Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
faridz wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=693424&view=rev
Log:
2008-09-09 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp: Resolved compilation
error on MSVC and ICC/Windows.
Modified:
std
Martin Sebor wrote:
>
>faridz wrote:
>>
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=693424&view=rev
>> Log:
>> 2008-09-09 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp: Resolved compilation
>> error on MSVC and ICC/Windows.
>>
>> Modified:
>>
Farid Zaripov wrote:
Is there some reason that you didn't just fix the regression shown in
STDCXX-1009?
Firstly, I found the regression some time later that I commited changes in
xfail.txt.
Perhaps we need to define the process for when a failure should
go in xfail.txt? I'd be inclined to
> Is there some reason that you didn't just fix the regression shown in
> STDCXX-1009?
Firstly, I found the regression some time later that I commited changes in
xfail.txt.
Secondly, I want fix the regression and at the same time leave STDCXX-968
fixed :)
Can you, please, verify that repla
faridz wrote:
Author: faridz
Date: Tue Sep 9 03:35:59 2008
New Revision: 693424
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=693424&view=rev
Log:
2008-09-09 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tests/regress/18.c.limits.stdcxx-988.cpp: Resolved compilation
error on MSVC and ICC/Wind
> Is there some reason that you didn't just fix the regression shown in
> STDCXX-1009?
Firstly, I found the regression some time later that I commited changes in
xfail.txt.
Secondly, I want fix the regression and at the same time leave STDCXX-968
fixed :)
Can you, please, verify that rep
