Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Robert Munteanu, Carsten Ziegeler, Timothée Maret, Dan
Klco
+1 (non-binding): Andreas Schaefer
I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and
promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository.
Regards,
Robert
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Robert Munteanu, Carsten Ziegeler, Timothée Maret, Karl
Pauls, Dan Klco
+1 (non-binding): none
I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and
promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository.
Regards,
Robert
Hi Andy and thanks for stepping up with a new release.
I asked earlier about checking in the FAR file to the git repository. I
guess it was missed due to the non-descript subject line, sorry about
that
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r253ae564eadb877fce0af52b6f5f7a04b0b527dbd7bb82c4324b9c
Hi Andy,
On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 10:04 -0700, Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> Do you want me to remove that file from the git repository with ‘git
> filter-branch’? I used that in the past and it works but I am not
> sure if it works with GitHub or if I am allowed to do it in the
> Apache repo.
I think i
Hi,
I have been working on a Maven plugin to help with running feature
model apps during integration tests [1][2].
I have set up a branch of the launchpad-testing project where the ITs
are run based on feature model [3]. It seems to be as stable as the
master branch.
I would like to move this pl
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 07:19 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> In addition to that, it seems to me wrong to write a script which
> creates an output (being that html or json or whatever) and then you
> need an additional mechanism to modify this output. Wouldn't it be
> much
> better to create the
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 15:29 +0100, Julian Sedding wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Stefan,
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 14:47 +0100, Stefan Egli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to reactivate SLING-5884 and a related discussion [1] we
> had
> about deprecating the query part of the Sling Event API.
>
> TL;DR: Open question is exactly which of the JobManager methods do
> we
> want to de
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 17:17 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Eventually we should move to some ootb solution for job processing
> and
> not reinvent the wheel another time. (We should have never started
> with
> our own job processing API, but that went out of the window already).
> So
> depreca
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 17:42 +0100, Stefan Egli wrote:
> Right, Sling Jobs can help in defining the deprecation, which is
> exactly
> what I've use it for now. (btw: I went even further in restricting
> the
> API, as I think retryJobById and getJobById are potentially expensive
> as
> well, thus
On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 10:22 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:08 AM Robert Munteanu
> wrote:
> > ...My personal opinion is that an interface with half of its
> > methods
> > deprecated is confusing and should not be used
>
Hi Jason,
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 12:00 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> 1. Creating a resource provider to use as the default resource
> provider for the starter installation
> 2. Define a Resource
> 3. Define a Resource Type hierarchy
> 4. Convert all generated HTML to HTML5 standards
> 5. Fix the
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 21:17 +0200, Jörg Hoh wrote:
> Am Di., 23. Okt. 2018 um 16:29 Uhr schrieb Robert Munteanu <
> romb...@apache.org>:
>
> > I think it would be an interesting and worthwhile exercise to see
> > what
> > various contributors would like to see as
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 12:03 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> > On 29 Oct 2018, at 11:37, Robert Munteanu
> > wrote:
> >
> > Wild idea: would it be possible to provide an optional extension
> > point
> > for scripting engines where they could
On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 18:28 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 18:29 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> (And I should also get a prize for the longest subject line of a
> release mail...)
Fully agree, and I just gave you a +1. Get at least three of them in 72
hours and then follow the steps at [1] to claim your prize!
Robert
[1]:
http://sli
On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 13:10 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, at 5:50 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 12:00 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> > > 1. Creating a resource provider to use as the default resour
On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 13:18 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, at 5:50 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 12:00 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> > > 1. Creating a resource provider to use as the default resource
On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 13:26 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote:
>
> - Jason
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, at 5:50 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 12:00 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> > > 1. Creating a resource provider to use
On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 20:48 +0100, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> > Wild idea: would it be possible to provide an optional extension
> > point
> > for scripting engines where they could signal that a link is
> > output?
> > Then we would have a central place for handling link rewriting.
> >
> > I guess for
On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 16:48 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2018-11-02 at 10:45 +, dav...@apache.org wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 18:00 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 11:04 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I was pointed to [0] recently, when I had to create a new repository
> for the HTL runtime.
>
> > On 7 Nov 2018, at 09:32, David Bosschaert <
> > david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Are there any sling-specific instruc
Hi David,
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 12:01 +, David Bosschaert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I started migrating the code from the sling-whiteboard to individual
> repositories.
