Re: Review Request 63415: SENTRY-2012 Make SentryShellGeneric extendible

2017-11-17 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63415/#review191314 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Colm O hEigeartaigh On Nov. 16, 2017,

Re: Review Request 63415: SENTRY-2012 Make SentryShellGeneric extendible

2017-11-16 Thread Mano Kovacs via Review Board
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63415/ --- (Updated Nov. 16, 2017, 6:40 p.m.) Review request for sentry and Colm O

Re: Review Request 63415: SENTRY-2012 Make SentryShellGeneric extendible

2017-11-16 Thread Mano Kovacs via Review Board
> On Nov. 10, 2017, 10:35 a.m., Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > Minor issues: > > > > a) Make sure there is a space before an opening bracket, e.g.: > > > > SentryShellGeneric: protected String getServiceNameGeneric(Configuration > > conf){ > > > > protected String

Re: Review Request 63415: SENTRY-2012 Make SentryShellGeneric extendible

2017-11-10 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63415/#review190689 --- Minor issues: a) Make sure there is a space before an opening

Re: Review Request 63415: SENTRY-2012 Make SentryShellGeneric extendible

2017-11-09 Thread Mano Kovacs via Review Board
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63415/ --- (Updated Nov. 9, 2017, 3:32 p.m.) Review request for sentry and Colm O

Re: Review Request 63415: SENTRY-2012 Make SentryShellGeneric extendible

2017-11-08 Thread Alexander Kolbasov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63415/#review190501 --- Overall looks good, some style nits/comments. Colm is also poking

Re: Review Request 63415: SENTRY-2012 Make SentryShellGeneric extendible

2017-10-31 Thread Mano Kovacs via Review Board
> On Oct. 30, 2017, 10:40 p.m., Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > > This isn't a full review - just looked at some of the changes - probably > > comments apply in other files as well. > > > > The biggest concern - please stay away from Java8-specific features. > > Although there is decision to move

Re: Review Request 63415: SENTRY-2012 Make SentryShellGeneric extendible

2017-10-31 Thread Mano Kovacs via Review Board
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63415/ --- (Updated Oct. 31, 2017, 2:20 p.m.) Review request for sentry and Colm O

Re: Review Request 63415: SENTRY-2012 Make SentryShellGeneric extendible

2017-10-30 Thread Alexander Kolbasov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63415/#review189652 --- This isn't a full review - just looked at some of the changes -

Review Request 63415: SENTRY-2012 Make SentryShellGeneric extendible

2017-10-30 Thread Mano Kovacs via Review Board
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63415/ --- Review request for sentry and Colm O hEigeartaigh. Bugs: SENTRY-2012