 1063266: Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK)
/bindings/qpid/python/pythonPYTHON_wrap.cxx: 14138
** CID 1063265: Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK)
[mailto:philharveyonl...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Phil Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:09 AM
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Hi Steve,
I'd be happy to help make sense of the Java results.
I'll set up a Coverity account now
]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:41 AM
To: qpid
Cc: Steve Huston
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
As an aside, I notice that they seem to have enabled scanning of Java
projects as well as C++ now... we should maybe look to see what a
coverity
Huston
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
As an aside, I notice that they seem to have enabled scanning of Java
projects as well as C++ now... we should maybe look to see what a coverity
scan of the Java code looks like
-- Rob
snip
scan Java at that
time.
-Original Message-
From: philharveyonl...@googlemail.com
[mailto:philharveyonl...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Phil Harvey
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:09 AM
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Hi
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 7 of 18 defects
** CID 1042963: Uncaught exception (UNCAUGHT_EXCEPT)
: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid
found with Coverity Scan
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 7 of 18 defects
** CID 1042963: Uncaught exception (UNCAUGHT_EXCEPT
by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Ok - I'll give it a go, stay tuned.
-K
- Original Message -
From: Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 2:32:14 PM
Subject: RE: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Yes
of the
model to find out what it was actually doing.
-K
- Original Message -
From: Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Cc: shus...@riverace.com
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 6:46:55 PM
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Ok
going.
From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:41 AM
To: qpid
Cc: Steve Huston
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
As an aside, I notice that they seem to have enabled scanning of Java projects
as well as C++ now... we should
@qpid.apache.org
Cc: shus...@riverace.com
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 6:46:55 PM
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Ok - I'll give it a go, stay tuned.
-K
- Original Message -
From: Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
** CID 1040638: Mixing enum types (MIXED_ENUMS)
/qpidbuilds/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/acl/AclData.cpp: 184
** CID 1040637: Missing unlock (LOCK)
PM
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
CID 1040637: Missing unlock (LOCK)
/qpidbuilds/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/amqp_0_10/Connection.cpp: 379 (
lock)
376
377void
Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Unless I'm missing something subtle, this appears to be a false positive.
Coverity marked a few uses of ScopedLock with this error, but not all, which
seems curious.
-K
- Forwarded Message -
From: scan-ad
1, 2013 1:18:58 PM
Subject: RE: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
I agree, Ken. If anyone knows how to make Coverity stop this, please let me
know. Else I'll check into it. I know there are a few ways to mark things as
false positive.
-Original Message-
From
, but not all, which
seems curious.
-K
- Forwarded Message -
From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 5:39:43 PM
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 1:18:58 PM
Subject: RE: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
I agree, Ken. If anyone knows how to make Coverity stop this, please
let me know. Else I'll check into it. I know there are a few ways to
mark things as false
Ok - I'll give it a go, stay tuned.
-K
- Original Message -
From: Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 2:32:14 PM
Subject: RE: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid
Yes, there is a way - I can do it, probably because
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Apache-Qpid found
with Coverity Scan
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 7 of 64 defects
** CID 1033541: Unused pointer value (UNUSED_VALUE)
/bindings/qpid/perl/perlPERL_wrap.cxx: 4956
** CID 1033540:
43 matches
Mail list logo
