Re: Client Side Javascript JSF

Super :-) Later on I'll be finishing up an EMF model, along with some JET templates, so that both server and client components, etc. be generated at from the same source. I'll be glad to donate these as well. I think it will greatly speed up the development cycle, especially with respect to upda

Re: Client Side Javascript JSF

On 2/14/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I noticed (Through commons validator JIRAs) that Shale is using Javascript validation. I donated a Javascript Framework written on top of dojo to myfaces a while back, in case anyone is interested. It has the ability to hook javascript val

Re: Client Side Javascript JSF

The library is completely separate from myfaces as it was built. My original motivation can be seen here: http://trac.dojotoolkit.org/ticket/1378 So the page would first download the viewhandler, and use it to parse the tags. Components could also be added via pure javascript of coarse, if someo

Re: Client Side Javascript JSF

On 2/14/07, Hermod Opstvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi If it's part of MyFaces then I think we can also use it in Clay hence Shale. We already use some of the Ajax stuff there. That'll be true if it is a separate artifact ... Shale and Clay need to work with the RI too :-) Hermod Craig

Re: SV: Clay tutorial

I'll be glad to review that as well - either in English or Norwegian :-) --- Hermod Opstvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > OK, It contains quite a bit of images and I don't > know how the Shale Wiki > handles these. The Wiki we are using is a TWiki > wiki. > > Hermod > > > -Opprinn

Re: SV: Client Side Javascript JSF

Hi (Heisan), I'm not sure if myfaces has gotten around to integrating it yet. I'll be glad to help if anyone is interested. It has a client side ViewHandler for rendering JSF components that support multiple component namespaces, i.e. dojo, myfaces, somecompany, etc. The ViewHandler hooks up th

Re: Clay tutorial

On 2/14/07, Hermod Opstvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi OK, It contains quite a bit of images and I don't know how the Shale Wiki handles these. The Wiki we are using is a TWiki wiki. See MoinMoin help on linking and inline attachments for images: http://wiki.apache.org/shale/HelpOnLinki

SV: Client Side Javascript JSF

Hi If it's part of MyFaces then I think we can also use it in Clay hence Shale. We already use some of the Ajax stuff there. Hermod -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: Ole Ersoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 14. februar 2007 21:29 Til: dev@shale.apache.org Emne: Client Side Javascript JSF H

SV: Clay tutorial

Hi OK, It contains quite a bit of images and I don't know how the Shale Wiki handles these. The Wiki we are using is a TWiki wiki. Hermod -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Craig McClanahan Sendt: 14. februar 2007 20:29 Til: dev@shale.apac

Re: Clay tutorial

>From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 2/14/07, Hermod Opstvedt wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Recently I've been writing a rather detailed tutorial on using Clay on our > > company's Wiki. It's currently in Norwegian, but if there is an interest > > in > > it I would be willing to

Re: Fwd: shale-validator.jar and commons-validator.jar both contains different validateUtilities.js

>From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > FYI > Besides the missing trim function, the shale version of this script file overrides the "jcv_retrieveFormName" function. The form name is used to formulate the callback functions. JSF adds the colon ":" character as a namspace delimiter

Re: Fwd: shale-validator.jar and commons-validator.jar both contains different validateUtilities.js

Thanks Niall, I sent the JSF javascript library to Shale dev as well. It would be great to see all this stuff aligned with Shale JS components having a dependency on commons-proper JS libraries. --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI > > -- Forwarded message -- >

Fwd: shale-validator.jar and commons-validator.jar both contains different validateUtilities.js

FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Feb 14, 2007 8:48 PM Subject: Re: shale-validator.jar and commons-validator.jar both contains different validateUtilities.js To: Jakarta Commons Users List On 2/14/07, Hasan Turksoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Client Side Javascript JSF

Hi, I noticed (Through commons validator JIRAs) that Shale is using Javascript validation. I donated a Javascript Framework written on top of dojo to myfaces a while back, in case anyone is interested. It has the ability to hook javascript validators to client side javascript components, among

Re: Clay tutorial

On 2/14/07, Hermod Opstvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Recently I've been writing a rather detailed tutorial on using Clay on our company's Wiki. It's currently in Norwegian, but if there is an interest in it I would be willing to translate it to English and we could either add it to the Sha

SV: Update to Tld2ClayCfg

Hi My suggestion for the added mapping goes for the Maven build. This means that when you build Clay, the correct configuration file information is build and you don't have to handtweak it afterwards. There would be some minimal maintenance of that list when something new is added though. Hermod

Clay tutorial

Hi Recently I've been writing a rather detailed tutorial on using Clay on our company's Wiki. It's currently in Norwegian, but if there is an interest in it I would be willing to translate it to English and we could either add it to the Shake Wiki or I could submit it as a .pdf document. Would any

RE: Update to Tld2ClayCfg

>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi > > So should we leave the Tld2ClayCfg as it is now (with the latest patch) ? It > outputs al the required components, but lacks the information that we can't > get > from the ld or by introspecting the tags. > I think we should stick with components. Th