Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-14 Thread Henry Saputra
Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release. Let's wait for his reply On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Patrick Wendell wrote: > Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something > different than this. > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > > Hi Pa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-14 Thread Patrick Wendell
Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something different than this. On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only, there > even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging artif

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-14 Thread Henry Saputra
Hi Patrick, Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only, there even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging artifact could confuse people because in our case we do package 3rd party libraries in the binary jars. I have sent email to sebb asking clarification about

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-14 Thread Patrick Wendell
Hey Henry, One thing a lot of people do during the vote is test the binaries and make sure they work. This is really valuable. If you'd like I could add a caveat to the vote thread explaining that we are only voting on the source. - Patrick On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-14 Thread Henry Saputra
Actually we should be fine putting the binaries there as long as the VOTE is for the source. Let's verify with sebb in the general@ list about his concern. - Henry On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the binaries from the > votin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-14 Thread Henry Saputra
Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the binaries from the voting directory in your people.apache.org directory. ASF release voting is for source code and not binaries, and technically we provide binaries for convenience. And add link to the KEYS location in the dist[1] to let verify signa

Re : Scala 2.10 Merge

2013-12-14 Thread andy.petre...@gmail.com
That's a very good news! Congrats Envoyé depuis mon HTC - Reply message - De : "Sam Bessalah" Pour : "dev@spark.incubator.apache.org" Objet : Scala 2.10 Merge Date : sam., déc. 14, 2013 11:03 Yes. Awesome. Great job guys. Sam Bessalah > On Dec 14, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Patrick Wendell

Re: Scala 2.10 Merge

2013-12-14 Thread Sam Bessalah
Yes. Awesome. Great job guys. Sam Bessalah > On Dec 14, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote: > > Alright I just merged this in - so Spark is officially "Scala 2.10" > from here forward. > > For reference I cut a new branch called scala-2.9 with the commit > immediately prior to the merge:

Re: Scala 2.10 Merge

2013-12-14 Thread Nick Pentreath
Whoohoo! Great job everyone especially Prashant! — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote: > Alright I just merged this in - so Spark is officially "Scala 2.10" > from here forward. > For reference I cut a new branch called scala-2.9 with the commi

Re: Scala 2.10 Merge

2013-12-14 Thread Patrick Wendell
Alright I just merged this in - so Spark is officially "Scala 2.10" from here forward. For reference I cut a new branch called scala-2.9 with the commit immediately prior to the merge: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-spark/repo?p=incubator-spark.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/scala-