Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #133

See -- [...truncated 2.26 MB...] [mxmlc] using source file: c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-asjs_MXTests\mustella\tests\mxtests\basicTests\bin\js-debug\org

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #132

See -- [...truncated 2.26 MB...] [mxmlc] using source file: c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-asjs_MXTests\mustella\tests\mxtests\basicTests\bin\js-debug\org

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

It was getting part of the way through and then dropped out. I just tried again and it worked. Jenkins is running again, although it’s complaining that some of the plugins should be updated. I’m leaving that alone for now. Harbs > On Nov 14, 2018, at 12:44 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I'm not a

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

I'm not able to try right now. When you restart the server, RDP doesn't work for a minute or two. If the OS is applying updates right now, it could take several minutes before RDP comes up. So, try again tomorrow. I will try to remember to check in about 5 hours. -Alex On 11/13/18, 2:42 P

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

I just updated Windows and now I can’t log in through RDP… :-( Can you get in? > On Nov 13, 2018, at 9:41 PM, Harbs wrote: > > Thanks. I got it. > > I successfully restarted the server and the compiler built successfully. > > It’s building js-only now. When that’s done I’ll build asjs. > > A

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #131

See Changes: [aharui] try to fix release script now that repos are re-cloned so they don't [harbs] Cleaned up a bit [yishayjobs] Default data type for list is an array [carlosrovi

Re: What is royale-asjs.code-workspace?

Hi, feel free to remove, and add to .gitignore. I thought it was a good point to keep adding all libraries to VS Code, but some days ago I saw that there's a reference to SDK that take the path of the user, so it makes it useless for other unless I see some way to use an environment var in VS Code.

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs #1563

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #1877

See

Re: What is royale-asjs.code-workspace?

I think Carlos added it. VS Code supports multi-root workspaces.[1] It’s sort of the equivalent of dependent projects in Eclipse. Should it be in the repo? Dunno.It could be useful, but it probably should be more complete if we keep it. [1]https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/multi-root-

Re: Private API names

> Throughout the history of SWCs, I can "know" that if I change the base > class hierarchy in a way that doesn't change the API surface of that base > class, that I don't have to re-compile the downstream SWCs. With the depth > approach, we are changing those rules, so that's why I am not in favor

What is royale-asjs.code-workspace?

Should this really be in our repos? And only contain references to a few projects? -Alex

Re: Private API names

Throughout the history of SWCs, I can "know" that if I change the base class hierarchy in a way that doesn't change the API surface of that base class, that I don't have to re-compile the downstream SWCs. With the depth approach, we are changing those rules, so that's why I am not in favor of a

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

Thanks. I got it. I successfully restarted the server and the compiler built successfully. It’s building js-only now. When that’s done I’ll build asjs. After everything builds, it looks like Windows and Jenkins both need updates applied. Thanks, Harbs > On Nov 13, 2018, at 9:09 PM, Alex Harui

Re: Private API names

Actually, I hadn't considered the issue you just brought up about the inheritance chain changing in a separately compiled project. I would say that is a valid concern and probably means that "depth" approach is not the right one. I think the swc issue is a specific type of issue with the 'depth'

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-compiler #562

See

Re: Royale Compiler Brings Wrong Dependencies

Well, I've been thinking about splitting MXRoyale into multiple SWCs. MXRoyale would contain emulations from the Flex framework.swc and mx.swc, MXRPC would contain emulations from Flex rpc.swc, and MXCharts would contain emulations from Flex charts.swc. Not sure about other Flex SWCs just yet.

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

It is in the private@ archives from around December 28 of last year. On 11/13/18, 10:16 AM, "Harbs" wrote: I don’t think I have the login for the VM. > On Nov 13, 2018, at 7:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I would recommend restarting the whole VM. It would prove someone el

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

I don’t think I have the login for the VM. > On Nov 13, 2018, at 7:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I would recommend restarting the whole VM. It would prove someone else knows > how besides me. > > Get Outlook for Android> > > __

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

I would recommend restarting the whole VM. It would prove someone else knows how besides me. Get Outlook for Android From: Harbs Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 9:47:28 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: r

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

> What do you mean manually ? From the Jenkins interface. > On Nov 13, 2018, at 5:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > What do you mean manually ? I just connect with PC remotely and saw a lot > of Flash Player window opened. I did close them and maybe now we could run > build. > > P

Re: Royale Compiler Brings Wrong Dependencies

No. I didn’t realize you did that much work already. I guess we should include in the release notes that MXRoyale effecting other frameworks is a known issue and explain the work-around. > Isn't the workaround to remove MXRoyale.swc if you have no plans to use it? That’s one work-around. Anothe

Re: Royale Compiler Brings Wrong Dependencies

I think most of the people will end using MXRoyale at some point. For example, I'm using Jewel at 94%, MX at 5% (RPC, RO classes) and Basic at 1% (UIBase, and probably some other class or bead), seems a combination that more people could star using, so removing MX/Spark doesn't seem the best option

Re: Royale Compiler Brings Wrong Dependencies

The release branch has been cut and I am verifying the RC. Should I just scrap the 8 hours I spent making that happen? Isn't the workaround to remove MXRoyale.swc if you have no plans to use it? -Alex On 11/13/18, 2:45 AM, "Harbs" wrote: I hit this issue with another app. This

Re: feature/FocusEvents branch

Ap, ok, thanks, I thought it was an issue in Royale, that needs just a bit of organization and cleaning of imports, that should happen when work is in progress, so now all is more clear thanks! :) El mar., 13 nov. 2018 a las 17:03, Josh Tynjala () escribió: > I think I know how to resolve this i

