On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> I've just committed support for building Racket automatically on the
> Travis continuous integration service. See
> https://travis-ci.org/samth/racket/ for the current build state. This
> doesn't track the actual `plt/racket` repositor
I'm happy to enable sticky mode only when the `make' line is something
like
make PKGS="..." STICKY_MODE=on
Any objections?
At Sat, 6 Jul 2013 09:43:46 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> I just got horribly confused because somehow I messed up passing a manual
> command-line to link-all.rkt and then
What about a `make` target (maybe named `rebuild`) that remembers the
previous PKGS setting? That seems a little less stateful, and would be
perfect for the reasons that led me to ask for sticky mode.
Sam
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I'm happy to enable sticky mode only
Thanks.
Robby
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> What about a `make` target (maybe named `rebuild`) that remembers the
> previous PKGS setting? That seems a little less stateful, and would be
> perfect for the reasons that led me to ask for sticky mode.
>
> Sam
>
> On
Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> Planet attempts to solve this problem technically by (a) having all
> collections be prefixed by / and (b) mandating
> a centralized server that enforces unique s and unique
> s per author. Since Racket packages don't have a
> mandated central server we can't enforc
Yesterday, Robby Findler wrote:
> Raco test runs the file if there is not test sub module. Fwiw.
That's what I thought first, with "run" being the same as what racket
does. But it doesn't: it just runs the toplevel module as usual when
the file is required (and does so unconditionally, of course
The problem with that is that there is no way to ensure that there is
only one package named "data/red-black-tree" and there can be two
mutually incompatible universes of packages for Carl's rbts and mine,
for instance. Furthermore, it has the internal linking problem.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:11
Just now, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> The problem with that is that there is no way to ensure that there
> is only one package named "data/red-black-tree"
There's no need to ensure such a thing -- and IIUC, the current system
doesn't do that neither modulo a bunch of blessed packages.
> and there can
On Jul 7, 2013, at 12:08 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> It would be nice to have some way of doing it with contracts, but
> that's obviously impractical -- so I think that a good way to solve it
> and other such problems is to add a parameter for the name used in
> read errors, and making `raise-rea
I admit I have not built DrRacket in a couple of months. I just did a git
pull, rebuilt ("make"), and now if I open:
~/test/plt/git/plt/racket/DrRacket.app
it runs, but if I move the racket directory to where I used to put it
(/usr/local) and try running:
/usr/local/racket/DrRacket.app
i
Offhand, I see one problem: `make' creates links with absolute paths to
the packages in "pkgs". I'll fix that and check for other problems.
It's possible that
make pkg-links
in the new place will fix your problem.
If not, you may have to move before building, or try a snapshot from
http://
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:39 PM, wrote:
> ---
> OLD/pkgs/typed-racket-pkgs/typed-racket-lib/typed-racket/typecheck/tc-toplevel.rkt
> +++
> NEW/pkgs/typed-racket-pkgs/typed-racket-lib/typed-racket/typecheck/tc-toplevel.rkt
> @@ -392,7 +392,8 @@
> (match a
>
At Mon, 8 Jul 2013 17:01:24 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:39 PM, wrote:
>
> > ---
> OLD/pkgs/typed-racket-pkgs/typed-racket-lib/typed-racket/typecheck/tc-toplevel.r
> kt
> > +++
> NEW/pkgs/typed-racket-pkgs/typed-racket-lib/typed-racket/typecheck/tc-toplevel.r
>
Repairs pushed --- thanks for the report!
At Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:39:27 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Offhand, I see one problem: `make' creates links with absolute paths to
> the packages in "pkgs". I'll fix that and check for other problems.
>
> It's possible that
>
> make pkg-links
>
> in th
The new makefile target to re-use the previous `PKGS' value is `again'.
At Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:28:40 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> What about a `make` target (maybe named `rebuild`) that remembers the
> previous PKGS setting? That seems a little less stateful, and would be
> perfect for the r
What is our answer?
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Ben Duan
> Subject: [racket] Why experienced programmers don’t use comments?
> Date: July 8, 2013 9:41:10 PM EDT
> To: us...@racket-lang.org
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have a question here. There’s an extensive use of comments in HtDP. But
> th
16 matches
Mail list logo
