Apologies: I just signed up for this email list right now. I was signed up for
the old Lucene list but didn't realize that the split would impact the mailing
list as well. Explains a lot, now that I think about it.
I'll answer all the questions here, that I see from the thread:
1: (Noble) Full t
FYI Relevant conversation about Crave.io from 2.5 years ago. I chat with
"Uv" (Yuvraaj), Crave's CEO, on occasion about this arrangement.
I arranged for "crave run" to do the needful without all the extra params
needed. I just did a build a minute ago -- took 6m 27sec on branch_9_1;
one failing
This is very cool. Thanks for working on this, David. Can multiple
developers execute their tests at the same time?
On Thu, 26 Jan, 2023, 5:07 am Noble Paul, wrote:
> This is interesting.
>
> So, if the PR is merged , we will have the full test running on crave.io
> for every PR raised?
>
> On T
Yup you came to the same conclusion that I did that I didn't expect it to
pass. But it's never failed before which is super interesting in itself (at
least according to builds list)
I'm not sure if it's out of order or just missed a key or something. Sadly
the string comparison only shows the firs
:
: I checked using JDK 16 (using JAVA_HOME and RUNTIME_JAVA_HOME) and still
: passed. even checked with beast over 100 iterations on JDK 16 and JDK 17:
Wait a minute ... this test is even more screwy then i initially
thought...
1) create a HashMap "map" with some key/val pairs
2) use SolrJSO
This is interesting.
So, if the PR is merged , we will have the full test running on crave.io
for every PR raised?
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:22 AM David Smiley wrote:
> We haven't been running all our tests in GitHub Actions (i.e. PR
> validation) because it was too time consuming to do so. I
This looks awesome. Is Crave really prepared for anyone in the world to run
this build on their hardware whenever they want? or does it require
membership/paid? If there is a limit is it per person or per project?
I don't mind a command of that length so much. That's what bash history is
for (or r
We haven't been running all our tests in GitHub Actions (i.e. PR
validation) because it was too time consuming to do so. I don't recall how
slow it was when someone last tried; it's probably better now but still
slow. To make up for this, there is a GHA only for SolrJ if a PR touches
SolrJ.
Ther
I checked using JDK 16 (using JAVA_HOME and RUNTIME_JAVA_HOME) and still
passed. even checked with beast over 100 iterations on JDK 16 and JDK 17:
RUNTIME_JAVA_HOME=~/Downloads/jdk-16.0.2+7/Contents/Home ./gradlew
:solr:solrj:test --tests
"org.apache.solr.common.util.TestSolrJsonWriter.test" -Ptes
: This doesn't reproduce for me but seems really scary that a simple json
: writing test is failing.
Did you try using jdk-16 like jenkins?
At a glance the part of this test that's failing is checking an
anootation/reflection based feature of the writer -- i bet that in past
versions of the J
This doesn't reproduce for me but seems really scary that a simple json
writing test is failing.
Kevin Risden
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:07 AM Policeman Jenkins Server <
jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Solr-main-Linux/9791/
> Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-16.0.2 -X
Thanks, Michael for leading this and everyone involved!
Great bug-fixing release!
--
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*
e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io
*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Trai
Thanks a lot, Michael.
On Wed, 25 Jan, 2023, 8:16 pm Michael Gibney, wrote:
> The Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 9.1.1.
>
> Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
> from the Apache Solr project. Its major features include powerful
> full-
The Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 9.1.1.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Solr project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, dynamic
clustering, database integration,
14 matches
Mail list logo
