-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
I think it would be better if we did not allow end-of-line comments and
required all comments to match:
/^\s*#/
Then comments don't need to be escaped. I think that would involve less
surprise and also solves the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 16:06 ---
Subject: Re: Unescaped '#' in rawbody causes havoc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
I think it would be better if we did
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 16:12 ---
Subject: Re: Unescaped '#' in rawbody causes havoc
Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would be a major change in how our configuration files are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3830
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.0.1
--- Additional
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would be a major change in how our configuration files are parsed,
breaking a documented (although not particularly clearly) convention
that's been there since the project
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 16:29 ---
Subject: Re: Unescaped '#' in rawbody causes havoc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Malte S. Stretz writes:
On Sunday 26 September 2004 10:42 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote:
[...]
Do we really need to do this now? This is not going to significantly
help performance, accuracy, or memory usage, is it?
As much as I loved to have
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 18:26 ---
Subject: Re: Unescaped '#' in rawbody causes havoc
Observation and a comment.
Observation: I occasionally use a comment at the end of a rule on the line
with
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 18:35 ---
Subject: Re: Unescaped '#' in rawbody causes havoc
I think it would be better if we did not allow end-of-line comments and
required all comments to match:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton writes:
BTW, this is the rule reliability tflag idea again; basically provide a
way to
hint that this rule is reliable, and this rule should not be considered
reliable
-- no matter what their hit-rates in mass-checks were.
I
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 18:44 ---
it looks like something is up with the configuration reset in spamd perhaps...
this is 3.0.0 final, not a 3.0.0 devel, pre, or rc, right?
the Storable module is
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 18:50 ---
Subject: Re: Unescaped '#' in rawbody causes havoc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think I' be a lot happier with a more complex rule for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 19:11 ---
Subject: Re: Unescaped '#' in rawbody causes havoc
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 06:35:20PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I' be a lot happier with a more
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 19:15 ---
Subject: Re: Unescaped '#' in rawbody causes havoc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The easiest thing I came up with is to take what is
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3575
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 19:16 ---
has there been anything else with this? does 3.0.0 final have the same issue?
I can't reproduce the issue either, so I'm tempted to close wfm.
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3822
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 19:20 ---
I don't know how easy or difficult it is to do in Makefile.PL, but it would be
pretty trivial for a general
test.
--- You are receiving this mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
- (public) message rewriting functionality
rewrite_mail
move code into another class; leave this public API on the ::Scan
object which calls into that
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3834
Summary: incorrect URL
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
URL: http://spamassassin.apache.org/doc.html
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
OK, here's a trick I was thinking about. Currently we have these massive
hashtable refs:
$pms-{conf}-{rbl_evals}
{head_tests}
{body_tests}
{scoreset}-[0,1,2,3]
{tflags}
Each of those is keyed by
Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes, actually, you're right.
Hmmm... I'm not sure how to take that. ;-)
I'd propose that rewriting be part of a Mail::SpamAssassin::Format
class.
any particular reason for that name?
It was the best name I could come up with. :-)
- Scan:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
Array lookups are quite a bit faster than hash lookups.
+1
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ http://www.apachecon.com/ sessions more)
so I'm thinking that we should replace parts of this with arrays, using
integer indexes, instead of hashes with string indexes.
Array lookups are quite a bit faster than hash lookups.
I have no idea how painful linked lists are in Perl (or if they even exist).
But if you are essentially
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 23:04 ---
btw, applied to HEAD as r47391
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
I have no idea how painful linked lists are in Perl (or if they even
exist).
Why are you commenting then???
Because they are very useful, as I pointed out.
They don't exist as a native data structure. Arrays are fast, painless,
and dynamically sized.
They don't exist as a native data
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 23:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=2377)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2377action=view)
fix for fd issue
adds some serious sanity-checking and
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3801
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 23:10 ---
+1. those sick, sick MUAs
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Received header parser gets |[review] Received header
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3734
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3831
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 23:14 ---
doh. +1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|pyzor check timed out after |[review]
|10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton writes:
I have no idea how painful linked lists are in Perl (or if they even
exist).
Why are you commenting then???
Because they are very useful, as I pointed out.
They don't exist as a native data structure. Arrays are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 23:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=2378)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2378action=view)
grep of 'uri found' from sa3 before patch
output from
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 23:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=2379)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2379action=view)
grep of 'uri found' from sa3 after patch
grep of uri
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 23:12 ---
ho hum. anyone interested in trying this? will I have to do a mass-check
--net? ;)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3835
Summary: What preferences can be set in the DB ?
