Sure! Let's do this! :)
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019, 9:12 PM Olaf Krueger wrote:
> Thanks, Alex for this proposal!
>
> @Piotr
> I created a new issue [1] and a related feature branch.
> We'll maybe find some free cycles soon in order to achieve this together...
> with your help? ;-
>
> Thank you!
Thanks, Alex for this proposal!
@Piotr
I created a new issue [1] and a related feature branch.
We'll maybe find some free cycles soon in order to achieve this together...
with your help? ;-
Thank you!
Olaf
[1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/394
--
Sent from:
+1 for that idea! Go ahead Olaf! I can help you if you need.
Thanks, Piotr
śr., 13 lut 2019 o 18:05 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> Hi Olaf,
>
> As soon as you say a scenario is rare, then it definitely shouldn't be
> baked into the base classes for PAYG reasons.
>
> It occurs to me that for any
Hi Olaf,
As soon as you say a scenario is rare, then it definitely shouldn't be baked
into the base classes for PAYG reasons.
It occurs to me that for any component that implements IStrand (like UIBase),
you could define a bead that goes on the strand that would generate an
identifier. Or
Hi Alex,
>I'd be interested in understanding the scenario where you create multiple
instances with the exact same set of properties.
Even if these scenarios are probably rare:
One scenario is to display multiple instances of the same UI component at
the same time. After initialization, they are
For PAYG reasons, identifiers are not added to every object "just-in-case". If
you need them, add them.
I'd be interested in understanding the scenario where you create multiple
instances with the exact same set of properties. I would think it would be
better to share one instance in that
Interesting, thanks for sharing!
Olaf
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
Hi Olaf,
This is how it looks like in intellij [1] - Each object has such unique
number. If it's the same instance of object you will have the same number
in other place of applications.
[1] https://imgur.com/jG9MM2f
Thanks,
Piotr
wt., 12 lut 2019 o 09:59 Olaf Krueger napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
>
That’s my understanding too.
From: Olaf Krueger
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 12:34:00 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to identify object instances (StableObjectId)?
Thanks, Yishay... it really seems that StableObjectId is coming from Chrome
Thanks, Yishay... it really seems that StableObjectId is coming from Chrome.
> You can use an object’s dimensions, className, etc. to make sure it’s the
> one you need.
> I do this all the time to break on specific values.
Just to make sure that I got it right:
What if we create a couple of
+1.
I do this all the time to break on specific values.
> On Feb 12, 2019, at 11:40 AM, Yishay Weiss wrote:
>
> For what it’s worth, I find using conditional breakpoints will get me around
> the need to record instance names most of the time. You can use an object’s
> dimensions, className,
For what it’s worth, I find using conditional breakpoints will get me around
the need to record instance names most of the time. You can use an object’s
dimensions, className, etc. to make sure it’s the one you need.
From: Olaf Krueger
Sent: Monday, February
Krueger
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:52:36 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to identify object instances (StableObjectId)?
Hi,
just for the case of completeness, the StableObjectId looks like this in
VSCode [1].
> ... you can identify an object by the properties it
Hi,
just for the case of completeness, the StableObjectId looks like this in
VSCode [1].
> ... you can identify an object by the properties it has and its parent
IIUIC, this is valid for objects which do not differ.
But if we have (for whatever reason) identical object instances it's hard to
In Intelij debugger there is unique number for each instance. I can see
this during debugging, so maybe it's a matter of support from IDE sight. It
is very helpful when you wanted to compare instance of some object in one
place of app with another place.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019, 10:13 PM Alex Harui
I've never seen that.
For PAYG reasons, fewer objects are assigned ids just in case in Royale.
For debugging, you might be able to call UIDUtil on the objects to assign then
a UID. But often in the debugger you can identify an object by the properties
it has and its parent.
HTH,
-Alex
On
16 matches
Mail list logo
