Theo Van Dinter wrote, On 17/12/07 9:38 AM:
> Wow. This has sat around for ages! :(
>
> It doesn't look like anything got committed to fix these issues, but we should
> get that done and get 3.1.10 out. Sidney, do you still have the code you were
> working on for this? I didn't see any open bug
Wow. This has sat around for ages! :(
It doesn't look like anything got committed to fix these issues, but we should
get that done and get 3.1.10 out. Sidney, do you still have the code you were
working on for this? I didn't see any open bugs w/ milestone of 3.1.10, and
3.1.11 only has a single
Matt Kettler wrote, On 27/7/07 1:53 PM:
> I just applied this to the 3.1.10 pre-release and ran my make test as root.
>
> The previous issue is gone, however now I get:
What OS and perl version are you running?
Let's continue discussion of your make test as root failure in bug 5574
http://issues
Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote, On 17/7/07 1:07 PM:
>
>> I'm having trouble getting 3.1.10 to pass "make test" as root. Passes
>> just fine as a non-root user.
>>
>
> Matt, can you please verify that you can apply the patch against the 3.1
> branch that I attached to bug 5510,
Matt Kettler wrote, On 17/7/07 1:07 PM:
> I'm having trouble getting 3.1.10 to pass "make test" as root. Passes
> just fine as a non-root user.
Matt, can you please verify that you can apply the patch against the 3.1
branch that I attached to bug 5510, then the patches for bugs 5518 and
5529, and
Justin Mason wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
Please do so Sidney. CPAN installs need to work as root. If the fixes
aren't backported the tests should at least be disabled.
I agree they need to be backported too. One thing though: shouldn't
users of "sudo cpan Mail::SpamAssassin" only g
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Hi --
> 3.1.10 tarballs are available for testing:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~felicity/3110/
>
> By the way: per ASF policies, only PMC member votes are binding for
> a release, but we encourage everyone to download, test, and report
> any issues!
>
I'm having troubl
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
> Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> > Matt Kettler wrote, On 17/7/07 2:40 PM:
> >> I guess since 3.1.9 is already broken, and this is actually less broken,
> >> and it's a security fix, I'm +1 on this release.
> >>
> >> However, I make that +1 with the strong recomendation that
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote, On 17/7/07 4:24 PM:
> Please do so Sidney. CPAN installs need to work as root. If the fixes
> aren't backported the tests should at least be disabled.
I'm testing it now. Bug 5518 also has to go in there.
The patch for bug 5510 doesn't apply cleanly to the 3.1 branch.
Sidney Markowitz wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote, On 17/7/07 2:40 PM:
I guess since 3.1.9 is already broken, and this is actually less broken,
and it's a security fix, I'm +1 on this release.
However, I make that +1 with the strong recomendation that we need to
get a 3.1.11 out sometime soon that ac
Matt Kettler wrote, On 17/7/07 2:40 PM:
> I guess since 3.1.9 is already broken, and this is actually less broken,
> and it's a security fix, I'm +1 on this release.
>
> However, I make that +1 with the strong recomendation that we need to
> get a 3.1.11 out sometime soon that actually builds pro
Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote, On 17/7/07 1:19 PM:
>
>> I'm having trouble getting 3.1.10 to pass "make test" as root. Passes
>> just fine as a non-root user.
>>
>> Looks like the spamd "tell" based tests are the ones failing..
>>
>
> (coming out of lurk mode now that power i
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:41:38PM +1200, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> > Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.10 is now available! This is a maintenance and
> > security release of the 3.1.x branch.
>
> Is the reference to "security release" a copy and paste error?
Hrm. Yes indeedy. It'll be just "maintenance
Theo Van Dinter wrote, On 16/7/07 3:43 PM:
> Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.10 is now available! This is a maintenance and
> security release of the 3.1.x branch.
[...]
> 3.1.10 is a minor bug-fix release. The major highlights are:
Is the reference to "security release" a copy and paste error?
Matt Kettler wrote, On 17/7/07 1:19 PM:
> (sorry for the repost.. MUA screwed up and sent from the wrong address)
>
>
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> Hi --
>> 3.1.10 tarballs are available for testing:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~felicity/3110/
>>
>> By the way: per ASF policies, only PMC member
(sorry for the repost.. MUA screwed up and sent from the wrong address)
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Hi --
> 3.1.10 tarballs are available for testing:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~felicity/3110/
>
> By the way: per ASF policies, only PMC member votes are binding for
> a release, but we encourage ev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Builds and tests ok for me.
+1
Justin Mason wrote:
> by the way, minotaur is having hardware problems, apparently so this
> tarball may be hard to get at intermittently :(
>
> +1 from me
>
> --j.
>
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
>> Hi --
>> 3.1.10 tarb
by the way, minotaur is having hardware problems, apparently so this
tarball may be hard to get at intermittently :(
+1 from me
--j.
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> Hi --
> 3.1.10 tarballs are available for testing:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~felicity/3110/
>
> By the way: per ASF policies, only
Hi --
3.1.10 tarballs are available for testing:
http://people.apache.org/~felicity/3110/
By the way: per ASF policies, only PMC member votes are binding for
a release, but we encourage everyone to download, test, and report
any issues!
my vote: +1.
BTW: my proposed release announcement is as fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