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Sun
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3829
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 06:29 ---
hmm.. looks like this may be the problem. netstat reports 16 tcp sessions
established to 783/tcp, which would indicate all the children are busy right?
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 06:41 ---
hmm.. looks like this may be the problem. netstat reports 16 tcp sessions
established to 783/tcp, which would indicate all the children are busy right?
That is an unreasonablly nasty retort.
Original Message:
-
From: Daniel Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 27 Sep 2004 22:53:38 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: speedup for PerMsgStatus
Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have no idea how
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 07:48 ---
I got it from CPAN so I assume it is 3.0.0 final. Here are the lint lines...
(The storeable module does seem to be loaded.)
debug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.0
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 09:05 ---
Subject: Re: spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:14:27AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the DNS for a bit to try and figure out
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 09:21 ---
err.. now i'm going to have to wait until it happens again. seems to be
popping up about every 2 hours or so. i've come up with a lot more info in
the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3837
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 09:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=2380)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2380action=view)
fix
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3837
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Received parser: over-broad |[review] Received parser:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3765
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 10:21 ---
I expect that this is too much of a change for 3.0.1. Any chance of doing this
for 3.1.0?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3838
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 10:48 ---
Subject: Re: New: Insecure dependency in eval while running setuid
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:30:53AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running Linux Redhat 9
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 10:54 ---
here is what i have found. take a look at the ps listing below and you'll see
the START time on the first 7 children is 03:XX and the last 8 children is
12:XX..
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 10:57 ---
-1 this patch disables a lot of code which was specifically put in to deal
with what browsers support.
I don't mind skipping the non-schemed URLs, and agree
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 11:26 ---
Subject: Re: spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:54:41AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is no active spamc client on the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 11:32 ---
BTW: This seems related to bug 3782.
You are not authorized to access bug #3782.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3765
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2031 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 12:18 ---
Subject: Re: [review] get_uri_list generates excess uris from this message
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:05:07PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 12:26 ---
I patch comment #34 against SA 3.0 and got the following results from a single
message:
Sep 28 12:15:59 mgw1.healthknowledge.com /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[7289]:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839
Summary: perl's refcounting may be causing us trouble with copy-
on-write
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3840
Summary: Upgrade document should list changes in bayes learn
syntax in conf file
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 13:45 ---
Subject: Re: [review] get_uri_list generates excess uris from this message
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:05:50PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 13:52 ---
Can you check to see if something is running on port 9?
Possibly something is actually accepting a connection, so we don't get the
Connection refused message.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:17 ---
I've just installed 3.0.0 on a debian 3.0 system. This test failed for me too.
Port 9 is indeed accepting connections. From nmap:
Port State
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:24 ---
It looks like port 9 would accept connections. In /etc/inetd.conf I find:
discard stream tcp6nowait rootinternal
discard dgram udp6waitroot
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:29 ---
what does that look like in the source msg? I don't think http://#anchor; is a
valid format for a HTTP URI at all. #anchor, filename.html#anchor,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:31 ---
Subject: Re: [review] get_uri_list generates excess uris from this message
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 02:29:35PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what does that
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:33 ---
Subject: Re: [review] get_uri_list generates excess uris from this message
yeah, they definitely work. www.spamassassin.org and spamassassin.org
don't, but
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3816
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:37 ---
+1 on Sidney's suggestion
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:42 ---
Subject: Re: [review] get_uri_list generates excess uris from this message
what does that look like in the source msg? I don't think
http://#anchor; is a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:43 ---
Subject: Re: [review] get_uri_list generates excess uris from this message
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 02:38:56PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'we don't
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:49 ---
they definitely work. www.spamassassin.org and spamassassin.org
don't, but schemeless is a different animal from malformed
I'm used to www.spamassassin.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:57 ---
Subject: Re: [review] get_uri_list generates excess uris from this message
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 02:33:39PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incorrect.
OE
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 15:10 ---
Subject: Re: [review] get_uri_list generates excess uris from this message
OE quite happily turns the first of those into a link to http://www.etc.
Possibly
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 15:33 ---
bill, could you edit Util.pm and comment these lines:
if (fileno(STDOUT) != 1) {
die setuid: oops: fileno(STDOUT) [.fileno(STDOUT).] != 1;
}
if that
69 matches
Mail list logo
