On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Rajith Attapattu wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Rafael Schloming
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Some of you may recall that I ranted a bit just prior to the freeze for
>>> the
>>> 0.6 release about how lots of non-client related stuff has
Alan Conway wrote:
On 02/02/2010 04:23 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Some of you may recall that I ranted a bit just prior to the freeze for
the 0.6 release about how lots of non-client related stuff has been
accumulating in the python directory as of late. It was a bit too late
to do anything abo
Ken Giusti wrote:
Ah, yes - I see now. I'm ok with extras/qmf/qmf[2], but that begs the question - what about non-python QMF stuff, like other language bindings and cross-implementation interopt tests?
If we end up moving all qmf-related stuff into extras, then we'd probably need
flesh out
Ah, yes - I see now. I'm ok with extras/qmf/qmf[2], but that begs the
question - what about non-python QMF stuff, like other language bindings and
cross-implementation interopt tests?
If we end up moving all qmf-related stuff into extras, then we'd probably need
flesh out a bit more structu
Ken Giusti wrote:
Hi,
I've no problem with a cleanup reorg, but I'd like to keep the qmf version in
the dirname (wherever it may end up). e.g.:
qmf/ ---> qpid/extras/qmf/
qmf2/ ---> qpid/extras/qmf2/
Ah, I was a bit unclear in my notation, I was t
Hi,
I've no problem with a cleanup reorg, but I'd like to keep the qmf version in
the dirname (wherever it may end up). e.g.:
> > qmf/ ---> qpid/extras/qmf/
> > qmf2/ ---> qpid/extras/qmf2/
thanks,
-K
- "Rafael Schloming" wrote:
> Rafael Schlo
On 02/02/2010 04:23 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Some of you may recall that I ranted a bit just prior to the freeze for
the 0.6 release about how lots of non-client related stuff has been
accumulating in the python directory as of late. It was a bit too late
to do anything about it at the time, b
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Some of you may recall that I ranted a bit just prior to the freeze for the
0.6 release about how lots of non-client related stuff has been accumulating
in the python directory as of late. It was a bit too late to d
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Some of you may recall that I ranted a bit just prior to the freeze for the
> 0.6 release about how lots of non-client related stuff has been accumulating
> in the python directory as of late. It was a bit too late to do anything
> about it
Rafael Schloming wrote:
Some of you may recall that I ranted a bit just prior to the freeze for
the 0.6 release about how lots of non-client related stuff has been
accumulating in the python directory as of late. It was a bit too late
to do anything about it at the time, but as the freeze is ov
Some of you may recall that I ranted a bit just prior to the freeze for
the 0.6 release about how lots of non-client related stuff has been
accumulating in the python directory as of late. It was a bit too late
to do anything about it at the time, but as the freeze is over now, I'd
like to star
11 matches
Mail list logo
