On 11 Jan 2010, at 07:52, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
On 09.01.2010 11:48, Ian Boston wrote:
Ok, so I was slow on the uptake, as usual, I now see the problems and I
agree, the pooling should be removed.
Ok, shall I move on then ? Or should I wait for the full consequences
with
Hi,
On 11.01.2010 09:38, Ian Boston wrote:
On 11 Jan 2010, at 07:52, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
On 09.01.2010 11:48, Ian Boston wrote:
Ok, so I was slow on the uptake, as usual, I now see the problems and I
agree, the pooling should be removed.
Ok, shall I move on then ? Or should
I have created SLING-1283 to track this removal.
Regards
Felix
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1283
On 06.01.2010 23:11, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi all,
Today I stumbled upon a potential problem with the JCR Session Pooling
we have in the JCR Base bundle.
Some time ago,
Hi,
On 09.01.2010 11:48, Ian Boston wrote:
Ok, so I was slow on the uptake, as usual, I now see the problems and I
agree, the pooling should be removed.
Ok, shall I move on then ? Or should I wait for the full consequences
with respect to ACL caching (see below) are known ?
Just for the
+1 for removal
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Hi,
You are correctly noting these potential issues.
But for a long time now, Jackrabbit has dramatically grown in this area:
* The compiled ACLs are not cached within the session but in an
ACL cache (where they IMHO belong)
* Session setup once was a very heavy-weight operation (due to
On 7 Jan 2010, at 09:22, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
You are correctly noting these potential issues.
But for a long time now, Jackrabbit has dramatically grown in this area:
* The compiled ACLs are not cached within the session but in an
ACL cache (where they IMHO belong)
Hi all,
Today I stumbled upon a potential problem with the JCR Session Pooling
we have in the JCR Base bundle.
Some time ago, we disabled session pooling by default. Only today I
actually set this default for the Embedded Jackrabbit bundle (see
SLING-1272).
The problems with session pooling are
+1
Session pooling is part of Jackrabbit 2 (which is where it belongs)
anyway. IIRC, you removed it in your JR 2 branch.
On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Today I stumbled upon a potential problem with the JCR Session Pooling
we have in the
Hi,
On 06.01.2010 23:20, Justin Edelson wrote:
+1
Session pooling is part of Jackrabbit 2 (which is where it belongs)
anyway. IIRC, you removed it in your JR 2 branch.
I actually removed it in that branch exactly for the reasons outlined
below ;-)
Regards
Felix
On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:11
On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On 06.01.2010 23:20, Justin Edelson wrote:
+1
Session pooling is part of Jackrabbit 2 (which is where it belongs)
anyway. IIRC, you removed it in your JR 2 branch.
I actually removed it in that branch exactly
11 matches
Mail list logo