Re: feature/FocusEvents branch

I think I know how to resolve this issue, as mentioned here: https://github.com/BowlerHatLLC/vscode-as3mxml/issues/218 I simply haven't had the time to dig in and make it happen yet. - Josh On 2018/11/13 10:31:22, Harbs wrote: > Josh has had trouble getting this to work. > > Some details on

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

Hi Harbs, What do you mean manually ? I just connect with PC remotely and saw a lot of Flash Player window opened. I did close them and maybe now we could run build. Piotr wt., 13 lis 2018 o 16:38 Harbs napisał(a): > I tried rerunning the build manually and it ran out of memory. > > Does the s

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

I tried rerunning the build manually and it ran out of memory. Does the server need to be restarted? > On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:46 PM, apacheroyal...@gmail.com wrote: > > See > > > ---

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #561

See -- [...truncated 157.03 KB...] [junit] [junit] 610 bytes written to

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1876

See Changes: [harbs] Assign topLevelApplication -- [...truncated 798.86 KB...] junit-jar: commons-compress-jar-check: commons-compress-jar:

Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run

One more thing: 1.- As I said before we are not using *channelSet* (I didn't get it to work, but didn't dedicate much time since was not critical): just use *endPoint + destination* 2.- *Please check examples in our repo to see how MX RO is used*, and transform yours to that and try good luck

Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run

Hi Alina, my recomendation is that you start with a very basic AMF call to test communications. Maybe adding some simple getString method that sends a String and retrieves the string modified would be enough, so you can figure what's could be wrong. I can confirm you that MX RO is working and we'r

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #560

See -- [...truncated 139.79 KB...] commons-compress-jar: commons-lang3-jar-check: commons-lang3-jar: main: compile.tests: [echo] compiler is C:/Program

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1561

See Changes: [aharui] try to fix release script now that repos are re-cloned so they don't [harbs] Cleaned up a bit [yishayjobs] Default data type for list is an array [carlosrovira] Rev

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #1875

See

Re: Royale Compiler Brings Wrong Dependencies

I hit this issue with another app. This is going to be a problem for lots of folks, I think we need some solution to this problem before our next release. Should we just subclass MXRoyale components for now and deal with the bigger problem later? Harbs > On Oct 14, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Alex Haru

RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run

Hi Carlos, We have added to channel: false in services-config.xml file But still our Royale Application is unable to call java side method. Thank, Alina Kazi -Original Message- From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 3:12 PM To: dev@roya

RE: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run

Hi Alex, Yes I am running the bin/js-debug/index.html, after setting breakpoints on browser's debugger Our roLogin is set as [1] and on click to LoginButton. No error on browser's debugger is shown. [1] https://github.com/alinakazi/DebugBrowserConsole Thanks, Alina -Original Message

Re: feature/FocusEvents branch

Josh has had trouble getting this to work. Some details on related issues: https://github.com/BowlerHatLLC/vscode-as3mxml/issues/155 https://github.com/BowlerHatLLC/vscode-as3mxml/issues/265 > On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:02 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > If VSCode and Moonshine cannot handle the way we b

Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run

Hi Alina, can you confirm that you turned off small messages in BlazeDS ? thanks El mar., 13 nov. 2018 a las 8:28, Alina Kazi () escribió: > Hi Alex, > > We are not getting any error on browser console. > I have set breakpoints on my java side code. Method I am calling from > Royale Application

Re: feature/FocusEvents branch

Hi Alex, El mar., 13 nov. 2018 a las 3:02, Alex Harui () escribió: > If VSCode and Moonshine cannot handle the way we build the projects right > now from the command-line, then they should probably make changes so it > works. I would guess that they do but the project files are not set up > corr

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1874

See Changes: [harbs] Cleaned up a bit [yishayjobs] Default data type for list is an array -- [...truncated 429.53 KB...] [java] Apache

Re: UIBase.addedToParent()

loadBeadFromValuesManager does check first, but that all does have overhead. How much, I’m not sure, but I can see that an app which might do a lot of moving around elements can take a hit. > On Nov 13, 2018, at 11:17 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I see that beads specified in the beads array coul

Re: UIBase.addedToParent()

I see that beads specified in the beads array could get added each time, but I thought that loadBeadFromValuesManager checked the strand first. If not, maybe it should. In Flex, there was enough overhead in getting a dialog up that it was recommended to create something once and re-parent it.

Re: [royale-asjs] branch feature/modal created (now 1633099)

I have a few concerns with this and suggestions welcome: 1. Due to the bead lifecycle, declared beads are only added after the component is added to a parent. This means that you can’t just “new” an MXML component which has modal beads without first adding it somewhere. 2. As mentioned in the ot

Re: UIBase.addedToParent()

My point is not modal specifically. The issue is that moving components around as well as states which might change the parent of a component. Recreating components have two problems: 1. There’s the overhead and garbage collection involved. 2. You lose state. The problem with UIBase is that all

Re: UIBase.addedToParent()

I'm not sure I understand why "modal" matters. It sounds like you have some display object you want to parent and unparent and then re-parent. For sure, lots of code worked that way in Flex but does it have to work that way in Royale? Why not just toss the instance when you unparent it and cr

UIBase.addedToParent()

I ran into a problem today trying to create a “modal” bead. Every time a component is added or moved from one parent to another, addedToParent() is called which adds all the declared beads as well as looks up beads from the ValuesManager. Besides having extra overhead, this results in duplicate