> The final step is to add the sources to the kibble demo instance
> http://demo.kibble.apache.org
>
> When I add
> https://gith
On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 19:57 -0500, Daniel Klco wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Anyone else?
Thanks,
Robert
Hi,
We discussed a couple of time that it would be desireable to move tests
closer to the code they're testing.
I wrote a proposal about how this could look like in terms of results
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Moving+integration+tests+closer+to+the+code+they+test
I purpose
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 16:29 +0200, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> I think it would be an interesting and worthwhile exercise to see
> what
> various contributors would like to see as the major themes of Sling
> 12.
Well, since I was the one asking :-)
My areas of focus for Sling 12 wou
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 17:00 +0100, Karl Pauls wrote:
> Please vote to approve these releases:
+1
Robert
Hi Valentin,
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 21:05 +0100, Valentin Olteanu wrote:
> I just wanted to drop [1] which can give you some guidelines on where
> to
> put the tests. It shows the drawbacks of having the tests in
> src/test/ and
> it states that the preferred way is to create a separate project.
>
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 14:37 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 5:29 PM Robert Munteanu
> wrote:
> > ...
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Moving+integration+tests+closer+to+the+code+they+test
> > ...
>
&g
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 17:07 +0100, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> I wrote a proposal about how this could look like in terms of
> > results
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Moving+integration+tests+c
> > loser+to+the+code+they+test
> >
> > I purposefully avoided looking into imple
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 15:56 +0100, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> Anyone else?
See :-)
Thanks,
Robert
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 11:56 +, David Bosschaert wrote:
> I propose that we move this code to a new repository called
> sling-org-apache-sling-feature-inventoryprinter
+1
Robert
Hi,
I am wondering if it makes sense to mark a feature as 'complete'. A
complete feature would be one that is expected to be launched
individually, e.g. needs to additions to function.
I would see the benefits mainly in tooling:
- a complete feature is self-contained, therefore all requirements
Hi,
For certain scenarios there would be a need to package a feature-based
application into a single jar file. I'm thinking mostly about desktop
applications, but if we move the Sling Starter to the feature model a
single jar deliverable would also be nice.
It's probably not too much work to:
-
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 13:12 +, David Bosschaert wrote:
> FWIW the current description of features vs 'complete features' in
> the OSGi
> RFP can be found in section 2.4 of [1].
>
> @Robert Munteanu pretty much what you described
> :)
Ah OK. I should've rea
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 13:49 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> - what exactly does complete imply? can it be launched with other
> features? etc. I guess we just need to define this.
My personal optinion is that we should be able to launch a complete
feature with other features. One scenario which
ert wrote:
> +1
>
> Would be great :)
>
> David
>
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 12:52, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
>
> > I think this is on the wish list, so yes :)
> >
> > It just needs "someone" to start the work (hint hint)
> >
> > Reg
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 13:50 +0100, Georg Henzler wrote:
> +1 to move the tests closer to the code.
>
> Regarding the path src/test/it (mentioned in the wiki page):
> Shouldn't
> we rather stick with src/test/java for both ITs and regular tests
> and
> just use the standard name conventions as co
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Radu Cotescu, Georg Henzler, Daniel Klco, Robert Munteanu
I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and promote the
artifacts to the central Maven repository.
Thanks,
Robert
On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 15:00 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Jason,
On Fri, 2018-11-16 at 11:26 -0500, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> As part of
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8116
>
> Which came about in the comments for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7934
>
> I discovered that the Converter works differently then our current
>
same project as the code being tested,
which is basically the reason for kicking off this discussion. If I get
my ITs executed on `mvn install` it's perfect. If I need to run
something else, well, ... not so much :-)
Thanks,
Robert
>
> WDYT?
> - Andrei
>
> On
On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 10:09 -0400, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
>
> > I think that's an important point, this should live on the Sling
> > level.
> > For the sake of being complete, there are also Oak restrictions
On Wed, 2018-11-21 at 14:30 -0500, Daniel Klco wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
Please find the draft board report below. I plan to submit it in a week
from now, feedback welcome.
## Description:
Apache Sling™ is a framework for RESTful web-applications based on an
extensible content tree.
## Issues:
There are no issues requiring board attention at this time.
## A
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 15:52 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 20:11 +0100, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 14:26 +0100, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 17:10 -0800, Eric Norman wrote:
> Would someone be able to review the changes done for those issues and
> if
> there are no objections to the code changes assist with releasing
> those two
> bundles? I've never done that before and I not sure I even have
> sufficien
Hi Jason,
Top-posting to sort of give a summary of my personal opinion: it's
absolutely fine to experiment with new resource providers and
extensions to the resource provider API.
