I agree, very well put RG !
In terms of the details, can people start assigning Release 5 JIRAs to
themselves and scoping them in, please? We can then update the
roadmap/feature list from the JIRAs people have identified for inclusion.
Regards,
Marnie
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Robert
On 1/15/09, Robert Greig robert.j.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
I buy the argument that a full java multi-protocol bonanza is not
achievable in M5 timeline. And I also agree that one of the key things
users want is a stable product even in unforseen production
circumstances, so flow to disk
Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
If the features on the page for M5 are more, shall we say, aspirational -
let's use them as a roadmap for 2009.
I'm certainly keen on understanding how our roadmap will take us to the
point where all Qpid
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
If the features on the page for M5 are more, shall we say, aspirational
-
let's use them as a roadmap for 2009.
I'm certainly keen on
Let's try to narrow this list down a bit for a target M5 timescale ?
As we've chatted about, I agree we should timebox our releases. But I think
the Doctor might struggle with that lot before end March :-)
Bfn,
Marnie
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Aidan Skinner ai...@apache.org wrote:
On
And I really think we should bin this silly Mx release numbering convention:-)
+1
For 5 I vote we drop the M.
Carl.
Robert Greig wrote:
2009/1/15 Aidan Skinner aidan.skin...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
If the features on the page for M5 are more, shall we say, aspirational -
let's use them as a roadmap for 2009.
I'm certainly keen on
2009/1/14 Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com:
On the c++ side I would personally like to see a relatively light list of
features (selectors, priorities) with more focus on consolidation (e.g.
ensuring that federation, clustering, ssl, sasl security layers, rdma etc
all work well in combination) and
Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com wrote:
We need to pick a close down date for M5, and then it would be good for
everyone to list the key things they want to do for it. I have started a
list here:
Hi Danushka,
We need to pick a close down date for M5, and then it would
be good for
everyone to list the key things they want to do for it. I
have started a
list here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/looking+to+pitch+in
Hi Carl,
I have started to work on the
Danushka Menikkumbura wrote:
We need to pick a close down date for M5, and then it would be good for
everyone to list the key things they want to do for it. I have started a
list here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/looking+to+pitch+in
Please add / edit as needed. I am
11 matches
Mail list logo
