Doug can you explain more about how your using appdata + site id to store
user prefs? I tried looking below but couldn't find an explanation. I
realize that every gadget site has a unique gadget id, but couldn't a
container choose to reuse a gadget site? Say a container renders gadget 1
in site
Hey John,
I hadn’t seen the exportJs support before (I haven’t done any work with
features in a long time) -- that does look very similar! (and as an aside --
hats off to whoever came up with that scheme to be able to closure compile JS
in isolation but still have fully qualified symbols
In our implementation the siteid SHOULD be unique and specific to an
instance of a gadget (I¹m still working out the details on this). So they
won¹t be reused. That still means appdata could be queried and user
preferences visible to others. However I¹m working off this comment...
Hi everyone,
Is anyone else seeing this failure when building against Trunk? It might
be related to some recent changes to ExportJsProcessor.java.
Thanks,
-Stanton
Failed tests:
testProcessWithOneNonEmptyFeatureDeferred
(org.apache.shindig.gadgets.js.DeferredExportJsProcessorTest):
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1224/
---
Review request for shindig, johnfargo and Ziv Horesh.
Summary
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1224/#review1231
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1224/#review1232
---
Is there requirement or scenario where these need to be exposed as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1225/
---
Review request for shindig and Ziv Horesh.
Summary
---
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1225/#review1233
---
Ship it!
- Ziv
On 2011-07-29 22:23:13, johnfargo wrote:
Thanks for the reply John. Just want to make sure we add customization
point to Shindig as necessary =)
- Henry
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:36 PM, John Hjelmstad fa...@google.com wrote:
For various reasons, we happen to use different global symbol names in our
use of the config lib. That in turn
Agreed, well worth asking.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for the reply John. Just want to make sure we add customization
point to Shindig as necessary =)
- Henry
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:36 PM, John Hjelmstad fa...@google.com wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1224/#review1234
---
Ship it!
Just connect with John with email. LGTM (with changes to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1224/#review1235
---
Committed as r1152402.
- johnfargo
On 2011-07-30 00:12:24, csong
As someone pointed out earlier in the thread, Mark Weitzel, was looking
into cleaning up app data and user prefs. This did not make it into
OpenSocial 2.0 but I think Mark wants to pick it back up in OpenSocial
Next. I think it's a fair assumption that the APIs around app data and
user prefs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1224/
---
(Updated 2011-07-30 00:12:24.555729)
Review request for shindig, johnfargo and
Which JVM?
Tests are passing on Jenkins:
http://hudson.inuus.com/job/Shindig%20Java%201.5/
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Stanton Sievers ssiev...@us.ibm.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
Is anybody else seeing this error when building the Java5 profile? I
built the Java5 profile a few weeks ago
Hey all, quick FYI: I just svn up'd my shindig dir and rebuilt and started
experimenting with the
various examples, only to find that nothing seems to be working at the
moment. Here's a quick list of the things that are
flaking out:
for /container/sample1.html
Error: window.___jsl is
17 matches
Mail list logo
