Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread Gordon Sim
On 01/04/2010 06:41 PM, john dunning wrote: I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread Alan Conway
On 01/06/2010 06:14 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: On 01/04/2010 06:41 PM, john dunning wrote: I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. The difficulty I

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread Gordon Sim
On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote: On 01/06/2010 06:14 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: On 01/04/2010 06:41 PM, john dunning wrote: I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread john dunning
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:11 +, Gordon Sim wrote: On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote: Thats true, but I think it is still worth splitting out test sets for optional modules into separate files for the sake of clarity and readability. Yes, thats a fair point. Thanks all. For

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread Alan Conway
On 01/06/2010 11:20 AM, john dunning wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:11 +, Gordon Sim wrote: On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote: Thats true, but I think it is still worth splitting out test sets for optional modules into separate files for the sake of clarity and readability.

RE: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread Steve Huston
On 01/06/2010 11:20 AM, john dunning wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:11 +, Gordon Sim wrote: On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote: Thats true, but I think it is still worth splitting out test sets for optional modules into separate files for the sake of clarity and

Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-04 Thread john dunning
I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is optional. If you didn't configure for xml and

RE: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-04 Thread Steve Huston
Hi John, I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is optional. If you didn't

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-04 Thread Robert Godfrey
2010/1/4 john dunning j...@redhat.com I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-04 Thread Alan Conway
On 01/04/2010 02:43 PM, Robert Godfrey wrote: 2010/1/4 john dunningj...@redhat.com I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. The difficulty I have