Re: [racket-dev] drRacket Close/Close tab

2011-08-31 Thread Marijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/25/11 19:30, Robby Findler wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Marijn wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi Robby, >> >> On 08/25/11 14:13, Robby Findler wrote: >>> The intention is that "close" means "close wi

[racket-dev] racket tests

2011-08-31 Thread Paulo J. Matos
Hi, I just changes a couple of things in the C code in order to remove some of the warnings by the C compilers. How can I ran the available racket tests so I can be more confident that I didn't break anything? Cheers, -- PMatos _ For list-re

Re: [racket-dev] racket tests

2011-08-31 Thread Ryan Culpepper
On 08/31/2011 02:51 AM, Paulo J. Matos wrote: Hi, I just changes a couple of things in the C code in order to remove some of the warnings by the C compilers. How can I ran the available racket tests so I can be more confident that I didn't break anything? See /collects/tests/racket/README for

Re: [racket-dev] drRacket Close/Close tab

2011-08-31 Thread Robby Findler
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Marijn wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/25/11 19:30, Robby Findler wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Marijn wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hi Robby, >>> >>> On 08/25/11 14:13, Robby Findl

Re: [racket-dev] drRacket Close/Close tab

2011-08-31 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Robby Findler wrote: On Linux, in my File menu the Ctrl-w shortcut is always listed as shortcut for Close, while Close Tab has no shortcut, but I see now that Ctrl-w's behavior is actually to close the current tab. So in this case my suggestion

Re: [racket-dev] drRacket Close/Close tab

2011-08-31 Thread Shriram Krishnamurthi
Robby, two comments on that Apple UI guideline document: 1. It makes a distinction between Close and Close All. 2. It never mentions the word "tab" (in the sense in which we're using it). Its unit of interaction appears to be the window, not the tab. In that sense, it doesn't appear to offer a

[racket-dev] Accidentally discovered small undocumented function in FFI lib?

2011-08-31 Thread John Clements
I wanted to convert a cstruct to a list today, and couldn't find a way to do it, so defined my own ->list function... only to discover that it was already defined for me! It seems to work as expected--should I add it to the documentation, in the list headed "The resulting bindings are as follo

Re: [racket-dev] racket tests

2011-08-31 Thread Eli Barzilay
7 hours ago, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > On 08/31/2011 02:51 AM, Paulo J. Matos wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just changes a couple of things in the C code in order to remove some > > of the warnings by the C compilers. > > > > How can I ran the available racket tests so I can be more confident that > > I d

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #23408: master branch updated

2011-08-31 Thread Eli Barzilay
An hour ago, sa...@racket-lang.org wrote: > +Modified to use `syntax-parse' and multiple macros by Sam > +Tobin-Hochstadt, 2011. AFAICT, you're not using anything that `synatx-rules' can't do, so what's the point? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:

Re: [racket-dev] drRacket Close/Close tab

2011-08-31 Thread Eli Barzilay
6 hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > The other three applications (Pidgin, Epiphany, Gedit) all follow > the behavior described in the HIG: there is only a Close menu entry > (no Close Tab), it closes the current tab, and its shortcut is > Ctrl-w. > > I think we should follow the platform gui

Re: [racket-dev] Accidentally discovered small undocumented function in FFI lib?

2011-08-31 Thread Eli Barzilay
Four hours ago, John Clements wrote: > I wanted to convert a cstruct to a list today, and couldn't find a > way to do it, so defined my own ->list > function... only to discover that it was already defined for me! It > seems to work as expected--should I add it to the documentation, in > the list

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #23408: master branch updated

2011-08-31 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > An hour ago, sa...@racket-lang.org wrote: >> +Modified to use `syntax-parse' and multiple macros by Sam >> +Tobin-Hochstadt, 2011. > > AFAICT, you're not using anything that `synatx-rules' can't do, so > what's the point? Better error message

[racket-dev] OT: ld static linking + linux version numbers -> ??

2011-08-31 Thread John Clements
TOTALLY OFF-TOPIC, sorry: I have an autoconf script that's failing to detect a certain library, and I've tracked it down to a failure of ld -lasound foo.c ..which tells me that it can't find -lasound. Digging around in /usr/lib, I see that there's a libasound.so.2, but not a libasound.so. I

Re: [racket-dev] OT: ld static linking + linux version numbers -> ??

2011-08-31 Thread Jon Rafkind
On 08/31/2011 05:53 PM, John Clements wrote: > TOTALLY OFF-TOPIC, sorry: > > I have an autoconf script that's failing to detect a certain library, and > I've tracked it down to a failure of > > ld -lasound foo.c > > ..which tells me that it can't find -lasound. Digging around in /usr/lib, I > se

[racket-dev] online check syntax deadlock: can you help?

2011-08-31 Thread Robby Findler
I've been seeing for some time now a deadlock in online check syntax. That is, after a while it just gets stuck and fails to complete the online check syntax. Typically what you see is the little blue dot come on but the cpu load drop to zero without any check syntax arrows ever showing up. Matthe

Re: [racket-dev] OT: ld static linking + linux version numbers -> ??

2011-08-31 Thread John Clements
On Aug 31, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote: > On 08/31/2011 05:53 PM, John Clements wrote: >> TOTALLY OFF-TOPIC, sorry: >> >> I have an autoconf script that's failing to detect a certain library, and >> I've tracked it down to a failure of >> >> ld -lasound foo.c >> >> ..which tells me th

Re: [racket-dev] OT: ld static linking + linux version numbers -> ??

2011-08-31 Thread Eli Barzilay
Three hours ago, John Clements wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote: > > > AFAIK to get the .so file you are supposed to install the > > development versions of the library. > > Ah! Okay, this makes sense. Uh, sort of. The rationale is that applications need to specify a ve

Re: [racket-dev] OT: ld static linking + linux version numbers -> ??

2011-08-31 Thread John Clements
On Aug 31, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Three hours ago, John Clements wrote: >> >> On Aug 31, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote: >> >>> AFAIK to get the .so file you are supposed to install the >>> development versions of the library. >> >> Ah! Okay, this makes sense. Uh, sort of

Re: [racket-dev] drRacket Close/Close tab

2011-08-31 Thread Eric Dobson
As a sample of OS X (10.7) applications I looked at Chrome, Safari, Terminal and Adium. In all of them Command-W did 'close tab' and Shift-Command-W did 'close window'. In the first three they are actually called that, Adium uses 'close chat' and 'close'. Given that Safari and Terminal are Apple

Re: [racket-dev] online check syntax deadlock: can you help?

2011-08-31 Thread John Clements
On Aug 31, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > I've been seeing for some time now a deadlock in online check syntax. > That is, after a while it just gets stuck and fails to complete the > online check syntax. Typically what you see is the little blue dot > come on but the cpu load drop to z