RE: Shale 1.05

So, I see that the download link on the Shale home page actually points to 1.05, so that part is at least complete :-). I think the site and maven artifacts still need to be pushed out, though... ~~~ Kito D. Mann -- Author

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Shale PMC Chair

Excellent news. Congrats, Gary! ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info phone: +1

RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces

Right now, you should continue to use the Shale user's mailing list. The MyFaces merger hasn't happened yet. ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training

RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces

That's a very good idea.. -Original Message- From: Paul Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 10:27 AM To: dev@shale.apache.org Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces I use the Testing framework. So does Tomahawk. I suggest creating a release based

RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces

-M On 10/22/07, Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think that's a good idea, since JSF 2.0 is a year or more away ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF

RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces

maintaining a similar code base... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Kito D. Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 17:49 An: dev@shale.apache.org Betreff: RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces I don't think that's a good idea, since JSF 2.0 is a year

RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces

For the record, Tiles does come up in conversation with shops that require use of JSP. ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http

RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces

-Original Message- From: Pavel Savara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:15 PM To: dev@shale.apache.org Subject: RE: Merging Shale into MyFaces but I'm having a hard time seeing benefits over Facelets and Clay. What I see as benefit for tiles is

RE: MyFaces

languages (such as Ruby or Groovy) on the JVM. It seems to me that might be more of a logical focus. ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http

RE: MyFaces

. ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info

[ANNOUNCE] Recent JSFCentral articles

for Apache's Shale project, talks about JSF, Shale, development tools, and dynamic languages. == JBoss: The JavaServer Faces Powerhouse? (http://www.jsfcentral.com/editorial/jboss_powerhouse.html) JSFCentral editor-in-chief Kito D. Mann discusses JBoss and their involvement in the JavaServer Faces

RE: Determining the flavor of the JSF runtime

Good suggestions, Gary :-). I just captured them. ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info * Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter! http://oi.vresp.com

RE: Determining the flavor of the JSF runtime

This definitely sounds like a good candidate for being part of the spec... I'll push that one onto the agenda whenever they officially start the EG... ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.JSFCentral.com

RE: [OT] Google Code Search

... ~~~ Kito D. Mann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info -Original Message- From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

calling authors

Hello, I'm currently looking for people who are interested in writing great articles for JSF Central about MyFaces, Tomahawk, Tobago, Trinidad, or Shale. If you're interested, please reply! ~~~ Kito D. Mann ([EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Shale home page

in a different category. There has been talk of building a JSR-299 implementation when the time is right. I don't know if the category really changes. To me, that's just one more layer... ~~~ Kito D. Mann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Author, JavaServer

RE: Shale home page

~~~ Kito D. Mann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info

RE: Confluence Wiki Anyone?

+1 I agree that it's pretty superior, and I love the idea of being able to easily contribute docs. ~~~ Kito D. Mann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training

RE: Confluence Wiki Anyone?

about some projects; a big problem is lack of documentation, but it's not easy for members of the user community to add documentation. ~~~ Kito D. Mann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF

RE: JSR-299 (Web Beans) Implementation In Shale?

have any (real or imagined) ties to the JEMS product line. P.S. I've been pretty quiet on this list, but I do follow Shale and provide training for it. ~~~ Kito D. Mann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http