Maybe it makes sense to use semantic versioning, as described here:
http://semver.org/
If indeed the specs are major.minor then you can implement with
major.minor.patch
Greetings, Marcel
On Aug 7, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> FWIW an approach to version numbers I have seen a
you are
> doing that is all. If you have one handy that is not confidential it would
> help.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Marcel Offermans <
> marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote:
>
>> We are working with the latest release, but by looking at trunk I th
ed the problem?
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Marcel Offermans <
> marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote:
>
>> We ran into an issue today where we had multiple JS includes that were
>> converted into one big JS file by the ConcatProxyServlet that basicall
We ran into an issue today where we had multiple JS includes that were
converted into one big JS file by the ConcatProxyServlet that basically seems
to just (as the name implies) concaternate multiple JS files into one. That is
fine in principle, but it seems that some of the original minified f
Judging from the comment that there will probably be a "data liberation policy"
my interpretation is that Google is dropping OpenSocial completely, and not
migrating it to for example Google+.
Conceptually, being able to have widgets that run together on a dashboard and
have well defined APIs t
ail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 3:10 AM
>>>>> To: dev@shindig.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: Releases?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to upload the missing Shindig releases to ASF dist folder.
>>>>>
On Apr 25, 2012, at 19:52 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 04:37 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
>> To follow up on this, the releases are still not in the right location.
>> Surely someone can just put them there manually and fix the release
>> procedure for the next one?!
in transitioning of contributions from the old guards of committers to
> new ones so some bumpy experience may be in order.
Thanks for your efforts, that's definitely appreciated.
Greetings, Marcel
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Marcel Offermans
> wr
oping Paul or one of the other committers more familiar
> with the releases can comment on why that is not happening.
>
>
> -Ryan
>
>
>
>
> From: Marcel Offermans
> To: ,
> Date: 04/19/2012 09:41 AM
> Subject:Re: Releases?
>
&g
Since the site is in SVN I would say: commit often :)
On Apr 24, 2012, at 2:36 , Ryan J Baxter wrote:
> Henry how do you think we should handle tracking who is working on which
> portion of the site? JIRA? I just don't want us to be stepping on each
> other toes.
>
> I would love to have it
+1 (non binding) to Move the PHP part to Apache Shindig attic.
Greetings, Marcel
Hello Ryan,
On Apr 19, 2012, at 15:44 , Ryan J Baxter wrote:
> Understood. I am hoping Paul or one of the other committers more familiar
> with the releases can comment on why that is not happening.
I'm not familiar with your release process, but you're probably using Maven.
Within the Felix
c/org/apache/shindig/shindig-server/
>
> -Ryan
>
>
>
>
> From: Marcel Offermans
> To: dev@shindig.apache.org,
> Date: 04/19/2012 02:30 AM
> Subject:Releases?
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> After reading up on the website and mailing
Hello all,
After reading up on the website and mailing list, I got a bit confused about
the releases that you've made. On the one hand, the latest release you mention
on your website is 2.0.0 [1], on the other hand on the list I've seen votes
(that have passed) for at least a couple of newer re
14 matches
Mail list logo
