Re: Http2SolrClient response compression

2023-04-21 Thread Mark Miller
If you are looking for performance, you probably want to do some tests to verify you will get it. Most of the binary protocols seem to avoid compression beyond what Solrs JavaBin does, which is very simple numerical compression, with the idea the cost should be small enough to maintain a performan

Re: Apache Solr Schemeless mode with .Net Core

2023-04-21 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 4/21/23 06:43, Dipu Divakaran wrote: Can someone provide me any examples/link/document for implementing Apache Solr Indexing and Search with schemeless mode in .Net core? Schemaless mode is entirely server-side at index time. Queries and clients will not be affected by schemaless mode.

Re: [Discuss] Solr 9.2.1 BugFix Release

2023-04-21 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
In this particular matter, there's absolutely no need. Anyway, I think it is water under the bridge now, unless someone from PMC comes back a few days later and, bizzarely, votes against letting committers push to the SVN server (something we've always allowed in the past, before 9.0). On Sat, 22

Re: [Discuss] Solr 9.2.1 BugFix Release

2023-04-21 Thread Mike Drob
Eid Mubarak to all who celebrate and happy Friday to everybody else. And happy weekend to those who want to rest and not check emails constantly. And hey, wouldn't you know it, the next workday isn't until 72 hours away! Let's try to be accommodating to all of our friends, yes? On Thu, Apr 20, 202

Re: [Operator] [VOTE] Release the Solr Operator v0.7.0 RC1

2023-04-21 Thread Jan Høydahl
It is enough with (C) 2006, then we never need to change it again. Jan Høydahl > 21. apr. 2023 kl. 18:57 skrev Houston Putman : > > Thanks for checking that Jan. > > I don't think it's a blocker, but I'll fix it for the next set of releases. > > - Houston > >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 5:34 AM

Re: [Discuss] Solr 9.2.1 BugFix Release

2023-04-21 Thread Justin Sweeney
Thanks! I am continuing on with the release process in the meantime, if any other JIRAs are blockers for the bugfix release, let me know. On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:15 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I added my vote to the JIRA > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24485 - you can do the same >

Re: [Operator] [VOTE] Release the Solr Operator v0.7.0 RC1

2023-04-21 Thread Houston Putman
Thanks for checking that Jan. I don't think it's a blocker, but I'll fix it for the next set of releases. - Houston On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 5:34 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > +1 > > > Successfully smoke tested the Solr Operator v0.7.0! > > Only ran smoke tester. Would have upgraded a test cluster bu

Re: [Discuss] Solr 9.2.1 BugFix Release

2023-04-21 Thread Jan Høydahl
I added my vote to the JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24485 - you can do the same and then it will be up to INFRA to request a formal VOTE. Jan > 21. apr. 2023 kl. 17:01 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya > : > > I don't think we need a vote. We should just negotiate with INFRA to do

Re: [Discuss] Solr 9.2.1 BugFix Release

2023-04-21 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
I don't think we need a vote. We should just negotiate with INFRA to do the sensible thing. On Fri, 21 Apr, 2023, 7:56 pm Justin Sweeney, wrote: > Just to close the loop on this, should I kick off a vote as a new thread to > the dev group or should that be kicked off by a PMC member? I don't see

Re: [Discuss] Solr 9.2.1 BugFix Release

2023-04-21 Thread Justin Sweeney
Just to close the loop on this, should I kick off a vote as a new thread to the dev group or should that be kicked off by a PMC member? I don't see the 3 day period as a blocker here for the release. On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 7:15 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > 24 hou

Apache Solr Schemeless mode with .Net Core

2023-04-21 Thread Dipu Divakaran
Team, Can someone provide me any examples/link/document for implementing Apache Solr Indexing and Search with schemeless mode in .Net core? Thanks DD This e-mail is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any

Re: [Operator] [VOTE] Release the Solr Operator v0.7.0 RC1

2023-04-21 Thread Jan Høydahl
+1 > Successfully smoke tested the Solr Operator v0.7.0! Only ran smoke tester. Would have upgraded a test cluster but won't be able to before next week. Minor: NOTICE file in both helm chart tgzs still says "Copyright 2006-2021 The Apache Software Foundation" Jan > 19. apr. 2023 kl. 22:02 s

Re: Cloud storage modules for backup/restore

2023-04-21 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
My colleague at SearchScale has tried S3FS, and running Solr indexes off S3. We can chat about it, if you're interested. On Fri, 21 Apr, 2023, 10:38 am David Smiley, wrote: > Cool! > I wonder if anyone has tried such things for a Lucene/Solr "Directory" as > well? > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Luc