On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 20:34 +0100, David Bosschaert wrote:
> I've created the wiki page to list actions take:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Removal+of+problematic+language
>
> Best regards,
Thanks, David.
I've added some information to the wiki page based, including
refe
I've created the wiki page to list actions take:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Removal+of+problematic+language
Best regards,
David
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 17:14, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 17:10 +0100, David Bosschaert wrote:
> > I just tried to create a
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 17:10 +0100, David Bosschaert wrote:
> I just tried to create a wiki page where we can collaborate on this,
> but
> found out that I have no rights to create a page on the SLING wiki...
Hm. Can you please ask Infra? Permissions are managed via groups, which
(I think) are sync
I just tried to create a wiki page where we can collaborate on this, but
found out that I have no rights to create a page on the SLING wiki...
Best regards,
David
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 16:37, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:30 PM Robert Munteanu
> wrote:
> > ...Let's p
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:30 PM Robert Munteanu wrote:
> ...Let's please start by collecting all the required changes in a wiki
> page and seeing whether we have consensus on the change and whether we
> think it has a positive impact for the project...
Big +1 to this, thank you Robert for spellin
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 12:22 +0100, David Bosschaert wrote:
> And I agree with Robert that it would be good to look inside the code
> as
> well.
All changes have pros and cons. Let's please make sure that changing
the default git remote name is not a net negative due to the effort it
includes:
-
Hi David,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 1:22 PM David Bosschaert
wrote:
> ...I think it would be worthwhile to remove any potential problematic
> language...
As mentioned I am not opposed if others want to do the work.
All the work - because renaming things often has subtle unwanted effects.
> I don
Hi all,
I think it would be worthwhile to remove any potential problematic
language. I don't think Java has been identified as being problematic.
And I agree with Robert that it would be good to look inside the code as
well.
Best regards,
David
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 10:14, Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:00 AM Nicolas Peltier wrote:
>
> i guess we would need opinions of people that are on the wrong side of the
> domination..
I see what you mean but I'm not sure if anyone is dominated by Git
master branches...that's my point ;-)
Let me just quote https://en.wikipedia.or
i guess we would need opinions of people that are on the wrong side of the
domination
Le lun. 15 juin 2020 à 10:29, Bertrand Delacretaz
a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM wrote:
> > ...What would others think about renaming the 'master' branches to
> 'main' in
> > Sling?..
>
>
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:58 AM wrote:
> ...What would others think about renaming the 'master' branches to 'main' in
> Sling?..
I don't think it's useful.
I know it is related to the "master/slave is a bad concept" discussion
but I fail to see how "master" by itself is a problem.
There's
On Sat, 2020-06-13 at 09:57 +0100, dav...@apache.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What would others think about renaming the 'master' branches to
> 'main' in
> Sling?
>
> I know that there is discussion going on at members@ where people
> think
> that 'master' on its own is not problematic, with suggesti
I found that page as well and tried it on one of my personal repos on
github. It works and was pretty easy.
The only not easily scripted thing for github is the selection of the
default branch. I'm not sure how the default branch could be changed for
Apache repos. Maybe it needs help from infra?
I
Some instructions for renaming can be found here.
https://www.hanselman.com/blog/EasilyRenameYourGitDefaultBranchFromMasterToMain.aspx
It's relatively easy
Regards
Carsten
Am 14.06.2020 um 17:10 schrieb Konrad Windszus:
+1 as well.
For the default branch we need infra.
PRs targeting master ar
+1 as well.
For the default branch we need infra.
PRs targeting master are automatically closed once master is removed, so we
first need to script retargeting all open PR towards the new 'main' branch
before deleting the old 'master'.
Konrad
> On 14. Jun 2020, at 16:49, Daniel Klco wrote:
>
>
+1
Will we need Infra support to change the default branch in Github?
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020, 10:37 AM Justin Edelson
wrote:
> +1
>
> Regardless of the members@ discussion, we should do this. Although perhaps
> this should be done as a formal vote.
>
> I'm assuming this is something that can be r
+1
Regardless of the members@ discussion, we should do this. Although perhaps
this should be done as a formal vote.
I'm assuming this is something that can be relatively easily scripted, but
if does require manual work, I'd be happy to help.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 4:38 AM wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
Hi all,
It seems that the members@ discussion is moving in this direction now as
well...
Best,
David
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 09:57, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What would others think about renaming the 'master' branches to 'main' in
> Sling?
>
> I know that there is discussion going on at members@ w
Hi all,
What would others think about renaming the 'master' branches to 'main' in
Sling?
I know that there is discussion going on at members@ where people think
that 'master' on its own is not problematic, with suggestions to document
this somewhere. This could be an alternative.
However I person
19 matches
Mail list logo
