Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release. Let's wait for his reply
On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Patrick Wendell wrote: > Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something > different than this. > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > > > Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only, there > > even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging artifact > > could confuse people because in our case we do package 3rd party > > libraries in the binary jars. > > > > I have sent email to sebb asking clarification about his concern in > > general@ list. > > > > - Henry > > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Patrick Wendell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hey Henry, > >> > >> One thing a lot of people do during the vote is test the binaries and > >> make sure they work. This is really valuable. If you'd like I could > >> add a caveat to the vote thread explaining that we are only voting on > >> the source. > >> > >> - Patrick > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Henry Saputra < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> Actually we should be fine putting the binaries there as long as the > >>> VOTE is for the source. > >>> > >>> Let's verify with sebb in the general@ list about his concern. > >>> > >>> - Henry > >>> > >>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Henry Saputra < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the binaries from the > >>>> voting directory in your people.apache.org directory. > >>>> ASF release voting is for source code and not binaries, and > >>>> technically we provide binaries for convenience. > >>>> > >>>> And add link to the KEYS location in the dist[1] to let verify > signatures. > >>>> > >>>> Sorry for the late response to the VOTE thread, guys. > >>>> > >>>> - Henry > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/spark/KEYS > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Patrick Wendell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 5 PPMC +1's and no 0 > or -1 > >>>>> votes. > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 (5 Total) > >>>>> Matei Zaharia* > >>>>> Nick Pentreath* > >>>>> Patrick Wendell* > >>>>> Prashant Sharma* > >>>>> Tom Graves* > >>>>> > >>>>> 0 (0 Total) > >>>>> > >>>>> -1 (0 Total) > >>>>> > >>>>> * = Binding Vote > >>>>> > >>>>> As per the incubator release guide [1] I'll be sending this to the > >>>>> general incubator list for a final vote from IPMC members. > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] > >>>>> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release- > >>>>> vote > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Evan Chan <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'd be personally fine with a standard workflow of assemble-deps + > >>>>>> packaging just the Spark files as separate packages, if it speeds up > >>>>>> everyone's development time. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mark Hamstra < > [email protected] > >>>>>> >wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I don't know how to make sense of the numbers, but here's what > I've got > >>>>>> > from a very small sample size.
