t;>>>
> >>>>> ** Project **
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * releases: 7
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * number of release managers: 3 (Jia Yu, Paweł Kociński, Kanchan
> >>>> Chowdhury)
> >>>>>
I am sorry, but I am unable to attend.
Will it be recorded?
On Fri, Oct 7, 2022, 05:28 Jia Yu wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> So far, we have 25 responses from the survey. The majority chose (1) Oct
> 22 7 AM Pacific Time = 3 PM London = 11 PM Tokyo and (2) Zoom software for
> the meeting. So let's have
Netanel Malka created SEDONA-134:
Summary: Some Binder contrib notebooks are not working
Key: SEDONA-134
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-134
Project: Apache Sedona
Issue
n.
> >
> > - number of contributors (and growth since incubation)
> > 40
> > Overall: 74
> > 54% of the contributors joined since incubation
> >
> > - email discussions since incubation: 798 threads on
> dev@sedona.apache.org
> >
> > - releases: 5
Netanel Malka created SEDONA-121:
Summary: Add equivalent constructors left over from Spark to Flink
Key: SEDONA-121
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-121
Project: Apache Sedona
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17523892#comment-17523892
]
Netanel Malka commented on SEDONA-92:
-
I tried it, but I still have those issues.
The workaround
+1
Thanks,
Netanel Malka
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 20:40, Mo Sarwat wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:38 AM Jia Yu wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jia
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 22,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17509468#comment-17509468
]
Netanel Malka commented on SEDONA-85:
-
I can help with that.
Do you think we shall create another
Netanel Malka created SEDONA-93:
---
Summary: Add ST_GeomFromGeoJSON to Sedona flink
Key: SEDONA-93
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-93
Project: Apache Sedona
Issue Type: Task
Netanel Malka created SEDONA-92:
---
Summary: Build failed using Intellij IDEA
Key: SEDONA-92
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-92
Project: Apache Sedona
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17504399#comment-17504399
]
Netanel Malka commented on SEDONA-85:
-
[~jiayu]
I am wondering if we can generalize the SQL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17503365#comment-17503365
]
Netanel Malka commented on SEDONA-85:
-
[~imbruced] [~jiayu]
Would we like to add all the functions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-52?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17464953#comment-17464953
]
Netanel Malka commented on SEDONA-52:
-
[~jiayu] , [~imbruced]
Both of the projects are using the MIT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-52?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17456964#comment-17456964
]
Netanel Malka commented on SEDONA-52:
-
[~imbruced]
Are you working on that?
I found those packages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-28?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17456960#comment-17456960
]
Netanel Malka commented on SEDONA-28:
-
[~jiayu] I saw that:
{code:java}
Reverts #516
PR 516
+1
Great work!
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021, 20:13 Adam Binford wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021, 3:00 AM Jia Yu wrote:
>
>> Hi all, This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona 1.1.1-incubating-rc1.
>> Please refer to the changes listed at the bottom of this email. Release
>> notes:
>>
;> > Changes according to the comments on the previous release
>>> > Original comment (Permalink from https://lists.apache.org/list.html):
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcc3252c2afda7761afb205eb00a2f8a5d71256fc7f4d631efc879629%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>>> >
>>> > 1. Fix the header issue in the BSD license
>>> > This has been fixed.
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/sedona-1.1.0-incubating-rc1/zeppelin/index.js
>>> > [2]
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/sedona-1.1.0-incubating-rc1/licenses/LICENSE-zeppelin-helium-plugin
>>> >
>>> > 2. Add the license for scalastyle_config.xml
>>> >
>>> > [3]
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/sedona-1.1.0-incubating-rc1/LICENSE#L210
>>> >
>>> > 3. Replace NASA HDF data with some alternatives to avoid the legal
>>> issue
>>> >
>>> > All NASA data has been removed from the repo.
>>> >
>>>
>>
--
Best regards,
Netanel Malka.
2019-2020,
> > Apache Sedona” in it?
> >
> > The issue has been fixed. The license for zeppelin plugin has been added
> to
> > LICENSE as well.
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/sedona-1.0.1-incubating-rc1/LICENSE
> >
> > 3. Please put instructions on how to build in the release, instructions
> can
> > change over time so pointing to a URL may not be helpful when trying to
> > build older versions.
