Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #736

See -- [...truncated 2.11 MB...] [mxmlc]

Re: Example of access external JS using Apache Royale

Wouldn’t it be a nice proof of concept if we tried to implement a widely used js lib into Royale? There are a lot of js packages that are used thousands of times a day, like moment.js, lodash, … Dany > Op 1 mei 2019, om 01:13 heeft Alex Harui het > volgende geschreven: > > Isn't the ACE

Re: Building a Faq for Royale

Hi Alex, Would it be an idea to launch every new question on this list with a [FAQ] prefix, discuss it and when the answer is accepted, post it to the Faq section? Dany > Op 1 mei 2019, om 00:45 heeft Alex Harui het > volgende geschreven: > > FWIW, I would much prefer that the FAQ be part

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #735

See -- [...truncated 2.03 MB...] [mxmlc] using source file:

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

I'm fine with starting with your example. Are other versions in Royale including the build number? Are you expecting the build systems to update that file on each build? That might be trickier. The Maven builds check for uncommitted files. Regarding your other response, I'm not sure that

Re: How to try locally Royale-docs repo

IIRC, I installed Jekyll. Then run: jekyll build --config local_config.yml Then some output folder contains html. There is an Ant script that runs Jekyll. HTH, -Alex On 4/30/19, 2:43 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: Hi, I saw Josh was working on Royale-docs repo. I'd be

Re: Example of access external JS using Apache Royale

Isn't the ACE editor already an example? Or maybe there are different scenarios for external JS usage. -Alex On 4/30/19, 2:42 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: Hi, I'm planing to make a blog example about using external JS or CSS in Apache Royale since people ask for it, and I

Re: Royale in a Week

Hi Andrew, Thanks for taking this on. We have repos for code and for docs (royale-docs) and dev@ for communication. And we have a wiki. We should try to use these tools as much as possible unless there is a significant productivity gain to be using some other way. That's because by using

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

Don't need every SWC with a version. Just one for the whole SDK would be fine. I proposed just a single one stored in the core. We can modify the build file to just point to the single file instead of doing a path search. See the start of my example [1]. [1]

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

We can through an old mechanism that appears to be left from the Apache Flex side that does just this. Around line1192 of the root build.xml [1]. It specifically hunts down files called "Version.as" and uses RegEx to update the version number and build number. So when the SDK is built for

Re: Building a Faq for Royale

FWIW, I would much prefer that the FAQ be part of the royale-docs so we can get PRs from folks. Thoughts? -Alex On 4/30/19, 2:08 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: Hi Dany, just created you account. I write it to your @mac.com account now to send you user/pass if you don't get

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

To be more specific: Version.as in Flex was included into every class. I do not recommend doing that in Royale. It didn't have enough value for the cost. FlexVersion.as in Flex was used for runtime versioning. Code could use it to take different paths. I hope we don't need that in Royale.

SOF question about enterFrame in Royale need some response

Hi, Andrew posted in SOF a question about enterFrame event in JS [1]. I'm not sure about how this is done in Royale since I didn't use it for many time since Flash times. Hope others could give it some response thanks https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/apache-royale -- Carlos Rovira

How to try locally Royale-docs repo

Hi, I saw Josh was working on Royale-docs repo. I'd be interested in fix and some things and be able to do some changes, but to do so I need to know how I can try it in my local Mac. Someone can point me how you are working on this? I have the repo cloned, now I need to know what tool I should

Example of access external JS using Apache Royale

Hi, I'm planing to make a blog example about using external JS or CSS in Apache Royale since people ask for it, and I think is one of the key points for people that wants to use Royale. My plan is to create a simple example that imports a JS script and then use bracket access. The example in

Re: Royale in a Week

Hi Andrew, don't understand what you mean with "My first step would be to review the old curriculum" are you talking to create a curriculum app with royale? I think the best way to go over Royale in a week is to use the same structure as Flex in a week when possible. And nobody better than you

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

Well, since others techs make that maybe it would be ok to have it baked. Right now I don't have a strong opinion about what to do maybe others could bring more light, but Version class seems ok to me, and hope we could have it get the version directly without manual modifications what will very

Re: Building a Faq for Royale

Hi Dany, just created you account. I write it to your @mac.com account now to send you user/pass if you don't get nothing let me know privately thanks El mar., 30 abr. 2019 a las 17:19, Dany Dhondt () escribió: > No. It IS the right address. Don’t know why it marked as INVALID > Dany > >

Re: extending IUIBase with interfaces (was: Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0))

Hi Carlos, I've said this before: I feel bad sometimes that Flex taught folks some questionable programming practices. The short answer: -Don't reference concrete classes -Choose composition patterns over inheritance The long answer: Yishay and Andrew are headed in the right direction. A

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

Well that would work in addition too, but not replace what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the SDK having a built in version. A version bead would be more building an app using the SDK and the app having it's own version. -Mark K On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:39 PM Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > >

Royale in a Week

I would be happy to work on creating a Royale equivalent to "Flex in a Week". My first step would be to review the old curriculum and see where it needs updating to eliminate Flex-specific stuff that Royale does not have or need to worry about. I would then want to assemble a new curriculum (what

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

+1 to Josh's idea that we provide bead with logic which serves version. Thanks, Piotr On Tue, Apr 30, 2019, 8:18 PM Kessler CTR Mark J wrote: > As an example, here is how to access the version number in other > languages. Some easier to use than others. Looks like the easiest ones > are just

RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

As an example, here is how to access the version number in other languages. Some easier to use than others. Looks like the easiest ones are just static const strings. Flex[1]: mx.core.FlexVersion.CURRENT_VERSION Dotnet[2]: System.Environment.Version

Stars in Github

Hi!, one more important thing to pursue: Get stars in Apache Royale ASJS Github repo: https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/stargazers We currently have 222...we need much much more!! :) projects are more valuable if this number grows. So share your love and give us star! :) -- Carlos

Re: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

What if Royale had some kind of VersionBead that you could add to the main application? It could be optional with Basic, but maybe baked in by default with Express and other component sets that are less focused on small output size. - Josh On 2019/04/30 10:46:27, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:

Re: Building a Faq for Royale

No. It IS the right address. Don’t know why it marked as INVALID Dany Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 30 apr. 2019 om 17:04 heeft Carlos Rovira het > volgende geschreven: > > Dany, > please sent me the email I must use privately, since yours in the list puts > "invalid" so I think is not the

Re: Building a Faq for Royale

Hi Dany, I already shared the actual FAQ link [1], maybe you missed it. You can change it whatever you want, just think that changes will need approve of the rest. I'll sent you know credentials in private thanks! [1] https://royale.apache.org/faq/ El mar., 30 abr. 2019 a las 16:54, Dany

Re: Building a Faq for Royale

Dany, please sent me the email I must use privately, since yours in the list puts "invalid" so I think is not the want you use. thanks! El mar., 30 abr. 2019 a las 17:03, Carlos Rovira () escribió: > Hi Dany, > > I already shared the actual FAQ link [1], maybe you missed it. > You can change it

Re: Building a Faq for Royale

Hi Carlos, That’s ok. Maybe you could setup a Faq section and create the empty base page so I don’t mess anything up? Thx Dany > Op 30 apr. 2019, om 16:42 heeft Carlos Rovira het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi Dany, > > I can give you access to our pre production web site, so you can change

Re: extending IUIBase with interfaces (was: Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0))

Hi Yishay, El mar., 30 abr. 2019 a las 13:27, Yishay Weiss () escribió: > It seems to me this is more an AS3 issue than a Royale issue. It would be > cool to enhance AS to include features such as Mixins, but as long as we > have a simple single inheritance model the solution you implemented is

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

Hi Mark, sorry but all you state can be solved with the solution I exposed to you. There's no need to add an identifier to an SDK since you can add it yourself from the SDK you downloaded or get by the multiple ways available. In any of the cases the numbers are not baked into code, but are

Building a Faq for Royale

Hi, Seems the idea of having a faq section on our website is supported. I’m willing to start such a faq. How do we tackle this? Do we need a database or keep it plain text? Anyone know of an online tool to manage it? Who’s managing the website itself? Thoughts? thx Dany

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #734

See -- [...truncated 2.04 MB...] [mxmlc] using source file:

RE: extending IUIBase with interfaces (was: Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0))

It seems to me this is more an AS3 issue than a Royale issue. It would be cool to enhance AS to include features such as Mixins, but as long as we have a simple single inheritance model the solution you implemented is probably optimal. I personally wouldn’t worry too much about code

RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0)

Lol, I can't seem to explain it properly. Take maven/ant/config files out of the equation it doesn't matter for this example. This has to do with getting some identifying information into the official SDK releases. We don't want to pass variables as an SDK user. We want the official SDK to

Re: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0 -- submit your bid for assistance to the group by Friday May 3

Hi Dany, El mar., 30 abr. 2019 a las 5:55, Dany Dhondt () escribió: > Hi Justin, > > As much as I would like to write an article on Royale vs. competitors, I > can’t do so at this moment because I don’t have enough Royale knowledge > yet. But there are things I could point at so that the Royale

Re: extending IUIBase with interfaces (was: Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0))

Hi Andrew, thanks for your thoughts. One of the main problems here that I didn't put on my email is that you loose the opportunity to ask if the components is a "StyledUIBase", since we are "bifurcating" the code when implement in Group and DataContainerBase and others the interface

Let's bump Royale version to 1.0

Hi Guys, Thank you so far for a great discussion. I see that there is an obvious needs to improve documentation the most. I would like to express my personal feelings regarding releasing anything what is not 1.0 after 0.9.6. Based on my experience with this project I don't believe that releasing

Apache Royale in StackOverFlow: tag apache-royale created

Hi, Just let you know that Frank Delporte created apache-royale tag in Stacker flow few hours ago! :) https://twitter.com/frankdelporte/status/1122945535604871168?s=21 -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira

[JOB] Moonshine-IDE.com is hiring contractors to bring Apache Royale to version 1.0

Hi Alex, Thank you very much for providing insight into the proper way to approach these matters in the Apache way. I will be mindful of the specific wording in the future. Hi Dany, It sounds to me like you know a lot about React! Maybe you could start the React part of the comparison

RE: extending IUIBase with interfaces (was: Re: Version property (was: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0))

Hi Carlos Isn't this similar to the challenge that Adobe had with EventDispatcher? which I think is why there are two possibilities: a) derive from EventDispatcher b) implement IEventDispatcher In the second case, you have to create an instance of EventDispatcher within your class, and then