Thanks
From: cont...@cristallium.com
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 1:02 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Hi all,
If it may help : I have just downloaded 0.9.10 RC4
run "ant all" and set "y"
Makes sense.
From: Maria Jose Esteve
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 2:45 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I think I have a suspicion why now the generated files, when I compile Theme,
don't have any difference
-Mensaje original-
De: Maria Jose Esteve
Enviado el: viernes, 12 de mayo de 2023 11:13
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Yes, I understand that, but "until now" ALWAYS, ALWAYS, even if I hadn't
changed the sass file, defaults.css
By the way,... forgive me if this is a simple question... I compile TDJ
fine, I don't see errors what are those errors you are talking about in
the previous emails?
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Yishay Weiss
Enviado el: viernes, 12 de mayo de 2023 10:12
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Yishay Weiss
Enviado el: viernes, 12 de mayo de 2023 10:12
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Has the sass file changed? If not, I expect the defaults.css files won't change
either.
__
Has the sass file changed? If not, I expect the defaults.css files won't change
either.
From: Maria Jose Esteve
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 10:36 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I am compiling Theme
-sass-compile,option-with-swf
-Drat.skip=true
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Yishay Weiss
Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 17:21
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the
o: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes in
TDJ build.
From: Yishay Weiss
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [D
The Approval script finishes successfully for me after reverting the changes in
TDJ build.
From: Yishay Weiss
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:48 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Hi Maria,
After trying to fix
: Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:55 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Yes, I don't know if I got confused when I moved it or it was because of my
system.
In my last tests it said "n" and it worked for me, sorry for the noise.
On
will look at it this afternoon to see if I can
fix it. I do it in the develop branch right?
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Yishay Weiss
Enviado el: jueves, 11 de mayo de 2023 10:29
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I also chose 'no' for designmodo and it
I also chose 'no' for designmodo and it's running for me so far (waiting for
the TDJ fail).
From: Maria Jose Esteve
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 1:40 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Really?... maybe I did
080/>
From: Josh Tynjala
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 11:03 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
While I was having lunch, I thought of another reason why I'm not inclined
to vote for a build where the approval script doesn't pass.
In th
Really?... maybe I did something wrong? Now I'll see.
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Josh Tynjala
Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2023 22:25
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
On my machine, I can answer "n" t
arily
> implies no release. What do other folks think?
>
> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
> obligatory?
>
> From: Josh Tynjala
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject:
sider whether this type of regression necessarily
>> implies no release. What do other folks think?
>>
>> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
>> obligatory?
>> ____________
>> From: Josh Tynjala
>> Sent: Wednesday
t; implies no release. What do other folks think?
>
> Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being
> obligatory?
>
> From: Josh Tynjala
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re
folks think?
Has anybody confirmed Maria's issues with designmodo fonts being obligatory?
From: Josh Tynjala
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 7:17 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
I'm getting the same failure when
gt; From: Piotr Zarzycki
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
>
> Hello,
>
> I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf.
> Anyone have same issue ? I'm on
Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a blocker.
From: Piotr Zarzycki
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3
Hello,
I was trying to vote. I got following
Hello,
I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf.
Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a)
compile:
Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc
ROYALE_HOME:
21 matches
Mail list logo