> >
> > Build instruction has been added to svn/dist/dev
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sedona/1.0.1-incubating-rc1/
> >
>
--
Best regards,
Netanel Malka.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Netanel Malka closed SEDONA-17.
---
Resolution: Won't Do
Will be part of SEDONA-28
> Replace geometry serializer in RDD API with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17310987#comment-17310987
]
Netanel Malka commented on SEDONA-17:
-
Close this issue and open SEDONA-28 as we decided to implement
Netanel Malka created SEDONA-28:
---
Summary: Add WKB serializer in RDD and SQL API and let the user
choose the SerDe
Key: SEDONA-28
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-28
Project: Apache
Netanel Malka created SEDONA-17:
---
Summary: Replace geometry serializer in RDD API with the WKB
serializer
Key: SEDONA-17
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-17
Project: Apache Sedona
wel was working on some improvements for GeoJSON loading. So we can
> > leave it for him.
> >
> > Do you have any other issues you want to work on?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jia
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:35 AM Netanel Malka wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jia,
> >> Are there any features that we want to develop? or fix some bugs?
> >>
> >> My free time now allows me to make some contributions to the project.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>
>
--
Best regards,
Netanel Malka.
Hi Jia,
Are there any features that we want to develop? or fix some bugs?
My free time now allows me to make some contributions to the project.
Thanks,
Hi Gregory,
Can you please try to install the jars on the Databricks Cluster?
For example:
On clusters -> choose your cluster -> libraries -> install new:
1.Coordinates: org.geotools:gt-main:24.0
2.repo: https://repo.osgeo.org/repository/release/
I successfully did it.
Please let me know if
to update the website and let the users
> know how to call it.
>
> Any better ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Jia
>
>
>
--
Best regards,
Netanel Malka.
urrent
> >> release.
> >> >
> >> > For a detailed checklist please refer to:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> >> >
> >> > Changes from the last failed vote (let's call it rc0 :-) ):
> >> > 1. Version changed from "1.0.0-incubator" to "1.0.0-incubating"
> >> > 2. Source code and binary now hosted on dist/dev/incubator/sedona/
> >> > 3. Source code and binary now are signed by RSA-4096 key with
> >> > ji...@apache.org
> >> > 4. Source code and binary now use sha512 checksum
> >> > 5. Binaries are not staged on repository.apache.org yet. I will stage
> >> them
> >> > after the vote passes.
> >> > 6. The compressed source code size changed from 600+ MB to 100+ MB, by
> >> > remove duplicate test data. Will find a way to further in the future
> >> > releases.
> >> > 7. GeoTools (LGPL license, ASF Category X license) binaries have been
> >> > completed removed from Sedona binaries. Users have to compile the
> source
> >> > code by themselves if they want to use ShapefileReader and CRS
> >> > Transformation.
> >> >
> >> > @fengji...@gmail.com Von, the GitHub tag is
> >> called
> >> > "sedona-1.0.0-incubating-rc1" which has "sedona" prefix. This is
> because
> >> > our GitHub tags include old tags for GeoSpark. To differentiate Sedona
> >> tags
> >> > from old tags, I intend to add the "sedona" prefix.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you very much!
> >> > Jia
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
--
Best regards,
Netanel Malka.
Great Job!!
+1
Netanel Malka
On 2021/01/07 10:16:11, Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> After a fruitful discussion about our first Apache Sedona release
> 1.0.0-incubator, the release has been created. This is a call for vote to
> release Apache Sedona (incubating) 1
f you can get it done, I will start a vote
> thread in our community and then pass it to the incubator.
>
> Jia
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 10:38 AM Netanel Malka
> wrote:
>
> > I tried it again with no success.
> > Now, I want to try to remove the .iv2 folder and
and run the three projects in CLI
> and IntelliJ? See
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/master/.github/workflows/example.yml#L35
>
> Thanks,
> Jia
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 1:14 AM Netanel Malka wrote:
>
> > Hi Jia
scroll down to the bottom, you will see the section.
> > >>
> > >> @Felix Cheung Felix, does Pawel need to be
> > >> aware of anything else, besides the incubator PyPi guideline?
> > >>
> > >> Thank you very much!
> > >> Jia
>
Hi Jia,
That's great news!
Happy and healthy New Year to everyone.
They look fine to me.
