I figured the easiest way to discuss this was over code so I checked
in the EventLogger classes. If it is OK I'll add documentation for it.
Otherwise the classes can easily be reverted.
Ralph
On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Feb 24, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I figured the easiest way to discuss this was over code so I checked in
the EventLogger classes. If it is OK I'll add documentation for it.
Otherwise the classes can easily be reverted.
Ralph
Hello all,
What is the current status on EventLogger and EventData classes? Th
On Apr 16, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I figured the easiest way to discuss this was over code so I
checked in the EventLogger classes. If it is OK I'll add
documentation for it. Otherwise the classes can easily be reverted.
Ralph
Hello all,
What is the curr
On Apr 16, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Apr 16, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I figured the easiest way to discuss this was over code so I
checked in the EventLogger classes. If it is OK I'll add
documentation for it. Otherwise the classes can easily
Ralph Goers wrote:
Also, As that message says I added the documentation for the two
classes. The email you quoted was from almost 2 months ago. I had
expected to get feedback on this long before this and had come to the
conclusion that there was no objection.
The code was committed for the
On Apr 23, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Also, As that message says I added the documentation for the two
classes. The email you quoted was from almost 2 months ago. I had
expected to get feedback on this long before this and had come to
the conclusion that ther