Looking forward to a discussion when we have more concrete stuff to
talk about :-)
Thanks,
Robert
On Mon, 2018-11-
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 12:13 -0500, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2021/
Hi Jason,
I get a 404, I think forgot to close the staging repo.
Robert
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 12:32 -0500, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> Try again, it had encountered issues closing the first time
>
> - Jason
All good now, thanks!
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 12:13 -0500, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 08:01 +, Marius Petria wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Radu,
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 15:59 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As some of you might know from adaptTo() 2018, Karl and I have been
> working on a new way of resolving and deploying scripts in Sling [0].
> Now we’d like to move the code into its own repository, for better
> tracking of
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 17:13 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> > On 6 Dec 2018, at 16:01, Robert Munteanu
> > wrote:
> >
> > Which bundles from the whiteboard are you going to move? There seem
> > to
> > be multiple projects there.
>
&
Hi,
I'm playing around with the feature model and I ran into the following
scenario:
1. Launch application with features A,B
2. I become wiser and realise I included too much in feature A, so now
I move some stuff from A into feature C. So now I launch with A' (A
without stuff moved to C) + B
At
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 14:57 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:46 PM Robert Munteanu
> wrote:
> > ...is this something that can be seen in scope of the
> > feature model (launcher?) or is the recommendation to use other
> >
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 15:15 +0100, Karl Pauls wrote:
> ...
> > > Would that cause trouble in your case? I tend to think that it
> > > would
> > > help people move to a devops mindset, where Sling instances are
> > > throwaway.
> ...
> > But yes, I guess this is a valid reply, just drop everything (
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 11:35 +0100, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find the draft board report below. I plan to submit it in a
> week
> from now, feedback welcome.
(snip)
I posted the report exactly as proposed in the initial email.
Thanks,
Robert
Hi Jason,
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 11:58 -0500, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> Got a question. Sling has the TM mark against it. I ran across
> someone on NPM who is making stuff for Sling, which is cool, but he
> also has a Sling name which initially made me think it was part of
> the dev team.
>
> Is tha
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 20:56 -0800, Eric Norman wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Ok, I will give it a try. Please advise if I mess something up.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
Everything turned up fine from the first try, that's nice!
Robert
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:39 AM Robert
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 20:36 -0800, Eric Norman wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 10:31 -0500, Jason E Bailey wrote:
> I will promote this to the central Maven repository. I need someone
> from the PMC to copy this release to the Sling dist directory.
Done in r31495. Jason, could you please also update website, Jira, etc?
Thanks,
Robert
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 11:14 -0800, Eric Norman wrote:
> I don't know the status of the work on those 2 issues. Are there any
> objections to moving those 2 unresolved issues to the next version
> and
> release what is there now as 3.0.6?
No objections from me, neither of them looks critical. I di
On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 12:45 -0800, Eric Norman wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 11:27 +0100, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 11:31 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Also, as a personal curiosity - we don't typically use the bundle names
as release versions, was there a particular reason to do so?
Thanks,
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
On Sun, 2018-12-16 at 19:53 -0800, Eric Norman wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 18:49 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
I enabled the automatic publication of all changes pushed to the master
branch of the sling-site repository. Therefore there is no more need to
publish the site manually.
More details at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7180 .
Thanks,
Robert
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 15:32 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:04 PM Robert Munteanu
> wrote:
> > ...Also, as a personal curiosity - we don't typically use the
> > bundle names
> > as release versions, was there a par
Hi,
I've been experimenting how we can get Jenkins to validate PRs that are
opened against our Github modules with SLING-7245 [1]. I now have a
working POC that I would like to discuss with the dev list.
The major changes are:
- switching from a Maven module build to a Multipipeline build
- swit
On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 12:20 +0100, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> The major changes are:
>
> - switching from a Maven module build to a Multipipeline build
> - switching from job creation using the Job DSL plug-in to using a
> GitHub organisation folder
I forgot to mention the w
On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 14:45 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember that at some point we used to have a .htaccess file with
> redirects. Can something like that still be used to redirect http
> requests to https?
I'm +1 on going HTTPS only. I am not sure how to trigger it though.
I not
On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 14:25 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thank you for this, looks very nice!
