Hi,
I'm curious to know what people think about some of the idioms in the JS
code you find in shindig. There's an awful lot of stuff like this:
shindig.foo = function(){
//...
var myFunction = function() {
}
return {'foo': myFunction,
'bar': function() {
re
+1
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose that Ryan Baxter be granted committer access
> to Shindig along with PMC membership.
>
> Ryan has been instrumental in moving OpenSocial v2 forward and implementing
> these new features in Shindig.
>
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1190/#review1183
---
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/content/samplecontainer
Sorry Derek, I thought you were using trunk. The common container was not
introduced until after 2.0, so it shouldn't be causing the error.
-Ryan
Email: rjbax...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 978-899-3041
developerWorks Profile
From: Derek Houghton
To: dev@shindig.apache.org,
Date: 07/25/2011
Ryan,
I've been working on version 2.0.0 for a while.
suddenly started getting the samplecontainer errors.
would the deprecation of shindig-container.js cause this?
Derek
On 25 Jul 2011, at 19:57, Ryan J Baxter wrote:
> Derek, not sure if you are just starting out with your container
> implem
If you want the user pref to be persisted in the database you need to
implement the server handler for it.
I remember Doug Davies has tried to add persistent layer for user
pref. Maybe he could share his progress.
Including him in the email.
- Henry
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Mat Schaffer
Trying to port my database from version 2.0.0 to trunk.
Now when I try and set up the basic database connection in the trunk I
immediately get the following errors.
I'm sure its a duplicate dependency but I can't see it.
I thought that I needed both the social api
shindig-common and the samples
So with some research it looks like I'm supposed to be implementing my own
server module. Is that pretty much accurate?
Again, any advice or RTFMs (with a link to the respective FMs) is
appreciated.
Thanks,
Mat
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Mat Schaffer wrote:
> So I noticed that UserPref
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1190/
---
Review request for shindig and Ryan Baxter.
Summary
---
1. Update implemen
Hi,
Could you move this review to https://reviews.apache.org?
- Henry
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
> Reviewers: rbaxter85, dev_shindig.apache.org,
>
> Description:
> 1. Update implementation of gadgets.window.getContainerDimensions based
> on latest API which will call the callback
Reviewers: rbaxter85, dev_shindig.apache.org,
Description:
1. Update implementation of gadgets.window.getContainerDimensions based
on latest API which will call the callback function with the dimension
object as parameter.
2. correct the feature docs.
Please review this at http://codereview.apps
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1179/#review1178
---
almost there!
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features
Derek, not sure if you are just starting out with your container
implementation or if you are working on an existing container, but
shindig-container.js is being "deprecated" in favor of a more standardized
container called the common container. You can find samples using the
common container
Dan,
long time in replying as I got a little confused here.
I thought that the opt_params in the samplecontainer.js was what was getting
passed to the core:rpc:pubsub:shindig-container.js. but when the error occurs
my debug call in the samplecontainer.js is not called.
I am unclear as to how to
A big +1 from me.
- Eric W.
15 matches
Mail list logo
