Quoting Matthias Leisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I couldn't say for sure what a safe level of queries would be. If I were
> > to guess, I'd say somewhere under 20,000 per 24 hour period.
>
> Speaking for dnswl.org, we consider sites[*] with > 100k queries per 24
> hour as "heavy users" who should r
> I couldn't say for sure what a safe level of queries would be. If I were
> to guess, I'd say somewhere under 20,000 per 24 hour period.
Speaking for dnswl.org, we consider sites[*] with > 100k queries per 24
hour as "heavy users" who should rsync our data and run a local mirror.
20k will only s
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:26:03AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > That's great if we use the zone machine for DNS, that doesn't really work
> > for
> > individuals running on our own machines... ;)
>
> Do you run a simple caching named on your machine?
No, I run a full multi domain named on my
Matt Kettler wrote:
Which also brings up a second issue. Should we disable Spamhaus by
default as we've done in the past for razor and DCC? They're no longer
"free for everyone", and actually even reasonably small networks can't
use them for free (100 user limit).
This has been on my mind for
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> That's great if we use the zone machine for DNS, that doesn't really work for
> individuals running on our own machines... ;)
>
Do you run a simple caching named on your machine?
If so, it would be really easy to add a forwarding zone to forward all
queries for a p
Michael Parker wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Michael Parker wrote:
Maybe we should add a --force-reuse that would ignore any msgs that
can't be reused.
I'm thinking that should be the only option for reuse.
This is how it originally worked, but a large portion of the spam traps
had neve
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Michael Parker wrote:
>
>> Maybe we should add a --force-reuse that would ignore any msgs that
>> can't be reused.
>
> I'm thinking that should be the only option for reuse.
>
This is how it originally worked, but a large portion of the spam traps
had never been run
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 10:16:21PM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
If we do more frequent --net mass-checks we may individually run the
chance of being blocked by the providers of the (URI)DNSBLs such as
Spamhaus.
Has anyone been blocked to date? Probably not given th
Michael Parker wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Are the hit-rates of the lists high enough that the results that aren't
cached by the use of --reuse low enough to fall under the block
triggering level? Either way, I guess we should get around to figuring
out a way of caching the non-hits. I'
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 10:16:21PM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> If we do more frequent --net mass-checks we may individually run the
> chance of being blocked by the providers of the (URI)DNSBLs such as
> Spamhaus.
>
> Has anyone been blocked to date? Probably not given the once a week
>
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 at 22:16 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Has anyone been blocked to date? Probably not given the once a week
frequency.
Not speaking of mass-checks, I'm guessing it's a pretty high ratio. Our
servers are blocked. The average 5xx rejections in a given 24 hour period
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Random thoughts on frequent re-scoring mass-checks...
>
> If we do more frequent --net mass-checks we may individually run the
> chance of being blocked by the providers of the (URI)DNSBLs such as
> Spamhaus.
>
> Has anyone been blocked to date? Probably not given the
Random thoughts on frequent re-scoring mass-checks...
If we do more frequent --net mass-checks we may individually run the
chance of being blocked by the providers of the (URI)DNSBLs such as
Spamhaus.
Has anyone been blocked to date? Probably not given the once a week
frequency.
Are the h
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5557
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
*** ASF Nagios ***
Notification Type: RECOVERY
Host: spamassassin.zones.apache.org
Address: 140.211.11.80
State: UP
Info: $
Date/Time: Wed Sept 5 22:19:59 BST 2007
*** ASF Nagios ***
Notification Type: PROBLEM
Host: spamassassin.zones.apache.org
Address: 140.211.11.80
State: DOWN
Info: $
Date/Time: Wed Sept 5 22:19:48 BST 2007
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5599
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-05 04:11 ---
noted via mail:
'From: Per Jessen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5599
/etc/resolv.conf provides for round-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5599
>
>
/etc/resolv.conf provides for round-robining of name-servers
>From the man-page:
options:
rotate : sets RES_ROTATE in _res.options, which causes round robin
selection of nameservers from among those l
18 matches
Mail list logo
