Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Okay, so are we all comfortable with this? Or does anyone
want to argue to have this change reverted from 4.2.1?
Yes, it seems fine.
If there are no objections I will go ahead and create
a release candidate tarball and get the vote rolling
sometime
Martin Sebor wrote:
>
>Okay, so are we all comfortable with this? Or does anyone
>want to argue to have this change reverted from 4.2.1?
>
Yes, it seems fine.
>
>If there are no objections I will go ahead and create
>a release candidate tarball and get the vote rolling
>sometime later today.
-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:02 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r650902 - /stdcxx/trunk/src/num_put.cpp
So let me try to summarize the new behavior:
Solaris Windows Other
floatX
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:02 PM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r650902 - /stdcxx/trunk/src/num_put.cpp
>
> So let me try to summarize the new behavior:
>
&g
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:53 AM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r650902 - /stdcxx/trunk/src/num_put.cpp
I guess I don't understand why the
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:53 AM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r650902 - /stdcxx/trunk/src/num_put.cpp
>
> I guess I don't understand w
Farid Zaripov wrote:
From: Travis Vitek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Suject: RE: svn commit: r650902 - /stdcxx/trunk/src/num_put.cpp
With just a quick review, this change looks a bit suspicious. The
respective overloads for type double are all defined within
Travis Vitek wrote:
Thanks for the careful review!
Eric Lemings wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: faridz
Date: Wed Apr 23 08:20:07 2008
New Revision: 650902
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=650902&view=rev
Log:
2008-04-2
> From: Travis Vitek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Suject: RE: svn commit: r650902 - /stdcxx/trunk/src/num_put.cpp
>>With just a quick review, this change looks a bit suspicious. The
>>respective overloads for type double are all defined within
>Travis Vitek wrote:
>
>The overloads on double are in platform specific #ifdef blocks because
>they have platform specific code in them (_finite, finite,
>isfinite). At
>least that is the only reason I see for it. So I don't really see the
>overloads on float and double outside of platform spe
> Eric Lemings wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Author: faridz
>> Date: Wed Apr 23 08:20:07 2008
>> New Revision: 650902
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=650902&view=rev
>> Log:
>> 2008-04-23 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: svn commit: r650902 - /stdcxx/trunk/src/num_put.cpp
>
> Author: faridz
> Date: Wed Apr 23 08:20:07 2008
> Ne
12 matches
Mail list logo