Do you think it will be worth to use them within a demo project? (to eliminate
dependency issues) I can test it if we need it.
BR,
Netanel Malka,
Big Data Consultant
[Description: Description
Succeeded to push the snapshots.
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 12:04, Netanel Malka wrote:
> Thanks. but unfortunately, it's not working.
> I got the prompt for the PGP passphrase at the release:prepare phase.
>
> It looks like I don't have permission to push to the Sedona
> nexus art
Thanks. but unfortunately, it's not working.
I got the prompt for the PGP passphrase at the release:prepare phase.
It looks like I don't have permission to push to the Sedona
nexus artifactory.
I will try to fix that later.
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 11:55, Jia Yu wrote:
> @Netanel Ma
Hi Jia,
I tried to deploy but I got a 401 Unauthorized error, full error:
https://gist.github.com/netanel246/04c5be423d242a3bb9ef9a300c8817c8
I created a settings.xml file with my apache user and an encrypted
password. I also have a GPG key.
Did you encounter this problem?
Thanks,
Netanel Malka
l be documentation and stage the first release.
> Although I really want to resolve the ST_Transform lock contention issue,
> it requires a new ST_FlipCoordinate which may take a few days. I will see
> whether I can finish this by Christmas but not sure.
>
> @Netanel Malka Could you p
4
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Please feel free to comment if you have any suggestions!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Jia
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 9:51 AM
Hi Jia,
I tried to use the branch sedona-1.0-doc but the artifact for 1.16.2 is not in
the Maven Central so I cannot compile the project.
I got:
The POM for org.locationtech.jts:jts-core:jar:1.16.2 is missing, no dependency
information available
I searched for the artifact here:
What do you mean by compile target?
?
Iv'e found Apache Zeppelin handle multiple Spark versions here using profile
for each Spark version:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/spark/pom.xml#L185
Do you think this method is better?
Netanel Malka,
Big Data Consultant
[Description
xpect another
maintenance release in the first half of 2021 at least. I'd also guess it
wouldn't be maintained by 2022."
?BR,
Netanel Malka,
Big Data Consultant
[Description: Description: Description: Description:
cid:image001.jpg@01C85203.36A2AF30]
From: Pawe
pe to create a PR soon for adjusting the build to deploy to the ASF
Nexus repository
* The key that signs the artifacts were created and tested.
Do we want to create a candidate release for the current master branch?
Netanel Malka,
Big Data Consultant
[Description: Description: Description:
th that name? (Also for
the *release*)
3. Do we need to push the artifacts also to ASF Nexus Repository (beside
Maven Central)?
Thanks.
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 19:21, Netanel Malka wrote:
> Thanks Felix.
>
> I would be delighted to help.
> I can start with the GPG.
> Can I
, 2020 at 10:08 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > We will be working on the first Sedona. Please see the JIRA ticket
> here:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SEDONA/issues/SEDONA-3?filter=allopenissues
> > >
> > > Do you think there are any outstanding issues to be fixed as well?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jia
> > >
> >
>
--
Best regards,
Netanel Malka.
Hi Jia,
I saw that you merge the PR about make Sedona depend on JTS.
Did you also try to open a PR in the JTS project?
I wondered if they agreed to accept your changes.
BR,
Netanel Malka.
>>>> GitHub repo (https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona). But one
>>>> committer (Masha from Facebook) who made thousands of lines of contribution
>>>> to GeoSpark still didn't submit her CLA. The entire process is currently
>>>> blocked by this.
>>>>
>>>> Mohamed and I have been trying to reach her a couple of times in the
>>>> past 3 weeks but got no reply. I have asked the champion about how we can
>>>> proceed in this case. Let's see what will happen.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 9:06 AM Paweł Kociński <
>>>> pawel93kocin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jia,
>>>>> Do we know when the first release of Apache Sedona will occur ? Can I
>>>>> help with something to make it happen? I have few ideas and some code
>>>>> which
>>>>> will be useful in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Pawel
>>>>>
>>>>
--
Best regards,
Netanel Malka.
Sedona-dev
>>>>
>>>> I think reflection would be a neat solution but it may bring
>>>> technical debt in the future and cause problems to the python API.
>>>>
>>>> In the long run, a wrapper around JTS geometry would be a better
>>&g
46 matches
Mail list logo
