Re: Review Request 61973: SENTRY-1888: Sentry might not fetch all HMS duplicated events IDs when requested

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61973/#review184333 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alexander Kolbasov On Aug. 31, 2017,

Draft of the quarterly ASF report for Apache Sentry

Here is the draft of the quarterly Apache Sentry ASF report. Please let me know if you have any comments or issues with it. Thanks, - Alex. ## Description: Apache Sentry is a highly modular system for providing fine grained role based authorization to both data and metadata stored on an Apache

Re: Review Request 61863: SENTRY-1896 - Optimize retrieving roles for groups

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61863/ --- (Updated Aug. 31, 2017, 9:55 p.m.) Review request for sentry, Alexander

Re: [DISCUSSION] Move to JDK8 and Datanucleus 4

+1 On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Sergio Pena wrote: > Thanks Sasha, > > I will create another thread for the JDK8 features discussion then. For > this thread, the JDK8 support as the minimum version for compilation > (without Java8 features) + datanucleus4 is

[DISCUSS] Allow JDK8 specific features on Sentry 2.0

Hi All, This thread discussion is a follow-up to the old thread related to supporting JDK8 and Datanucleus 4 as the minimum version for Sentry 2.0. This is dedicated to discuss whether we should allow using JDK8 specific features (such as lambda functions and other useful API) in Sentry.

Re: Review Request 62007: SENTRY-1909 Improvements for memory usage when full path snapshot is sent from Sentry to NN

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62007/#review184312 --- Ship it! As we just discussed, the ideal solution to this

Re: [DISCUSSION] Move to JDK8 and Datanucleus 4

Thanks Sasha, I will create another thread for the JDK8 features discussion then. For this thread, the JDK8 support as the minimum version for compilation (without Java8 features) + datanucleus4 is approved then. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: >

Sentry-jdk-1.7-v2 - Build # 132 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Sentry-jdk-1.7-v2 (build #132) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Sentry-jdk-1.7-v2/132/ to view the results.

Re: Review Request 61973: SENTRY-1888: Sentry might not fetch all HMS duplicated events IDs when requested

> On Aug. 31, 2017, 12:25 a.m., Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/HMSFollower.java > > Line 247 (original), 251 (patched) > > > > > >

Re: Review Request 61793: SENTRY-1894: Update field size in package.jdo for dataNucleus to match size in sql

> On Aug. 28, 2017, 5:03 p.m., Vamsee Yarlagadda wrote: > > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/model/package.jdo > > Line 135 (original), 126 (patched) > > > > > >

Sentry-jdk-1.7-v2 - Build # 131 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Sentry-jdk-1.7-v2 (build #131) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Sentry-jdk-1.7-v2/131/ to view the results.

Re: Review Request 62007: SENTRY-1909 Improvements for memory usage when full path snapshot is sent from Sentry to NN

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62007/ --- (Updated Aug. 31, 2017, 6:54 a.m.) Review request for sentry, Arjun Mishra,

Re: Review Request 62007: SENTRY-1909 Improvements for memory usage when full path snapshot is sent from Sentry to NN

> On Aug. 31, 2017, 6:28 a.m., Misha Dmitriev wrote: > > In general I wonder whether instead of the old Set<> we should now use > > Collection<> rather than the more explicit List<>. I think using a > > supertype like Collection<> makes sense only if it's used for a method > > parameter that

Re: Review Request 62007: SENTRY-1909 Improvements for memory usage when full path snapshot is sent from Sentry to NN

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62007/#review184238 --- In general I wonder whether instead of the old Set<> we should