An initial patch is available that CMIS Documents & Folders in Apache Shindig.
JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1676
JIRA review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3192/
API documentation and setup instructions:
http://docs.opensocial.org/display/OSD/CMIS+Use+Cases+and+Posit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3192/
---
Review request for shindig.
Summary
---
Initial patch to support CMIS Docum
+1
Ian
dito what JohnH said :)
2011/12/14 ๏̯͡๏ Jasvir Nagra :
> Oh snap! ;)
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
>
>> John, you've been active much more recently than some :)
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM, John Hjelmstad wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Though by
Oh snap! ;)
+1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> John, you've been active much more recently than some :)
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM, John Hjelmstad wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Though by writing this +1, does that mean my 2 years are refreshed? :)
> >
> > On Tue, De
John, you've been active much more recently than some :)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM, John Hjelmstad wrote:
> +1
>
> Though by writing this +1, does that mean my 2 years are refreshed? :)
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Bastian Hofmann
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at
Li. Thanks again for committing my changes. This is gonna really help our
implementation. Do I need to close out the review and jira?
doug
On 12/12/11 3:10 PM, "Li Xu" wrote:
> ah, I see, no worry. I can clean up the code style when committing it.
> thanks.
Thanks. I've come to the same conclusion. That OAuth2Accessor needs to be
persisted. When I stubbed out a NoOp OAuth2Cache the redirect_uri servlet
request failed because it's trying to map a 'state' variable back to
accessor. Ah, I keep finding fun stuff to implement.
doug
On 12/13/11 11:58
+1
Though by writing this +1, does that mean my 2 years are refreshed? :)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Bastian Hofmann
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Ciancetta, Jesse E.
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Paul Lindner [mailto:lind...@inuus.com]
>
Doug,
Both in-memory and non-caching options could be acceptable. You could even
provide your own OAuth2Store implementation that doesn't even use the
OAuth2Persistence and OAuth2Cache interfaces. It's not really possible to
make a recommendation without knowing all the variables in your product
A Noop cache impl should be easy to implement and is a common idiom.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:30 AM, daviesd wrote:
> I understand that OAuth2Cache provides a mechanism for implementing a cache
> that the OAuth2Store uses to limit requests to the OAuth2Persister.
> However, if my OAuth2Persiste
Looks like the phpunit tests are not working since the refactor. I'm a bit
pressed for time, but may be able to look at it later this week.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Shindig Hudson
Date: Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:34 AM
Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Shindig Trunk #828
To: lin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3165/
---
Review request for shindig.
Summary
---
As we start to build (and promote t
+1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Ciancetta, Jesse E. wrote:
> +1
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Paul Lindner [mailto:lind...@inuus.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 9:27 AM
>>To: dev@shindig.apache.org
>>Subject: Emeritus status for inactive members
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'd like to sug
I understand that OAuth2Cache provides a mechanism for implementing a cache
that the OAuth2Store uses to limit requests to the OAuth2Persister.
However, if my OAuth2Persister implementation uses JPA or some other
persistence model that already has caching built-in, the OAuth2Cache is
redundant and
+1
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul Lindner [mailto:lind...@inuus.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 9:27 AM
>To: dev@shindig.apache.org
>Subject: Emeritus status for inactive members
>
>Hi,
>
>I'd like to suggest that people >2y inactive on Shindig move to Emeritus
>status.
>
>--
>Pau
+1
From: Ryan J Baxter/Westford/IBM@Lotus
To: dev@shindig.apache.org,
Date: 12/13/2011 09:37 AM
Subject:Re: Emeritus status for inactive members
+1
-Ryan
Email: rjbax...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 978-899-3041
developerWorks Profile
From: Paul Lindner
To: dev@shindig.apach
+1
-Ryan
Email: rjbax...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 978-899-3041
developerWorks Profile
From: Paul Lindner
To: dev@shindig.apache.org,
Date: 12/13/2011 09:26 AM
Subject:Emeritus status for inactive members
Hi,
I'd like to suggest that people >2y inactive on Shindig move to Emerit
Hi,
I'd like to suggest that people >2y inactive on Shindig move to Emeritus
status.
--
Paul Lindner -- lind...@inuus.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
If no one opposes I will commit later today, and be happy to rollback
afterwards if it causes anyone trouble.
--
Paul Lindner -- lind...@inuus.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3053/#review3877
---
Thanks all for the reviews.
I plan on committing this on Wednesday, s
20 matches
Mail list logo