>
> > the entire Jenkinsfile is defined as
> > slingOsgiBundleBuild()
>
> So IIUC we'd to add a Jenkinsfile with just this to all our modules?
>
> And then the job at https:
It's worth noting that it only affects Mac builds so far, so enforcing
Java 9 might be a step too far.
Robert
On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 17:01 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote:
> I think due to that we should enforce building with at least Java 9.
> WDYT?
>
> > On 18. Dec 2018, at 16:54, Konrad Windszus
Hi Bertrand,
On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 10:54 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:49 PM Robert Munteanu
> wrote:
> > ...I enabled the automatic publication of all changes pushed to the
> > master
> > branch of the sling-site
Hi Radu,
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 13:47 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I’m still the odd one here. Is there any chance you could help out
> with a Jenkinsfile example for [5]? The Jenkins build for this IT
> module would need to enable the “Advanced sub-modules behaviours”, in
> order t
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 14:02 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Sure!
>
> > On 20 Dec 2018, at 13:52, Robert Munteanu
> > wrote:
> >
> > Is it OK if I disable the old job and create a Jenkinsfile-based
> > one
> > for experiments?
See
https://builds.ap
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 17:12 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> There seems to be a weird thing happening with Nexus. The metadata
> file says that the latest snapshot for
> org.apache.sling.scripting.bundle.tracker is 0.0.1-20181220.104433-7
> [5]. However, the last artifact has version 0.0.1-20181220.10
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 18:17 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Should be solved with
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8189 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8189>;. I think we were
> hitting MDEPLOY-221.
Awesome, thanks!
On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 08:18 -0800, Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> In an Adobe AEM beta build Tenant 1.1.2 was used and it fails to
> deploy its services as it is missing the OSGI-INF folder. The current
> master (1.1.1-SNAPHOST ??) is just doing fine.
For the record, this was reported and fixed with
h
Hi,
We solved 1 issue in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12343999
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2033
You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
signatures:
https://gitbox.apac
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 09:56 +0100, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 10:39 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> i've created a new sling git repo [1] for the first time following
> the steps from [2].
>
> what is missing from this list or does not work yet:
>
> 1. although part of the sling-aggregator XML file no jenkins job is
> create
On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 16:47 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Radu,
On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 14:35 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> How far are we from being able to merge
> https://github.com/apache/sling-tooling-jenkins/tree/feature/SLING-7245
> <
> https://github.com/apache/sling-tooling-jenkins/tree/feature/SLING-7245
> > back to master?
>
Hi Stefan,
On Mon, 2019-01-14 at 19:53 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> unfortunately it's not possible to create a new gitbox repo named
> "sling-sling-maven-plugin" because the form validation thinks the
> double prefix was not intended.
Initially we only added the 'sling-' prefix if it was missi
On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 14:00 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 1:32 PM Carsten Ziegeler <
> cziege...@apache.org> wrote:
> > That (archiving) sounds like a good option to me...
>
> I like it as well, but...
>
> > Stefan Seifert wrote
> > > additionally in github there is
On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 14:31 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> > I know there are multiple Github-related items that we would to get
> > more tooling on:
> >
> > - archiving repositories
> > - github topics
> > - disabling Jira integration
> >
> > It would be great is someone could create a wiki page
On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 08:28 -0600, Daniel Klco wrote:
> Badging should be possible, I'm not sure right now we have an example
> of
> deprecated projects which are in GitHub. If someone wanted to point
> me to
> one, I could check why it's not badged properly.
This is an archived repository.
htt
On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 14:52 -0600, Daniel Klco wrote:
> Yeah, sorry a sling project specifically.
I don't think we have one yet...
Robert
On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 15:45 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:31 PM Stefan Seifert <
> sseif...@pro-vision.de> wrote:
> > ...as starting point i've created a wiki page:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/VIUCBg ...
>
> Thank you! I have tweaked it to make it cle
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Carsten Ziegeler, Stefan Seifert, Robert Munteanu
I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and promote the
artifacts to the central Maven repository.
Thanks all for voting.
Robert
On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 13:06 +0100, Radu Cotescu wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Roy,
On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 13:35 +0100, Roy Teeuwen wrote:
> Hey dev's,
>
> Since the use of the ObjectConverter, the ValueMapDecorator class
> which is in the api package bundle, uses an impl class. Is this good
> practice?
>
> See
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-api/blob
1701 - 1800 of 10936 matches
Mail list logo
