Re: [racket-dev] Parametric/c (was Re: [plt] Push #22411: master branch updated)

2011-04-08 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > On Friday, April 8, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Robby Findler >> wrote: >>> I think I'm not in favor of the move of parametric/c into the contract >>> library. Sam and I had a discussion about this i

Re: [racket-dev] Parametric/c (was Re: [plt] Push #22411: master branch updated)

2011-04-08 Thread Robby Findler
On Friday, April 8, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Robby Findler > wrote: >> I think I'm not in favor of the move of parametric/c into the contract >> library. Sam and I had a discussion about this is Austin, tho, so >> maybe I'm misremembering the outcome? >

Re: [racket-dev] Parametric/c (was Re: [plt] Push #22411: master branch updated)

2011-04-08 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > I think I'm not in favor of the move of parametric/c into the contract > library. Sam and I had a discussion about this is Austin, tho, so > maybe I'm misremembering the outcome? One of us is definitely misremembering the outcome -- my memor

Re: [racket-dev] . . for-each: arity mismatch for procedure

2011-04-08 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Apr 8, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:05:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> At Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:29:10 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >>> I suspect that this is a bug >>> in arity checking/reporting (at Matthew's level). >> >> Me too, since I changed someth

[racket-dev] Parametric/c (was Re: [plt] Push #22411: master branch updated)

2011-04-08 Thread Robby Findler
I think I'm not in favor of the move of parametric/c into the contract library. Sam and I had a discussion about this is Austin, tho, so maybe I'm misremembering the outcome? Robby _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang

Re: [racket-dev] . . for-each: arity mismatch for procedure

2011-04-08 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:05:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:29:10 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > I suspect that this is a bug > > in arity checking/reporting (at Matthew's level). > > Me too, since I changed something related, but I haven't been able to > replicate the

Re: [racket-dev] bug in indenter

2011-04-08 Thread Robby Findler
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 14:49, Robby Findler > wrote: >> Thanks, that's now fixed. > > "the tabber incorrectly counted tab chars as spaces when doing indentation;" > > and the tabs where there because I had edited the file with emacs. an

Re: [racket-dev] bug in indenter

2011-04-08 Thread Pierpaolo Bernardi
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 14:49, Robby Findler wrote: > Thanks, that's now fixed. "the tabber incorrectly counted tab chars as spaces when doing indentation;" and the tabs where there because I had edited the file with emacs. and I was on a computer without my personal .emacs, which instructs it to

Re: [racket-dev] bug in indenter

2011-04-08 Thread Robby Findler
Thanks, that's now fixed. Robby On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > Please excuse me for not using the proper form for bug reports, but > with the web form I cannot attach files, and I cannot use the "report > bug" command in racket for firewall reasons. > > In the attach

Re: [racket-dev] racket-5.1{, .0.6} not building foreign interface not supported

2011-04-08 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:38:54 +0200, Marijn wrote: > I get this behavior with both --enable-foreign and --disable-foreign, > but I don't see how it could be relevant that foreign interface is not > supported my platform when I disabled foreign. If I disable it then it > should skip this part which f

Re: [racket-dev] racket-5.1{, .0.6} not building foreign interface not supported

2011-04-08 Thread Marijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Matthew, thanks for your quick response. On 04/08/11 14:14, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:45:50 +0200, Marijn wrote: >> subject is valid for both its meanings: >> >> 1) my build fails and complains "make-stubborn-will-executor: for

Re: [racket-dev] racket-5.1{, .0.6} not building foreign interface not supported

2011-04-08 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:45:50 +0200, Marijn wrote: > subject is valid for both its meanings: > > 1) my build fails and complains "make-stubborn-will-executor: foreign > interface not supported for this platform" > > 2) it seems impossible to disable foreign as I get this even if I pass > --disable

[racket-dev] bug in indenter

2011-04-08 Thread Pierpaolo Bernardi
Please excuse me for not using the proper form for bug reports, but with the web form I cannot attach files, and I cannot use the "report bug" command in racket for firewall reasons. In the attached file, line 89 is not indented correctly neither pressing tab with the cursor on the line nor with t